Compare StocksINTC vs LUV

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Southwest Airlines Co. (LUV)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18
VS
LUV
Southwest Airlines Co.
$40.87

Rewards

INTC
    LUV
    • Share count has been reduced by 13% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $11.48 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
    • 5 insider purchases over the past 12 months with a buy/sell ratio above 3:1 — a sustained pattern of insider confidence.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    LUV
    • Gross margin of 22.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Trailing P/E of 51.7x is 26% above the historical average of 41.2x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    • Beneish M-Score of -1.64 flags financial patterns consistent with potential earnings manipulation — warrants further investigation.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    LUV
    Valuation
    $-4.50B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-683.88M
    -1.95%
    FCF Yield
    -3.24%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    51.73
    46.59
    Forward P/E
    8.42
    Quality & Moat
    1.24%
    ROIC
    8.09%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    5.53%
    36.56%
    Gross Margin
    22.04%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    1.02
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.37
    Debt / Equity
    0.75
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.77
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.60
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    1.76%
    INTC: 4Ties: 1LUV: 4
    INTCLUV

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    LUV

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    LUV
    $11.48
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $114.0M
    Δ Market Cap
    +$1.31B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    LUV
    32.3% Overvalued
    Price is 32.3% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $40.87
    Fair Value: $30.89
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    LUV

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    LUV
    37/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    LUV
    -1.64
    Likely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    LUV
    Insiders 1.2%Institutions 97.7%Retail & Other 1.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,090
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    LUV
    0
    Buys (3M)
    5
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $713,401
    SARETSKY GREGG A
    Director
    $100,447
    @ $30.03 · 2025-08-06
    FEINBERG SARAH
    Director
    $45,008
    @ $30.01 · 2025-08-05
    SARETSKY GREGG A
    Director
    $100,169
    @ $27.29 · 2025-04-30
    BREBER PIERRE R.
    Director
    $268,877
    @ $26.89 · 2025-04-29
    HESS DAVID P
    Director
    $198,900
    @ $26.52 · 2025-04-28
    FEINBERG SARAH
    Director
    $15,740
    @ $31.48 · 2025-03-14
    WATSON PATRICIA A
    Director
    $99,935
    @ $30.58 · 2025-03-13
    REYNOLDS CHRISTOPHER P.
    Director
    $99,955
    @ $30.68 · 2025-03-13
    CUSH C DAVID
    Director
    $150,150
    @ $30.03 · 2025-03-12
    ATHERTON LISA M
    Director
    $3,691
    @ $31.28 · 2025-01-30
    GANGWAL RAKESH
    Director
    $7.11M
    @ $29.39 · 2024-10-01
    GANGWAL RAKESH
    Director
    $4.83M
    @ $29.15 · 2024-10-01
    GANGWAL RAKESH
    Director
    $3.75M
    @ $29.49 · 2024-10-01
    GANGWAL RAKESH
    Director
    $15.87M
    @ $29.89 · 2024-10-01
    GANGWAL RAKESH
    Director
    $19.30M
    @ $29.98 · 2024-10-01
    KELLY GARY C
    Officer and Director
    $1.00M
    @ $29.52 · 2024-09-30
    GANGWAL RAKESH
    Director
    $34.92M
    @ $29.47 · 2024-09-30
    GANGWAL RAKESH
    Director
    $20.93M
    @ $29.65 · 2024-09-30
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    LUV
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $302,056
    JONES JUSTIN
    Officer
    $302,056
    @ $37.36 · 2025-12-05
    RUTHERFORD LINDA B
    Officer
    $132,386
    @ $34.39 · 2024-12-06
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    LUV
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(36/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    LUV
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (36)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView LUV Full Analysis