Compare StocksINTC vs KEY

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs KeyCorp (KEY): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, INTC is overvalued at $134, with a DCF intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -1513%. KEY is undervalued at $23, with an intrinsic value of $51 and a margin of safety of 56%. Of the two, KEY has the wider margin of safety.

INTC
Intel Corporation
$133.99
VS
KEY
KeyCorp
$22.59

Risks

INTC
  • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • Insiders have sold $6.5M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
KEY
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Share count has increased by 18% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.24 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
INTC
KEY
Valuation
$-8.30B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
-1.23%
FCF Yield
N/A
N/A
Trailing P/E
13.86
86.70
Forward P/E
10.51
Quality & Moat
1.72%
ROIC
11.53%
-2.91%
ROE
9.98%
37.20%
Gross Margin
0.00%
1.36
PEG Ratio
1.74
Balance Sheet Safety
0.10
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.86
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
0.00%
Dividend Yield
3.63%
INTC: 2Ties: 1KEY: 4
INTCKEY

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
INTC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

KEY

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
INTC
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-22.02B
Δ Market Cap
+$74.94B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
KEY
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-257.0M
Δ Market Cap
+$6.50B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
INTC
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $133.99
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
KEY
56.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 56.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $22.59
Fair Value: $51.43
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
INTC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

KEY

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
INTC
17/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
KEY
47/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
INTC
-2.83
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
KEY
-2.60
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
INTC
Insiders 14.7%Institutions 64.0%Retail & Other 21.2%
No. of Institutional Holders3,349
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
KEY
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 88.9%Retail & Other 10.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,225
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
INTC
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $249,985
ZINSNER DAVID A
Chief Financial Officer
$249,985
@ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
GELSINGER PATRICK P
Chief Executive Officer
$251,198
@ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
GELSINGER PATRICK P
Chief Executive Officer
$251,946
@ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
KEY
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
ALLARD JACQUELINE
Director
$2,525
@ $14.03 · 2025-04-22
TOBIN RICHARD J.
Director
$10,380
@ $13.84 · 2025-04-21
KHANNA SOMESH
Director
$1,387
@ $13.87 · 2025-04-21
RAMANI MOHIT
Officer
$137,500
@ $13.75 · 2025-04-21
BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$892,500
@ $17.85 · 2025-02-05
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
INTC
2
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.47M
CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
Chief Technology Officer
$2.49M
@ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$4.01M
@ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$981,000
@ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
General Counsel
$650,000
@ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
KEY
2
Sells (3M)
9
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $8.77M
GILE ELIZABETH R
Director
$499,992
@ $20.88 · 2026-06-03
MAGO ANGELA G
Officer
$494,411
@ $21.66 · 2026-05-08
PAINE ANDREW J III
Officer
$1.53M
@ $23.23 · 2026-02-06
MAGO ANGELA G
Officer
$1.35M
@ $21.55 · 2026-01-29
EVANS KATRINA M.
Officer
$710,789
@ $21.74 · 2026-01-22
PAINE ANDREW J III
Officer
$867,143
@ $19.29 · 2025-09-09
BRADY AMY G
Chief Technology Officer
$880,500
@ $17.61 · 2025-08-08
EVANS KATRINA M.
Officer
$317,390
@ $18.67 · 2025-07-24
GORMAN CHRISTOPHER M
Chief Executive Officer
$2.12M
@ $18.86 · 2025-07-23
BRADY AMY G
Chief Technology Officer
$305,710
@ $16.09 · 2025-06-12
HIGHSMITH CARLTON LEE
Director
$83,000
@ $16.60 · 2025-05-13
KIDIK ALLYSON M
Officer
$17,973
@ $17.69 · 2025-02-14
GORMAN CHRISTOPHER M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.01M
@ $17.46 · 2025-02-13
MAGO ANGELA G
Officer
$294,065
@ $19.59 · 2024-11-06
PAINE ANDREW J III
Officer
$1.26M
@ $19.03 · 2024-11-06
HIGHSMITH CARLTON LEE
Director
$154,260
@ $17.14 · 2024-11-05
BRADY AMY G
Chief Technology Officer
$719,692
@ $16.92 · 2024-08-29
HIGHSMITH CARLTON LEE
Director
$162,100
@ $16.21 · 2024-08-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
INTC
FearGreed
😏Greed(65/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
KEY
FearGreed
😏Greed(70/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
INTC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
KEY
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (70)
View INTC Full AnalysisView KEY Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: INTC vs KEY

Is Intel Corporation or KeyCorp more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, KEY trades at a 56.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $51 vs. price $23), compared to INTC's -1512.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $134).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intel Corporation or KeyCorp?

KEY scores 47/100 (Narrow moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is KeyCorp in financial distress?

KEY's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTC scores 2.1 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intel Corporation or KeyCorp?

KEY earns 11.5% ROIC versus INTC's 1.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

INTC vs KEY: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io