Compare StocksINTC vs LDOS

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18
VS
LDOS
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
$165.95

Rewards

INTC
    LDOS
    • Leidos Holdings, Inc. scores 82/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • Free cash flow has grown at a 23.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.68 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    LDOS
    • Gross margin of 18.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • FCF yield of 7.7% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    • 9 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    LDOS
    Valuation
    $-4.50B
    Free Cash Flow
    $1.63B
    -1.95%
    FCF Yield
    7.66%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    14.90
    46.59
    Forward P/E
    12.90
    Quality & Moat
    1.24%
    ROIC
    14.80%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    29.18%
    36.56%
    Gross Margin
    18.05%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    0.76
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.37
    Debt / Equity
    1.08
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.77
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.77
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    1.00%
    INTC: 3Ties: 1LDOS: 5
    INTCLDOS

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    LDOS

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    LDOS
    $3.68
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $2.28B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$8.39B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    LDOS
    11.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 11.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $165.95
    Fair Value: $186.39
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    LDOS

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $166?

    +6.0%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +4.4%

    The market implies +6.0% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +4.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    LDOS
    82/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    LDOS
    -2.61
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    LDOS
    Insiders 0.7%Institutions 81.0%Retail & Other 18.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,274
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    LDOS
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    GEER NOEL BROWN
    Director
    $322,261
    @ $161.13 · 2024-11-20
    BELL THOMAS ARTHUR
    Chief Executive Officer
    $248,305
    @ $145.04 · 2024-08-01
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    LDOS
    1
    Sells (3M)
    9
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $8.18M
    PORTER ELIZABETH A
    Officer
    $576,635
    @ $192.21 · 2026-01-20
    PORTER ELIZABETH A
    Officer
    $543,130
    @ $181.04 · 2025-12-19
    HULL STEPHEN EDWARD
    Officer
    $2.23M
    @ $178.14 · 2025-09-04
    STEVENS ROY E
    Officer
    $493,398
    @ $181.66 · 2025-08-25
    HULL STEPHEN EDWARD
    Officer
    $2.30M
    @ $178.27 · 2025-08-20
    DAHLBERG GREGORY R.
    Director
    $168,911
    @ $177.43 · 2025-08-11
    MAY GARY STEPHEN
    Director
    $356,104
    @ $178.05 · 2025-08-11
    HULL STEPHEN EDWARD
    Officer
    $1.33M
    @ $176.39 · 2025-08-08
    DAHLBERG GREGORY R.
    Director
    $193,190
    @ $154.55 · 2025-05-09
    MAY GARY STEPHEN
    Director
    $279,279
    @ $131.24 · 2025-02-18
    KOVARIK ROBERT C JR
    Director
    $203,322
    @ $134.56 · 2025-02-13
    STEVENS ROY E
    Officer
    $229,219
    @ $201.60 · 2024-11-12
    MOHAPATRA SURYA N
    Director
    $535,784
    @ $194.97 · 2024-11-07
    KOVARIK ROBERT C JR
    Director
    $193,632
    @ $184.94 · 2024-10-31
    MAY GARY STEPHEN
    Director
    $144,017
    @ $144.02 · 2024-08-13
    KOVARIK ROBERT C JR
    Director
    $153,799
    @ $145.23 · 2024-08-01
    STEVENS ROY E
    Officer
    $131,836
    @ $150.67 · 2024-05-24
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    LDOS
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(43/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    LDOS
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (43)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView LDOS Full Analysis
    Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io