Compare StocksINTC vs LII

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Lennox International Inc. (LII): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, INTC is overvalued at $134, with a DCF intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -1513%. LII is fairly valued at $532, with an intrinsic value of $506 and a margin of safety of -5%. Of the two, LII has the wider margin of safety.

INTC
Intel Corporation
$133.99
VS
LII
Lennox International Inc.
$532.43

Rewards

INTC
    LII
    • Lennox International Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • Lennox International Inc. scores 74/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • Free cash flow has grown at a 47.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    • Insiders have sold $6.5M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
    LII
    • High leverage (1.57x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • Beneish M-Score of -1.37 flags financial patterns consistent with potential earnings manipulation — warrants further investigation.
    • 13 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    LII
    Valuation
    $-8.30B
    Free Cash Flow
    $638.80M
    -1.23%
    FCF Yield
    3.45%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    23.65
    86.70
    Forward P/E
    19.95
    Quality & Moat
    1.72%
    ROIC
    18.77%
    -2.91%
    ROE
    76.79%
    37.20%
    Gross Margin
    33.19%
    1.36
    PEG Ratio
    1.52
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.10
    Net Debt / Equity
    1.57
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.86
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.65
    0.00%
    Dividend Yield
    1.03%
    INTC: 4Ties: 1LII: 6
    INTCLII

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    LII

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    LII
    $4.89
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $1.72B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$8.41B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $133.99
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    LII
    5.2% Overvalued
    Price is 5.2% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $532.43
    Fair Value: $506.12
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    LII

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $532?

    +10.9%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +14.1%

    The market implies +10.9% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +14.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    LII
    74/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.83
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    LII
    -1.37
    Likely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 14.7%Institutions 64.0%Retail & Other 21.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,349
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    LII
    Insiders 9.6%Institutions 79.4%Retail & Other 11.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders939
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    LII
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    2
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.47M
    CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $4.01M
    @ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    LII
    1
    Sells (3M)
    13
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $24.99M
    KOSEL CHRIS A
    Officer
    $529,001
    @ $544.80 · 2026-05-06
    WALL SHANE D.
    Director
    $54,001
    @ $540.01 · 2026-02-25
    TESKE TODD J
    Director
    $373,415
    @ $533.45 · 2026-02-04
    KOSEL CHRIS A
    Officer
    $136,271
    @ $536.50 · 2026-02-04
    TESKE TODD J
    Director
    $295,110
    @ $491.85 · 2025-11-11
    KOSEL CHRIS A
    Officer
    $177,558
    @ $591.86 · 2025-08-22
    QUINTOS KAREN H.
    Director
    $657,665
    @ $607.82 · 2025-08-20
    QUINTOS KAREN H.
    Director
    $222,394
    @ $609.30 · 2025-08-20
    SESSA DANIEL M
    Officer
    $1.86M
    @ $670.04 · 2025-07-23
    NORRIS JOHN W III
    Director
    $14.88M
    @ $666.20 · 2025-07-23
    NORRIS JOHN W III
    Director
    $1.96M
    @ $613.72 · 2025-07-10
    NORRIS JOHN W III
    Director
    $1.93M
    @ $606.00 · 2025-07-03
    NORRIS JOHN W III
    Director
    $1.91M
    @ $600.00 · 2025-07-01
    KOSEL CHRIS A
    Officer
    $289,140
    @ $568.06 · 2025-05-07
    KOSEL CHRIS A
    Officer
    $124,975
    @ $644.20 · 2025-02-21
    TORRES JOHN D
    Officer
    $1.04M
    @ $582.55 · 2025-02-04
    BUCK SHERRY L
    Director
    $330,370
    @ $660.74 · 2024-11-27
    TESKE TODD J
    Director
    $337,760
    @ $675.52 · 2024-11-25
    KOSEL CHRIS A
    Officer
    $125,098
    @ $625.49 · 2024-11-13
    NASSAB JOSEPH
    Officer
    $398,091
    @ $619.12 · 2024-11-05
    BEDAPUDI PRAKASH
    Chief Technology Officer
    $596,370
    @ $618.00 · 2024-11-05
    WALL SHANE D.
    Director
    $199,215
    @ $612.97 · 2024-10-28
    TORRES JOHN D
    Officer
    $360,789
    @ $620.98 · 2024-10-25
    BEDAPUDI PRAKASH
    Chief Technology Officer
    $3.14M
    @ $584.00 · 2024-08-28
    BUCK SHERRY L
    Director
    $291,735
    @ $583.47 · 2024-08-23
    QUINTOS KAREN H.
    Director
    $1.02M
    @ $574.87 · 2024-08-20
    NORRIS JOHN W III
    Director
    $976,412
    @ $574.36 · 2024-08-20
    TESKE TODD J
    Director
    $1.15M
    @ $574.05 · 2024-08-19
    BEDARD GARY S
    Officer
    $685,351
    @ $576.41 · 2024-08-19
    WALL SHANE D.
    Director
    $201,831
    @ $576.66 · 2024-08-19
    BEDAPUDI PRAKASH
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.98M
    @ $578.00 · 2024-08-19
    NASSAB JOSEPH
    Officer
    $664,195
    @ $570.12 · 2024-08-16
    SESSA DANIEL M
    Officer
    $7.68M
    @ $570.97 · 2024-08-16
    TORRES JOHN D
    Officer
    $4.12M
    @ $571.21 · 2024-08-16
    KOSEL CHRIS A
    Officer
    $1.00M
    @ $573.79 · 2024-07-26
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(65/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    LII
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(43/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
    LII
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (43)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView LII Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: INTC vs LII

    Is Intel Corporation or Lennox International Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, LII trades at a -5.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $506 vs. price $532), compared to INTC's -1512.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $134).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intel Corporation or Lennox International Inc.?

    LII scores 74/100 (Wide moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Intel Corporation in financial distress?

    INTC's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. LII scores 7.5 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Intel Corporation or Lennox International Inc.?

    Lennox International Inc. (LII) generates a 3.4% free cash flow yield, compared to Intel Corporation's -1.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intel Corporation or Lennox International Inc.?

    LII earns 18.8% ROIC versus INTC's 1.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Does Lennox International Inc. have accounting red flags?

    LII's Beneish M-Score of -1.4 flags it as a likely earnings manipulator (above the -1.78 threshold). By contrast, INTC scores -2.8, within the normal range. The Beneish model detects aggressive accounting through eight financial ratios.

    INTC vs LII: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io