SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › HON vs INTC

Honeywell International Inc. (HON) vs Intel Corporation (INTC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, HON is undervalued at $218, with a DCF intrinsic value of $550 and a margin of safety of 60%. INTC is overvalued at $66, with an intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -697%. Of the two, HON has the wider margin of safety.

HON
Honeywell International Inc.
$218.33
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$65.76

Rewards

HON
  • ★Honeywell International Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • ★Honeywell International Inc. scores 85/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
INTC
  • ★Net debt/EBITDA of -0.2x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.

Risks

HON
  • ⚠PEG ratio of 3.04 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • ⚠Insiders have sold $2.1M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
INTC
  • ⚠Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • ⚠Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 0.2% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
HON
INTC
Valuation
$7.02B
Free Cash Flow
$670.37M
10.15%
FCF Yield
0.19%
10.82
Trailing P/E
N/A
22.16
Forward P/E
35.50
Quality & Moat
12.65%
ROIC
4.06%
44.39%
ROE
-9.62%
37.21%
Gross Margin
40.15%
3.04
PEG Ratio
1.36
Balance Sheet Safety
0.49
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.23
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.20
1.28%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
HON: 6Ties: 1INTC: 4
HONINTC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
HON

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

INTC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
HON
$-0.78
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$7.36B
Δ Market Cap
$-5.72B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
INTC
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-22.02B
Δ Market Cap
+$74.94B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
HON
60.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 60.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $218.33
Fair Value: $550.49
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
INTC
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $65.76
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
HON

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $218?

+4.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +0.0%

The market implies +4.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +0.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

INTC

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $66?

+54.7%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
HON
85/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
INTC
17/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
HON
-2.60
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
INTC
-2.83
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
HON
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 84.6%Retail & Other 15.3%
No. of Institutional Holders2,821
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
INTC
Insiders 13.9%Institutions 62.8%Retail & Other 23.3%
No. of Institutional Holders4,439
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
HON
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
INTC
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.25M
TAN LIP-BU
Chief Executive Officer
$10.00M
@ $95.00 · 2026-08-11
ZINSNER DAVID A
Chief Financial Officer
$249,985
@ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
GELSINGER PATRICK P
Chief Executive Officer
$251,198
@ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
HON
2
Sells (3M)
10
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $12.74M
KAPUR VIMAL M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.43M
@ $220.99 · 2026-10-26
LU SU PING
General Counsel
$650,934
@ $221.18 · 2026-10-26
WEST KENNETH J
Officer
$77,569
@ $245.47 · 2026-08-03
WEST KENNETH J
Officer
$4.15M
@ $243.77 · 2026-07-27
CURRIER JAMES E
Officer
$547,725
@ $243.65 · 2026-03-02
WEST KENNETH J
Officer
$211,877
@ $242.70 · 2026-03-02
LIEBLEIN GRACE D
Director
$1.43M
@ $243.73 · 2026-02-23
DAVIS D. SCOTT
Director
$568,080
@ $240.00 · 2026-02-19
MAILLOUX ROBERT D
Officer
$1.26M
@ $239.00 · 2026-02-06
MAILLOUX ROBERT D
Officer
$2.42M
@ $229.00 · 2026-01-30
BOLDEA LUCIAN
Officer
$9.34M
@ $221.58 · 2025-08-27
WEST KENNETH J
Officer
$752,026
@ $218.10 · 2025-08-01
MADDEN ANNE T
General Counsel
$6.00M
@ $207.89 · 2025-02-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
INTC
0
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.47M
CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
Chief Technology Officer
$2.49M
@ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$4.01M
@ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$981,000
@ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
General Counsel
$650,000
@ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
HON
FearGreed
😐Neutral(55/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
INTC
FearGreed
😨Fear(26/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
HON
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (55)
INTC
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (26)
View HON Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: HON vs INTC

Is Honeywell International Inc. or Intel Corporation more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, HON trades at a 60.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $550 vs. price $218), compared to INTC's -696.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $66).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Honeywell International Inc. or Intel Corporation?▼

HON scores 85/100 (Wide moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Intel Corporation in financial distress?▼

INTC's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. HON scores 2.5 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Honeywell International Inc. or Intel Corporation?▼

Honeywell International Inc. (HON) generates a 10.1% free cash flow yield, compared to Intel Corporation's 0.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Honeywell International Inc. or Intel Corporation?▼

HON earns 12.6% ROIC versus INTC's 4.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.