Compare StocksINTC vs J

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18
VS
J
Jacobs Solutions Inc.
$128.02

Rewards

INTC
    J
    • Free cash flow has grown at a 20.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.33 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    J
    • Gross margin of 24.4% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • FCF yield of 7.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    J
    Valuation
    $-4.50B
    Free Cash Flow
    $1.09B
    -1.95%
    FCF Yield
    7.20%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    33.78
    46.59
    Forward P/E
    15.95
    Quality & Moat
    1.24%
    ROIC
    9.70%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    6.37%
    36.56%
    Gross Margin
    24.45%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.37
    Debt / Equity
    0.65
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.77
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.10
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    1.12%
    INTC: 3Ties: 1J: 5
    INTCJ

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    J

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    J
    $2.33
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $1.34B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$3.12B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    J
    126.2% Overvalued
    Price is 126.2% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $128.02
    Fair Value: $56.60
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    J

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $128?

    +22.0%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +4.0%

    The market implies +22.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    J
    62/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    J
    -2.53
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    J
    Insiders 0.6%Institutions 91.4%Retail & Other 8.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,245
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    J
    0
    Buys (3M)
    4
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $353,366
    ROBERTSON PETER J
    Director
    $134,760
    @ $134.76 · 2025-11-24
    FERNANDEZ MANUEL J
    Director
    $99,785
    @ $130.78 · 2025-11-24
    NATHAMUNI VENKATESH
    Chief Financial Officer
    $101,332
    @ $135.11 · 2025-11-24
    FERNANDEZ MANUEL J
    Director
    $17,489
    @ $120.61 · 2025-05-08
    FERNANDEZ MANUEL J
    Director
    $33,646
    @ $123.70 · 2025-03-07
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    J
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $193,147
    MILLER SHANNON
    President
    $193,147
    @ $134.13 · 2026-03-06
    THOMPSON CHRISTOPHER M T
    Director
    $286,320
    @ $150.85 · 2024-08-29
    EBERHART RALPH EDWARD
    Director
    $286,288
    @ $150.12 · 2024-08-29
    GUSTAFSON SHELETTE M.
    Officer
    $625,633
    @ $150.14 · 2024-08-29
    ALLEN WILLIAM B JR
    Officer
    $212,586
    @ $146.51 · 2024-08-16
    DEMETRIOU STEVEN J
    Officer and Director
    $1.03M
    @ $146.88 · 2024-08-01
    DEMETRIOU STEVEN J
    Officer and Director
    $979,580
    @ $139.94 · 2024-07-01
    DEMETRIOU STEVEN J
    Officer and Director
    $976,010
    @ $139.43 · 2024-06-03
    DEMETRIOU STEVEN J
    Officer and Director
    $1.01M
    @ $143.86 · 2024-05-01
    BERRYMAN KEVIN C
    Chief Financial Officer
    $217,965
    @ $145.31 · 2024-04-30
    BERRYMAN KEVIN C
    Chief Financial Officer
    $229,800
    @ $153.20 · 2024-04-01
    DEMETRIOU STEVEN J
    Officer and Director
    $1.07M
    @ $153.20 · 2024-04-01
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    J
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(37/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    J
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView J Full Analysis