Compare StocksINTC vs L

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Loews Corporation (L)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18
VS
L
Loews Corporation
$105.65

Rewards

INTC
    L
    • Share count has been reduced by 13% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.82 of market value — management is creating shareholder value.
    • FCF yield of 12.4% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    L
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.69 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    • 17 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    L
    Valuation
    $-4.50B
    Free Cash Flow
    $2.70B
    -1.95%
    FCF Yield
    12.37%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    13.26
    46.59
    Forward P/E
    36.43
    Quality & Moat
    1.24%
    ROIC
    6.46%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    -4.74%
    36.56%
    Gross Margin
    36.50%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    0.11
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.37
    Debt / Equity
    0.50
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.77
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.83
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    0.24%
    INTC: 3Ties: 2L: 4
    INTCL

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    L

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    L
    $1.82
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $4.35B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$7.93B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    L
    81.6% Margin of Safety
    Price is 81.6% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $105.65
    Fair Value: $573.43
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    L

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $106?

    +3.5%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -3.2%

    The market implies +3.5% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -3.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    L
    39/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    L
    -2.53
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    L
    Insiders 19.0%Institutions 60.4%Retail & Other 20.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,049
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    L
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    LOCKER JONATHAN C.
    Director
    $499,896
    @ $80.63 · 2024-07-30
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    L
    3
    Sells (3M)
    17
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $3.46M
    SCHWARTZ MARK S
    Officer and Treasurer
    $346,500
    @ $110.00 · 2026-02-17
    ALPERT MARC A
    General Counsel
    $383,983
    @ $109.87 · 2026-02-10
    BERMAN ANN E
    Director
    $211,728
    @ $110.16 · 2026-02-10
    SCOTT RICHARD WALDO
    Chief Investment Officer
    $104,740
    @ $104.74 · 2025-12-11
    FRIBOURG PAUL J
    Director
    $155,923
    @ $108.13 · 2025-12-01
    BERMAN ANN E
    Director
    $156,096
    @ $108.10 · 2025-12-01
    HARRIS WALTER L
    Director
    $155,563
    @ $107.88 · 2025-12-01
    DIKER CHARLES M
    Director
    $155,635
    @ $107.93 · 2025-12-01
    FRIBOURG PAUL J
    Director
    $137,493
    @ $96.69 · 2025-09-02
    BERMAN ANN E
    Director
    $137,465
    @ $96.67 · 2025-09-02
    HARRIS WALTER L
    Director
    $137,396
    @ $96.69 · 2025-09-02
    DIKER CHARLES M
    Director
    $137,593
    @ $96.76 · 2025-09-02
    FRIBOURG PAUL J
    Director
    $113,068
    @ $88.82 · 2025-06-03
    BERMAN ANN E
    Director
    $113,068
    @ $88.82 · 2025-06-02
    HARRIS WALTER L
    Director
    $113,157
    @ $88.82 · 2025-06-02
    DIKER CHARLES M
    Director
    $112,583
    @ $88.37 · 2025-06-02
    SCOTT RICHARD WALDO
    Chief Investment Officer
    $792,950
    @ $87.92 · 2025-05-08
    FRIBOURG PAUL J
    Director
    $104,007
    @ $86.89 · 2025-03-03
    BERMAN ANN E
    Director
    $104,019
    @ $86.90 · 2025-03-03
    WELTERS ANTHONY
    Director
    $103,983
    @ $86.87 · 2025-03-03
    DIKER CHARLES M
    Director
    $103,816
    @ $86.73 · 2025-03-03
    HARRIS WALTER L
    Director
    $103,983
    @ $86.87 · 2025-03-03
    SCOTT RICHARD WALDO
    Chief Investment Officer
    $689,405
    @ $84.60 · 2025-02-25
    ALPERT MARC A
    General Counsel
    $382,680
    @ $85.04 · 2025-02-11
    TISCH JONATHAN M.
    Retired
    $639,494
    @ $86.81 · 2025-02-07
    TISCH ANDREW H
    Divisional Officer
    $1.37M
    @ $84.67 · 2025-01-03
    TISCH JONATHAN M.
    Divisional Officer
    $1.38M
    @ $84.86 · 2025-01-02
    BERMAN ANN E
    Director
    $99,106
    @ $86.48 · 2024-12-02
    WELTERS ANTHONY
    Director
    $99,484
    @ $86.81 · 2024-12-02
    HARRIS WALTER L
    Director
    $99,278
    @ $86.63 · 2024-12-02
    DIKER CHARLES M
    Director
    $99,507
    @ $86.83 · 2024-12-02
    FRIBOURG PAUL J
    Director
    $99,484
    @ $86.81 · 2024-12-02
    FRIBOURG PAUL J
    Director
    $88,574
    @ $81.41 · 2024-09-03
    BERMAN ANN E
    Director
    $88,460
    @ $81.38 · 2024-09-03
    WELTERS ANTHONY
    Director
    $88,574
    @ $81.41 · 2024-09-03
    HARRIS WALTER L
    Director
    $88,574
    @ $81.41 · 2024-09-03
    DIKER CHARLES M
    Director
    $88,531
    @ $81.37 · 2024-09-03
    SIEGEL KENNETH I
    Officer
    $560,909
    @ $80.21 · 2024-08-23
    ALPERT MARC A
    General Counsel
    $540,470
    @ $77.21 · 2024-08-12
    ALPERT MARC A
    General Counsel
    $217,083
    @ $80.79 · 2024-07-30
    SCHWARTZ MARK S
    Officer and Treasurer
    $212,553
    @ $80.88 · 2024-07-30
    FRIBOURG PAUL J
    Director
    $72,995
    @ $75.80 · 2024-06-03
    BERMAN ANN E
    Director
    $72,995
    @ $75.80 · 2024-06-03
    WELTERS ANTHONY
    Director
    $72,995
    @ $75.80 · 2024-06-03
    HARRIS WALTER L
    Director
    $72,995
    @ $75.80 · 2024-06-03
    DIKER CHARLES M
    Director
    $72,987
    @ $75.79 · 2024-06-03
    SCOTT RICHARD WALDO
    Chief Investment Officer
    $690,495
    @ $76.34 · 2024-05-21
    TISCH JONATHAN M.
    President
    $3.88M
    @ $77.60 · 2024-05-17
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    L
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(55/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    L
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (55)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView L Full Analysis
    Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Loews Corporation (L) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io