Compare StocksINTC vs KR

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs The Kroger Co. (KR)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18
VS
KR
The Kroger Co.
$73.76

Rewards

INTC
    KR
    • The Kroger Co. scores 71/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • Share count has been reduced by 16% over the past 5 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.87 of market value — management is creating shareholder value.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    KR
    • Gross margin of 23.3% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • FCF yield of 7.6% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    • Trailing P/E of 47.9x is 92% above the historical average of 24.9x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    KR
    Valuation
    $-4.50B
    Free Cash Flow
    $3.43B
    -1.95%
    FCF Yield
    7.58%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    47.90
    46.59
    Forward P/E
    13.12
    Quality & Moat
    1.24%
    ROIC
    13.39%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    17.12%
    36.56%
    Gross Margin
    23.30%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    0.96
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.37
    Debt / Equity
    4.16
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.77
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.68
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    1.90%
    INTC: 3Ties: 1KR: 5
    INTCKR

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    KR

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    KR
    $1.87
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $4.71B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$8.80B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    KR
    9.3% Margin of Safety
    Price is 9.3% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $73.76
    Fair Value: $81.32
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    KR

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $74?

    +7.3%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    KR
    71/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. ROIC Consistency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    KR
    -2.90
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    KR
    Insiders 9.1%Institutions 81.6%Retail & Other 9.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,815
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    KR
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    KR
    0
    Sells (3M)
    16
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $27.44M
    MOORE CLYDE R
    Director
    $272,834
    @ $71.61 · 2025-07-16
    MOORE CLYDE R
    Director
    $1.89M
    @ $70.50 · 2025-07-11
    ADCOCK MARY ELLEN
    Officer
    $2.44M
    @ $71.16 · 2025-06-27
    ARREAGA GABRIEL
    Officer
    $2.75M
    @ $72.44 · 2025-06-25
    MASSA TIMOTHY A
    Officer
    $622,710
    @ $74.00 · 2025-06-23
    COSSET YAEL
    Officer
    $5.23M
    @ $73.49 · 2025-06-23
    FIKE CARIN L
    Officer and Treasurer
    $1.22M
    @ $73.79 · 2025-06-23
    WHEATLEY CHRISTINE STRICK
    Officer
    $2.16M
    @ $72.07 · 2025-04-23
    MASSA TIMOTHY A
    Officer
    $1.65M
    @ $73.00 · 2025-04-22
    COSSET YAEL
    Officer
    $2.19M
    @ $73.00 · 2025-04-22
    ARREAGA GABRIEL
    Officer
    $995,866
    @ $71.82 · 2025-04-21
    NICHOLS BRIAN W
    Officer
    $72,030
    @ $72.03 · 2025-04-21
    FOLEY TODD A
    Officer
    $989,442
    @ $70.67 · 2025-04-17
    JABBAR VALERIE L
    Officer
    $2.16M
    @ $69.08 · 2025-04-16
    WHEATLEY CHRISTINE STRICK
    Officer
    $2.08M
    @ $69.44 · 2025-04-04
    KIMBALL KENNETH C.
    Officer
    $719,081
    @ $65.37 · 2025-03-21
    ARREAGA GABRIEL
    Officer
    $1.05M
    @ $65.63 · 2025-03-19
    NICHOLS BRIAN W
    Officer
    $94,933
    @ $65.88 · 2025-03-17
    COSSET YAEL
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.17M
    @ $66.19 · 2025-03-17
    COSSET YAEL
    Chief Technology Officer
    $691,190
    @ $65.76 · 2025-03-14
    NICHOLS BRIAN W
    Officer
    $86,723
    @ $66.71 · 2025-03-13
    MASSA TIMOTHY A
    Officer
    $1.97M
    @ $66.56 · 2025-03-13
    ADCOCK MARY ELLEN
    Officer
    $6.90M
    @ $66.39 · 2025-03-13
    COSSET YAEL
    Chief Investment Officer
    $7.84M
    @ $68.08 · 2025-03-10
    FOLEY TODD A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.87M
    @ $66.62 · 2025-03-07
    FOLEY TODD A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.04M
    @ $61.44 · 2024-12-19
    AITKEN STUART W
    Officer
    $8.38M
    @ $63.18 · 2024-12-12
    COSSET YAEL
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.17M
    @ $58.39 · 2024-12-10
    COSSET YAEL
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.76M
    @ $58.54 · 2024-12-09
    MASSA TIMOTHY A
    Officer
    $1.56M
    @ $60.12 · 2024-12-06
    NICHOLS BRIAN W
    Officer
    $386,248
    @ $55.80 · 2024-10-07
    JABBAR VALERIE L
    Officer
    $167,730
    @ $55.91 · 2024-09-23
    NICHOLS BRIAN W
    Officer
    $222,800
    @ $55.70 · 2024-09-17
    FIKE CARIN L
    Officer and Treasurer
    $167,269
    @ $55.57 · 2024-09-17
    NICHOLS BRIAN W
    Officer
    $109,060
    @ $54.53 · 2024-07-19
    FOLEY TODD A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $368,467
    @ $55.69 · 2024-04-26
    KIMBALL KENNETH C.
    Officer
    $1.69M
    @ $55.98 · 2024-04-25
    JABBAR VALERIE L
    Officer
    $832,800
    @ $55.52 · 2024-04-23
    MASSA TIMOTHY A
    Officer
    $1.71M
    @ $57.18 · 2024-04-23
    ADCOCK MARY ELLEN
    Officer
    $4.61M
    @ $55.61 · 2024-04-23
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    KR
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(64/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    KR
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView KR Full Analysis
    Intel Corporation (INTC) vs The Kroger Co. (KR) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io