SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › INTC vs LULU

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs lululemon athletica inc. (LULU)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18
VS
LULU
lululemon athletica inc.
$165.57

Rewards

INTC
    LULU
    • ★lululemon athletica inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • ★lululemon athletica inc. scores 92/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 16.8% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

    Risks

    INTC
    • ⚠Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    LULU

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      INTC
      LULU
      Valuation
      $-4.50B
      Free Cash Flow
      $1.58B
      -1.95%
      FCF Yield
      8.06%
      N/A
      Trailing P/E
      11.51
      46.59
      Forward P/E
      12.36
      Quality & Moat
      1.24%
      ROIC
      28.95%
      -0.21%
      ROE
      31.83%
      36.56%
      Gross Margin
      56.60%
      N/A
      PEG Ratio
      N/A
      Balance Sheet Safety
      0.37
      Debt / Equity
      0.36
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      0.77
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      -0.00
      N/A
      Dividend Yield
      N/A
      INTC: 0Ties: 2LULU: 7
      INTCLULU

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      INTC

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

      LULU

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      INTC
      N/A
      Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
      Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
      Σ Retained
      $-22.02B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$74.94B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      LULU
      $-3.78
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Market Cap Declined
      Σ Retained
      $4.22B
      Δ Market Cap
      $-15.97B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      INTC
      Insufficient Data
      Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
      Current Price: $46.18
      Fair Value: $0.00
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      LULU
      51.8% Margin of Safety
      Price is 51.8% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $165.57
      Fair Value: $343.57
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      INTC

      Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

      LULU

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $166?

      -0.8%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +1.2%

      The market implies -0.8% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

      Standard FCF implies a more demanding +1.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      INTC
      17/100
      No Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
      LULU
      92/100
      Wide Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      INTC
      -2.59
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      LULU
      -2.49
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      INTC
      Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
      No. of Institutional Holders3,156
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      LULU
      Insiders 4.7%Institutions 83.4%Retail & Other 11.9%
      No. of Institutional Holders1,449
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      INTC
      1
      Buys (3M)
      1
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $249,985
      ZINSNER DAVID A
      Chief Financial Officer
      $249,985
      @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
      GELSINGER PATRICK P
      Chief Executive Officer
      $251,198
      @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
      GELSINGER PATRICK P
      Chief Executive Officer
      $251,946
      @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
      GELSINGER PATRICK P
      Chief Executive Officer
      $124,173
      @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
      GELSINGER PATRICK P
      Chief Executive Officer
      $125,674
      @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      LULU
      0
      Buys (3M)
      0
      Buys (12M)
      MCDONALD CALVIN
      Chief Executive Officer
      $1.04M
      @ $260.00 · 2024-09-03
      MORFITT MARTHA A M
      Director
      $1.44M
      @ $389.05 · 2024-03-27
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      INTC
      1
      Sells (3M)
      1
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $981,000
      MILLER BOISE APRIL
      Officer
      $981,000
      @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
      HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
      General Counsel
      $650,000
      @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      LULU
      1
      Sells (3M)
      4
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $9.80M
      FRANK MEGHAN
      Chief Financial Officer
      $561,821
      @ $211.37 · 2025-12-30
      BURGOYNE CELESTE
      Officer
      $2.76M
      @ $204.00 · 2025-12-16
      NEUBURGER NICOLE
      Officer
      $109,470
      @ $178.00 · 2025-09-30
      MCDONALD CALVIN
      Chief Executive Officer
      $6.38M
      @ $235.69 · 2025-06-27
      NEUBURGER NICOLE
      Officer
      $782,735
      @ $387.11 · 2024-12-26
      BURGOYNE CELESTE
      Officer
      $10.09M
      @ $405.54 · 2024-12-09
      NEUBURGER NICOLE
      Officer
      $131,021
      @ $269.59 · 2024-09-26
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      INTC
      FearGreed
      😐Neutral(53/100)

      "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      LULU
      FearGreed
      😨Fear(30/100)

      "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      INTC
      ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
      LULU
      ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (30)
      View INTC Full AnalysisView LULU Full Analysis