Compare StocksINTC vs LII

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Lennox International Inc. (LII)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$99.61
VS
LII
Lennox International Inc.
$526.33

Rewards

INTC
    LII
    • Lennox International Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • Lennox International Inc. scores 74/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • Free cash flow has grown at a 47.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    LII
    • Beneish M-Score of -1.37 flags financial patterns consistent with potential earnings manipulation — warrants further investigation.
    • 13 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    LII
    Valuation
    $-8.30B
    Free Cash Flow
    $638.80M
    -1.66%
    FCF Yield
    3.49%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    23.36
    66.78
    Forward P/E
    19.77
    Quality & Moat
    1.72%
    ROIC
    18.77%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    66.38%
    37.20%
    Gross Margin
    33.19%
    1.36
    PEG Ratio
    1.52
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.36
    Debt / Equity
    1.61
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.86
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.65
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    0.99%
    INTC: 4Ties: 1LII: 5
    INTCLII

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    LII

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    LII
    $4.89
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $1.72B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$8.41B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $99.61
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    LII
    4.5% Overvalued
    Price is 4.5% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $526.33
    Fair Value: $503.50
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    LII

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $526?

    +10.8%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +13.9%

    The market implies +10.8% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +13.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    LII
    74/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    LII
    -1.37
    Likely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,201
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    LII
    Insiders 9.6%Institutions 79.0%Retail & Other 11.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders937
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    LII
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    LII
    3
    Sells (3M)
    13
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $24.75M
    WALL SHANE D.
    Director
    $54,001
    @ $540.01 · 2026-02-25
    TESKE TODD J
    Director
    $373,415
    @ $533.45 · 2026-02-04
    KOSEL CHRIS A
    Officer
    $136,271
    @ $536.50 · 2026-02-04
    TESKE TODD J
    Director
    $295,110
    @ $491.85 · 2025-11-11
    KOSEL CHRIS A
    Officer
    $177,558
    @ $591.86 · 2025-08-22
    QUINTOS KAREN H.
    Director
    $657,665
    @ $607.82 · 2025-08-20
    QUINTOS KAREN H.
    Director
    $222,394
    @ $609.30 · 2025-08-20
    SESSA DANIEL M
    Officer
    $1.86M
    @ $670.04 · 2025-07-23
    NORRIS JOHN W III
    Director
    $14.88M
    @ $666.20 · 2025-07-23
    NORRIS JOHN W III
    Director
    $1.96M
    @ $613.72 · 2025-07-10
    NORRIS JOHN W III
    Director
    $1.93M
    @ $606.00 · 2025-07-03
    NORRIS JOHN W III
    Director
    $1.91M
    @ $600.00 · 2025-07-01
    KOSEL CHRIS A
    Officer
    $289,140
    @ $568.06 · 2025-05-07
    KOSEL CHRIS A
    Officer
    $124,975
    @ $644.20 · 2025-02-21
    TORRES JOHN D
    Officer
    $1.04M
    @ $582.55 · 2025-02-04
    BUCK SHERRY L
    Director
    $330,370
    @ $660.74 · 2024-11-27
    TESKE TODD J
    Director
    $337,760
    @ $675.52 · 2024-11-25
    KOSEL CHRIS A
    Officer
    $125,098
    @ $625.49 · 2024-11-13
    NASSAB JOSEPH
    Officer
    $398,091
    @ $619.12 · 2024-11-05
    BEDAPUDI PRAKASH
    Chief Technology Officer
    $596,370
    @ $618.00 · 2024-11-05
    WALL SHANE D.
    Director
    $199,215
    @ $612.97 · 2024-10-28
    TORRES JOHN D
    Officer
    $360,789
    @ $620.98 · 2024-10-25
    BEDAPUDI PRAKASH
    Chief Technology Officer
    $3.14M
    @ $584.00 · 2024-08-28
    BUCK SHERRY L
    Director
    $291,735
    @ $583.47 · 2024-08-23
    NORRIS JOHN W III
    Director
    $976,412
    @ $574.36 · 2024-08-20
    QUINTOS KAREN H.
    Director
    $1.02M
    @ $574.87 · 2024-08-20
    TESKE TODD J
    Director
    $1.15M
    @ $574.05 · 2024-08-19
    BEDARD GARY S
    Officer
    $685,351
    @ $576.41 · 2024-08-19
    WALL SHANE D.
    Director
    $201,831
    @ $576.66 · 2024-08-19
    BEDAPUDI PRAKASH
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.98M
    @ $578.00 · 2024-08-19
    NASSAB JOSEPH
    Officer
    $664,195
    @ $570.12 · 2024-08-16
    TORRES JOHN D
    Officer
    $4.12M
    @ $571.21 · 2024-08-16
    SESSA DANIEL M
    Officer
    $7.68M
    @ $570.97 · 2024-08-16
    KOSEL CHRIS A
    Officer
    $1.00M
    @ $573.79 · 2024-07-26
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(74/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    LII
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(45/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
    LII
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (45)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView LII Full Analysis
    INTC vs LII: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io