Compare StocksINTC vs LVS

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18
VS
LVS
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
$54.05

Rewards

INTC
    LVS
    • Gross margin of 80.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
    • Share count has been reduced by 12% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    LVS
    • FCF yield of 5.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    • High leverage (8.29x debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • 16 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    LVS
    Valuation
    $-4.50B
    Free Cash Flow
    $1.97B
    -1.95%
    FCF Yield
    5.40%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    23.00
    46.59
    Forward P/E
    14.38
    Quality & Moat
    1.24%
    ROIC
    13.66%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    84.13%
    36.56%
    Gross Margin
    79.98%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    0.78
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.37
    Debt / Equity
    8.29
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.77
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.69
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    1.94%
    INTC: 2Ties: 1LVS: 6
    INTCLVS

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    LVS

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    LVS
    $2.81
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $2.57B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$7.20B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    LVS
    30.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 30.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $54.05
    Fair Value: $77.26
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    LVS

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $54?

    +13.2%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +10.6%

    The market implies +13.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +10.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    LVS
    38/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though roic consistency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    LVS
    -2.17
    Possible Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,154
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    LVS
    Insiders 57.7%Institutions 41.7%Retail & Other 0.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,110
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    LVS
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    PANT MUKTESH
    Director
    $1.00M
    @ $43.51 · 2025-03-14
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    LVS
    0
    Sells (3M)
    16
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $329.69M
    GOLDSTEIN ROBERT G
    Chief Executive Officer
    $83.39M
    @ $66.71 · 2025-12-17
    GOLDSTEIN ROBERT G
    Chief Executive Officer
    $50.09M
    @ $66.79 · 2025-12-15
    GOLDSTEIN ROBERT G
    Chief Executive Officer
    $26.57M
    @ $66.42 · 2025-12-11
    DUMONT PATRICK
    President
    $9.22M
    @ $67.96 · 2025-12-03
    DUMONT PATRICK
    President
    $15.91M
    @ $69.88 · 2025-12-02
    HUDSON D. ZACHARY
    Officer
    $3.75M
    @ $70.37 · 2025-12-01
    CHAFETZ IRWIN
    Director
    $2.09M
    @ $69.76 · 2025-12-01
    GOLDSTEIN ROBERT G
    Chief Executive Officer
    $7.02M
    @ $70.17 · 2025-12-01
    HYZAK RANDY A.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.82M
    @ $66.45 · 2025-11-25
    HUDSON D. ZACHARY
    Officer
    $6.50M
    @ $64.99 · 2025-11-07
    GOLDSTEIN ROBERT G
    Chief Executive Officer
    $25.22M
    @ $63.04 · 2025-11-06
    GOLDSTEIN ROBERT G
    Chief Executive Officer
    $23.68M
    @ $59.20 · 2025-10-31
    GOLDSTEIN ROBERT G
    Chief Executive Officer
    $53.02M
    @ $58.92 · 2025-10-30
    GOLDSTEIN ROBERT G
    Chief Executive Officer
    $17.80M
    @ $59.32 · 2025-10-27
    FORMAN CHARLES D
    Director
    $1.08M
    @ $54.13 · 2025-09-10
    FORMAN CHARLES D
    Director
    $526,300
    @ $52.63 · 2025-08-06
    HUDSON D. ZACHARY
    Officer
    $1.33M
    @ $51.40 · 2024-11-27
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    LVS
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(47/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    LVS
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView LVS Full Analysis