Compare Stocks › INTC vs ISRG

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, INTC is overvalued at $66, with a DCF intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -697%. ISRG is overvalued at $432, with an intrinsic value of $259 and a margin of safety of -67%. Of the two, ISRG has the wider margin of safety.

INTC
Intel Corporation
$65.76
VS
ISRG
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
$432.01

Rewards

INTC
  • ★Net debt/EBITDA of -0.2x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
ISRG
  • ★Gross margin of 66.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Intuitive Surgical, Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 37.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

INTC
  • ⚠Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • ⚠Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 0.2% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
ISRG
  • ⚠FCF yield of 2.3% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠11 insider sales totaling $3.8M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
INTC
ISRG
Valuation
$670.37M
Free Cash Flow
$3.43B
0.19%
FCF Yield
2.25%
N/A
Trailing P/E
52.24
35.50
Forward P/E
34.69
Quality & Moat
4.06%
ROIC
N/A
-9.62%
ROE
17.93%
40.15%
Gross Margin
66.64%
1.36
PEG Ratio
2.00
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
No debt
-0.20
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.90
0.00%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
INTC: 1Ties: 1ISRG: 6
INTCISRG

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
INTC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

ISRG

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
INTC
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-22.02B
Δ Market Cap
+$74.94B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
ISRG
Not enough historical data to compute the retained earnings test.

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
INTC
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $65.76
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
ISRG
66.9% Overvalued
Price is 66.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $432.01
Fair Value: $258.87
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
INTC

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $66?

+54.7%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

ISRG

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $432?

+18.2%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market below historical growth — potential opportunity.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
INTC
17/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
ISRG
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
INTC
-2.83
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
ISRG

Insufficient data for Beneish M-Score calculation (requires 2+ years).

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
INTC
Insiders 13.9%Institutions 62.8%Retail & Other 23.3%
No. of Institutional Holders4,439
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
ISRG
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 91.4%Retail & Other 8.1%
No. of Institutional Holders3,136
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
INTC
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.25M
TAN LIP-BU
Chief Executive Officer
$10.00M
@ $95.00 · 2026-08-11
ZINSNER DAVID A
Chief Financial Officer
$249,985
@ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
GELSINGER PATRICK P
Chief Executive Officer
$251,198
@ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
ISRG
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
INTC
0
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.47M
CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
Chief Technology Officer
$2.49M
@ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$4.01M
@ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$981,000
@ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
General Counsel
$650,000
@ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
ISRG
11
Sells (3M)
39
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $40.13M
BROSIUS MARK PRESTON
Officer
$82,044
@ $448.33 · 2026-10-28
WIDMAN FREDRIK
Officer
$1.83M
@ $453.21 · 2026-10-23
WADORS PATRICIA L.
Officer
$478,416
@ $443.80 · 2026-10-23
BARRATT CRAIG H
Director
$510,370
@ $443.80 · 2026-10-23
WIDMAN FREDRIK
Officer
$407,765
@ $374.44 · 2026-09-15
BROSIUS MARK PRESTON
Officer
$17,141
@ $357.10 · 2026-09-11
BROSIUS MARK PRESTON
Officer
$24,671
@ $357.55 · 2026-09-09
BROSIUS MARK PRESTON
Officer
$59,439
@ $385.97 · 2026-08-21
BROSIUS MARK PRESTON
Officer
$90,778
@ $392.98 · 2026-08-19
LADD AMY L
Director
$179,903
@ $381.15 · 2026-08-11
LOEB GARY
Officer
$151,600
@ $379.00 · 2026-08-10
BROSIUS MARK PRESTON
Officer
$19,539
@ $348.91 · 2026-07-31
BROSIUS MARK PRESTON
Officer
$29,954
@ $356.60 · 2026-07-29
BROSIUS MARK PRESTON
Officer
$19,833
@ $413.19 · 2026-06-12
BROSIUS MARK PRESTON
Officer
$29,104
@ $421.80 · 2026-06-10
LOEB GARY
Officer
$169,656
@ $424.14 · 2026-06-10
JEDDI IMAN
Officer
$2.37M
@ $420.55 · 2026-06-01
BROSIUS MARK PRESTON
Officer
$15,945
@ $442.92 · 2026-05-22
BROSIUS MARK PRESTON
Officer
$23,464
@ $434.52 · 2026-05-20
LOEB GARY
Officer
$178,780
@ $446.95 · 2026-05-11
LADD AMY L
Director
$291,886
@ $471.54 · 2026-04-29
CURET MCADAMS MYRIAM J
Officer
$51,865
@ $493.95 · 2026-03-10
BROSIUS MARK PRESTON
Officer
$630,475
@ $487.61 · 2026-03-09
BROSIUS MARK PRESTON
Officer
$1.82M
@ $496.19 · 2026-03-05
WIDMAN FREDRIK
Officer
$181,915
@ $495.68 · 2026-03-03
WADORS PATRICIA L.
Officer
$109,936
@ $499.71 · 2026-02-27
WIDMAN FREDRIK
Officer
$65,830
@ $494.96 · 2026-02-11
CURET MCADAMS MYRIAM J
Officer
$65,523
@ $520.02 · 2026-01-29
CURET MCADAMS MYRIAM J
Officer
$122,500
@ $532.61 · 2026-01-27
BROSIUS MARK PRESTON
Officer
$2.72M
@ $547.47 · 2025-12-15
BROSIUS MARK PRESTON
Officer
$2.63M
@ $547.36 · 2025-12-12
CURET MCADAMS MYRIAM J
Officer
$58,230
@ $559.90 · 2025-12-10
CURET MCADAMS MYRIAM J
Officer
$71,124
@ $568.99 · 2025-12-01
GUTHART GARY S
Officer and Director
$13.02M
@ $570.89 · 2025-12-01
CHARLTON HENRY L
Officer
$7.96M
@ $580.00 · 2025-11-12
BARRATT CRAIG H
Director
$435,000
@ $580.00 · 2025-11-12
MILLER BRIAN EDWARD
Officer
$2.01M
@ $575.00 · 2025-11-10
CURET MCADAMS MYRIAM J
Officer
$58,800
@ $560.00 · 2025-11-10
WIDMAN FREDRIK
Officer
$1.14M
@ $550.00 · 2025-11-05
CURET MCADAMS MYRIAM J
Officer
$4.22M
@ $548.34 · 2025-10-29
ROSA DAVID J
Chief Executive Officer
$13.41M
@ $547.55 · 2025-10-24
BARRATT CRAIG H
Director
$1.20M
@ $548.01 · 2025-10-24
LADD AMY L
Director
$305,588
@ $455.42 · 2025-09-04
GUTHART GARY S
Officer and Director
$13.87M
@ $472.49 · 2025-08-29
CURET MCADAMS MYRIAM J
Officer
$2.22M
@ $492.48 · 2025-07-25
BROSIUS MARK PRESTON
Officer
$242,182
@ $561.91 · 2025-06-06
BROSIUS MARK PRESTON
Officer
$355,139
@ $550.60 · 2025-06-04
BROSIUS MARK PRESTON
Officer
$23,596
@ $561.81 · 2025-05-16
BROSIUS MARK PRESTON
Officer
$36,886
@ $558.88 · 2025-05-14
SAMATH JAMIE E.
Chief Financial Officer
$483,074
@ $527.95 · 2025-05-02
NACHTSHEIM JAMI DOVER K
Director
$1.25M
@ $520.00 · 2025-05-01
LADD AMY L
Director
$4.44M
@ $505.55 · 2025-04-30
DESANTIS ROBERT
Officer
$508,509
@ $513.65 · 2025-04-29
CURET MCADAMS MYRIAM J
Officer
$2.05M
@ $513.18 · 2025-04-25
LOEB GARY
Officer
$872,406
@ $513.18 · 2025-04-25
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
INTC
FearGreed
😨Fear(26/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
ISRG
FearGreed
😐Neutral(46/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
INTC
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (26)
ISRG
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (46)
View INTC Full AnalysisView ISRG Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: INTC vs ISRG

Is Intel Corporation or Intuitive Surgical, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, ISRG trades at a -66.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $259 vs. price $432), compared to INTC's -696.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $66).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intel Corporation or Intuitive Surgical, Inc.?▼

ISRG scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Intel Corporation in financial distress?▼

INTC's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ISRG scores 49.8 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Intel Corporation or Intuitive Surgical, Inc.?▼

Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) generates a 2.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Intel Corporation's 0.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

INTC vs ISRG: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io