Compare StocksIBKR vs QCOM

Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, IBKR is overvalued at $88, with a DCF intrinsic value of $73 and a margin of safety of -21%. QCOM is overvalued at $191, with an intrinsic value of $125 and a margin of safety of -52%. Of the two, IBKR has the wider margin of safety.

IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
$88.24
VS
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$190.91

Rewards

IBKR
  • Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 93.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. scores 81/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
QCOM
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 23.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

IBKR
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • Trailing P/E of 35.0x is 60% above the historical average of 21.9x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.43 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
QCOM
  • FCF yield of 5.0% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
IBKR
QCOM
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$10.24B
N/A
FCF Yield
5.02%
35.02
Trailing P/E
21.84
27.69
Forward P/E
18.71
Quality & Moat
6.07%
ROIC
15.03%
24.02%
ROE
33.75%
93.04%
Gross Margin
54.23%
1.47
PEG Ratio
0.82
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
0.25
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.58
0.40%
Dividend Yield
1.99%
IBKR: 2Ties: 1QCOM: 6
IBKRQCOM

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
IBKR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

QCOM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
IBKR
$10.24
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.07B
Δ Market Cap
+$21.20B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
QCOM
$5.06
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$11.96B
Δ Market Cap
+$60.46B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
IBKR
21.4% Overvalued
Price is 21.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $88.24
Fair Value: $72.71
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
QCOM
142.3% Overvalued
Price is 142.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $190.91
Fair Value: $78.78
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
IBKR

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

QCOM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $191?

+15.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.1%

The market implies +15.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
IBKR
81/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
QCOM
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
IBKR
-2.34
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
QCOM
-3.16
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
IBKR
Insiders 2.7%Institutions 88.5%Retail & Other 8.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,504
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
QCOM
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 83.0%Retail & Other 16.8%
No. of Institutional Holders3,923
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
IBKR
3
Buys (3M)
8
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $44,364
CONKLING LORI A
Director
$2,363
@ $94.52 · 2026-09-01
CONKLING LORI A
Director
$2,176
@ $87.04 · 2026-08-03
CONKLING LORI A
Director
$2,201
@ $88.04 · 2026-07-01
CONKLING LORI A
Director
$2,152
@ $86.08 · 2026-06-01
CONKLING LORI A
Director
$1,991
@ $79.64 · 2026-05-01
CONKLING LORI A
Director
$1,710
@ $68.40 · 2026-04-01
CONKLING LORI A
Director
$5,391
@ $71.88 · 2026-03-02
BRIGHT JILL
Director
$26,380
@ $65.95 · 2025-10-23
BRIGHT JILL
Director
$29,634
@ $219.51 · 2025-01-31
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
QCOM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
IBKR
0
Sells (3M)
4
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $5.77M
HARRIS LAWRENCE E
Director
$2.00M
@ $76.93 · 2026-04-28
HARRIS LAWRENCE E
Director
$734,505
@ $69.00 · 2025-10-29
HARRIS LAWRENCE E
Director
$996,998
@ $69.45 · 2025-10-28
HARRIS LAWRENCE E
Director
$2.04M
@ $67.86 · 2025-10-24
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
QCOM
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
IBKR
FearGreed
😐Neutral(51/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
QCOM
FearGreed
😐Neutral(54/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
IBKR
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (51)
QCOM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (54)
View IBKR Full AnalysisView QCOM Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: IBKR vs QCOM

Is Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. or QUALCOMM Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, IBKR trades at a -21.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $73 vs. price $88), compared to QCOM's -52.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $125 vs. $191).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. or QUALCOMM Incorporated?

IBKR scores 81/100 (Wide moat), while QCOM scores 73/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. in financial distress?

IBKR's Altman Z-Score of 0.4 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. QCOM scores 6.5 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. or QUALCOMM Incorporated?

QCOM earns 15.0% ROIC versus IBKR's 6.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.'s or QUALCOMM Incorporated's?

IBKR's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to QCOM's 84/100 (Very Safe). IBKR has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

IBKR vs QCOM: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io