Compare StocksINTC vs IR

Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR)

INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18
VS
IR
Ingersoll Rand Inc.
$82.16

Rewards

INTC
    IR
    • Free cash flow has grown at a 16.8% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $4.67 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

    Risks

    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    IR
    • Trailing P/E of 56.7x is 31% above the historical average of 43.3x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    • PEG ratio of 3.08 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • 12 insider sales totaling $56.7M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTC
    IR
    Valuation
    $-4.50B
    Free Cash Flow
    $1.08B
    -1.95%
    FCF Yield
    3.31%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    56.66
    46.59
    Forward P/E
    21.09
    Quality & Moat
    1.24%
    ROIC
    7.90%
    -0.21%
    ROE
    5.73%
    36.56%
    Gross Margin
    43.61%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    3.08
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.37
    Debt / Equity
    0.51
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.77
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.93
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    0.10%
    INTC: 2Ties: 1IR: 6
    INTCIR

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    IR

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    IR
    $4.67
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $2.10B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$9.82B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    IR
    206.8% Overvalued
    Price is 206.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $82.16
    Fair Value: $26.78
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    IR

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $82?

    +23.3%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +14.8%

    The market implies +23.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +14.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    IR
    59/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    IR
    -2.55
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,154
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    IR
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 97.0%Retail & Other 2.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,244
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    IR
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    IR
    12
    Sells (3M)
    16
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $61.34M
    REYNAL VICENTE
    Chief Executive Officer
    $11.11M
    @ $94.11 · 2026-03-02
    KINI VIKRAM
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.74M
    @ $96.50 · 2026-02-20
    HUMPHREY JOHN R.
    Director
    $412,370
    @ $95.90 · 2026-02-19
    REYNAL VICENTE
    Chief Executive Officer
    $90,000
    @ $100.00 · 2026-02-18
    SCHIESL ANDREW R
    General Counsel
    $1.76M
    @ $98.00 · 2026-02-17
    HEPDING ELIZABETH MELOY
    Officer
    $1.77M
    @ $97.11 · 2026-02-17
    REYNAL VICENTE
    Chief Executive Officer
    $9.17M
    @ $99.25 · 2026-02-17
    SCHESKE MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $1.87M
    @ $97.67 · 2026-02-17
    KEENE KATHLEEN M
    Officer
    $1.19M
    @ $99.46 · 2026-02-17
    REYNAL VICENTE
    Chief Executive Officer
    $44,000
    @ $100.00 · 2026-02-11
    REYNAL VICENTE
    Chief Executive Officer
    $9.75M
    @ $97.54 · 2026-02-04
    REYNAL VICENTE
    Chief Executive Officer
    $16.83M
    @ $88.12 · 2026-01-16
    SCHESKE MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $119,086
    @ $80.63 · 2025-12-01
    REYNAL VICENTE
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.21M
    @ $83.03 · 2025-05-20
    HEPDING ELIZABETH MELOY
    Officer
    $293,230
    @ $83.78 · 2025-05-14
    SCHIESL ANDREW R
    General Counsel
    $976,316
    @ $84.90 · 2025-05-13
    SCHIESL ANDREW R
    General Counsel
    $1.15M
    @ $87.05 · 2025-02-18
    SCHIESL ANDREW R
    General Counsel
    $2.30M
    @ $95.08 · 2024-11-05
    SCHESKE MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $246,621
    @ $97.44 · 2024-11-05
    KEENE KATHLEEN M
    Officer
    $420,673
    @ $90.00 · 2024-08-28
    HEPDING ELIZABETH MELOY
    Officer
    $685,650
    @ $91.42 · 2024-08-21
    REYNAL VICENTE
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.63M
    @ $92.51 · 2024-08-15
    SCHIESL ANDREW R
    General Counsel
    $2.16M
    @ $90.05 · 2024-08-09
    REYNAL VICENTE
    Chief Executive Officer
    $40.76M
    @ $89.20 · 2024-06-04
    SCHIESL ANDREW R
    General Counsel
    $2.06M
    @ $92.18 · 2024-05-17
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    IR
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(40/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    IR
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (40)
    View INTC Full AnalysisView IR Full Analysis
    Intel Corporation (INTC) vs Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io