Compare StocksINTC vs KLAC

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs KLA Corporation (KLAC)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18
VS
KLAC
KLA Corporation
$1511.52

Rewards

INTC
    KLAC
    • KLA Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • Gross margin of 61.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • KLA Corporation scores 85/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    KLAC
    • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    • Trailing P/E of 44.1x is 70% above the historical average of 25.9x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    • 18 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    KLAC
    Valuation
    $-4.50B
    Free Cash Flow
    $3.22B
    -1.95%
    FCF Yield
    1.62%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    44.05
    46.59
    Forward P/E
    31.69
    Quality & Moat
    1.24%
    ROIC
    35.93%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    74.31%
    36.56%
    Gross Margin
    61.57%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    1.08
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.37
    Debt / Equity
    1.12
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.77
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.16
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    0.50%
    INTC: 1Ties: 1KLAC: 7
    INTCKLAC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    KLAC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    KLAC
    $13.71
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $7.80B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$106.95B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    KLAC
    32.5% Margin of Safety
    Price is 32.5% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $1511.52
    Fair Value: $2240.58
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    KLAC

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $1512?

    +20.0%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +23.1%

    The market implies +20.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +23.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    KLAC
    85/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    KLAC
    -2.24
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    KLAC
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 93.9%Retail & Other 6.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,619
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    KLAC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    KLAC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    18
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $70.12M
    HIGGINS BREN D.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.79M
    @ $1237.01 · 2025-12-16
    WALLACE RICHARD P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $13.00M
    @ $1203.10 · 2025-11-11
    KHAN AHMAD A
    Officer
    $4.11M
    @ $900.00 · 2025-09-05
    KHAN AHMAD A
    Officer
    $12.09M
    @ $881.50 · 2025-08-29
    HIGGINS BREN D.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.02M
    @ $878.53 · 2025-08-20
    LORIG BRIAN W.
    Officer
    $7.35M
    @ $913.68 · 2025-08-12
    WALLACE RICHARD P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $9.87M
    @ $913.68 · 2025-08-12
    KIRLOSKAR VIRENDRA A
    Officer
    $308,594
    @ $913.00 · 2025-08-08
    WILKINSON MARY BETH
    Officer
    $933,086
    @ $913.00 · 2025-08-08
    KIRLOSKAR VIRENDRA A
    Officer
    $468,587
    @ $917.00 · 2025-08-05
    WILKINSON MARY BETH
    Officer
    $1.76M
    @ $917.00 · 2025-08-05
    KIRLOSKAR VIRENDRA A
    Officer
    $286,960
    @ $896.75 · 2025-08-04
    WILKINSON MARY BETH
    Officer
    $684,220
    @ $896.75 · 2025-08-04
    KIRLOSKAR VIRENDRA A
    Officer
    $34,768
    @ $891.49 · 2025-07-02
    WILKINSON MARY BETH
    Officer
    $1.18M
    @ $891.16 · 2025-06-30
    HIGGINS BREN D.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $781,023
    @ $766.46 · 2025-05-22
    WALLACE RICHARD P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $7.38M
    @ $683.30 · 2025-05-06
    HIGGINS BREN D.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $5.08M
    @ $724.62 · 2025-03-25
    WALLACE RICHARD P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $9.49M
    @ $663.01 · 2024-11-12
    KHAN AHMAD A
    Officer
    $7.92M
    @ $818.51 · 2024-08-19
    HIGGINS BREN D.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.97M
    @ $740.63 · 2024-08-07
    LORIG BRIAN W.
    Officer
    $1.51M
    @ $740.63 · 2024-08-07
    KIRLOSKAR VIRENDRA A
    Officer
    $573,878
    @ $705.01 · 2024-08-06
    LORIG BRIAN W.
    Officer
    $910,168
    @ $705.01 · 2024-08-06
    WALLACE RICHARD P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $12.29M
    @ $705.01 · 2024-08-06
    KIRLOSKAR VIRENDRA A
    Officer
    $536,118
    @ $649.84 · 2024-08-05
    LORIG BRIAN W.
    Officer
    $460,737
    @ $649.84 · 2024-08-05
    WILKINSON MARY BETH
    Officer
    $1.70M
    @ $652.17 · 2024-08-05
    KIRLOSKAR VIRENDRA A
    Officer
    $36,054
    @ $819.41 · 2024-07-02
    LORIG BRIAN W.
    Officer
    $36,054
    @ $819.41 · 2024-07-02
    HIGGINS BREN D.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $803,563
    @ $788.58 · 2024-05-23
    KHAN AHMAD A
    Officer
    $5.95M
    @ $760.00 · 2024-05-21
    WALLACE RICHARD P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $10.04M
    @ $716.63 · 2024-05-07
    LORIG BRIAN W.
    Officer
    $2.47M
    @ $699.16 · 2024-05-06
    HIGGINS BREN D.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $4.95M
    @ $705.04 · 2024-03-26
    DONZELLA ORESTE
    Officer
    $2.27M
    @ $697.85 · 2024-03-25
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    KLAC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(56/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    KLAC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (56)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView KLAC Full Analysis