Compare StocksINTC vs LHX

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18
VS
LHX
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
$363.70

Rewards

INTC
    LHX
    • Free cash flow has grown at a 12.1% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $9.04 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    LHX
    • Trailing P/E of 42.5x is 30% above the historical average of 32.7x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    • Insiders have sold $6.8M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    LHX
    Valuation
    $-4.50B
    Free Cash Flow
    $2.73B
    -1.95%
    FCF Yield
    4.01%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    42.54
    46.59
    Forward P/E
    26.72
    Quality & Moat
    1.24%
    ROIC
    7.05%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    8.18%
    36.56%
    Gross Margin
    25.73%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.37
    Debt / Equity
    0.61
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.77
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.68
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    1.37%
    INTC: 3Ties: 1LHX: 5
    INTCLHX

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    LHX

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    LHX
    $9.04
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $1.68B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$15.16B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    LHX
    55.1% Overvalued
    Price is 55.1% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $363.70
    Fair Value: $234.57
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    LHX

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $364?

    +19.9%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +12.7%

    The market implies +19.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +12.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    LHX
    61/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    LHX
    -2.38
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    LHX
    Insiders 0.4%Institutions 89.5%Retail & Other 10.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,980
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    LHX
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    LHX
    4
    Sells (3M)
    10
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $73.91M
    RAMBEAU JON
    Officer
    $2.05M
    @ $370.32 · 2026-03-02
    MEHTA SAMIR
    Officer
    $2.05M
    @ $370.32 · 2026-03-02
    RAKITA MELANIE
    Officer
    $1.09M
    @ $348.38 · 2026-03-02
    MEHTA SAMIR
    Officer
    $1.64M
    @ $338.85 · 2026-02-05
    KUBASIK CHRISTOPHER E
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.27M
    @ $301.05 · 2025-11-13
    KUBASIK CHRISTOPHER E
    Chief Executive Officer
    $23.23M
    @ $279.90 · 2025-09-12
    KUBASIK CHRISTOPHER E
    Chief Executive Officer
    $10.82M
    @ $269.52 · 2025-08-11
    KUBASIK CHRISTOPHER E
    Chief Executive Officer
    $19.52M
    @ $271.14 · 2025-07-29
    KUBASIK CHRISTOPHER E
    Chief Executive Officer
    $8.76M
    @ $248.39 · 2025-06-12
    ZOISS EDWARD J
    President
    $490,000
    @ $245.00 · 2025-05-27
    RAMBEAU JON
    Officer
    $718,228
    @ $226.00 · 2025-03-10
    ZOISS EDWARD J
    Officer
    $1.09M
    @ $211.68 · 2025-03-07
    NIEBERGALL ROSS S.
    Officer
    $288,412
    @ $210.06 · 2024-12-30
    NIEBERGALL ROSS S.
    Officer
    $376,879
    @ $213.65 · 2024-12-23
    NIEBERGALL ROSS S.
    Officer
    $394,466
    @ $223.62 · 2024-12-16
    NIEBERGALL ROSS S.
    Officer
    $845,000
    @ $260.00 · 2024-11-08
    NIEBERGALL ROSS S.
    Officer
    $740,815
    @ $247.93 · 2024-11-04
    KUBASIK CHRISTOPHER E
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.30M
    @ $248.11 · 2024-10-31
    NIEBERGALL ROSS S.
    Officer
    $731,104
    @ $244.68 · 2024-10-02
    NIEBERGALL ROSS S.
    Officer
    $707,200
    @ $236.68 · 2024-09-03
    MIKUEN SCOTT T
    General Counsel
    $6.15M
    @ $233.01 · 2024-07-15
    STACKLEY SEAN J.
    Officer
    $1.46M
    @ $217.36 · 2024-06-17
    KUBASIK CHRISTOPHER E
    Chief Executive Officer
    $11.47M
    @ $224.11 · 2024-06-04
    KUBASIK CHRISTOPHER E
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.63M
    @ $225.11 · 2024-05-22
    KUBASIK CHRISTOPHER E
    Chief Executive Officer
    $9.81M
    @ $212.18 · 2024-03-26
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    LHX
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(63/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    LHX
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView LHX Full Analysis
    Intel Corporation (INTC) vs L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io