Compare Stocks › HWM vs JNJ

Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) vs Johnson & Johnson (JNJ): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, HWM is overvalued at $199, with a DCF intrinsic value of $164 and a margin of safety of -22%. JNJ is overvalued at $273, with an intrinsic value of $203 and a margin of safety of -35%. Of the two, HWM has the wider margin of safety.

HWM
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
$199.22
VS
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
$273.20

Rewards

HWM
  • ★Howmet Aerospace Inc. scores 83/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 38.4% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.51 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
JNJ
  • ★Johnson & Johnson has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 67.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Johnson & Johnson scores 90/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

HWM
  • ⚠FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
JNJ
  • ⚠FCF yield of 2.8% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 41.5x is 108% above the historical average of 20.0x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • ⚠PEG ratio of 3.07 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
HWM
JNJ
Valuation
$1.29B
Free Cash Flow
$18.50B
1.63%
FCF Yield
2.81%
39.06
Trailing P/E
41.46
30.11
Forward P/E
23.52
Quality & Moat
21.31%
ROIC
16.01%
37.65%
ROE
20.02%
36.63%
Gross Margin
67.77%
0.80
PEG Ratio
3.07
Balance Sheet Safety
0.71
Net Debt / Equity
0.34
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.35
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.79
0.28%
Dividend Yield
1.96%
HWM: 4Ties: 1JNJ: 7
HWMJNJ

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
HWM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

JNJ

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
HWM
$21.57
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$3.06B
Δ Market Cap
+$66.10B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
JNJ
$0.91
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Mediocre Allocator
Σ Retained
$40.05B
Δ Market Cap
+$36.63B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
HWM
21.6% Overvalued
Price is 21.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $199.22
Fair Value: $163.87
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
JNJ
34.7% Overvalued
Price is 34.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $273.20
Fair Value: $202.84
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
HWM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $199?

+21.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +23.8%

The market implies +21.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +23.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

JNJ

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $273?

+9.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +16.1%

The market implies +9.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +16.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
HWM
83/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
JNJ
90/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
HWM
-2.54
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
JNJ
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
HWM
Insiders 0.9%Institutions 93.8%Retail & Other 5.3%
No. of Institutional Holders2,140
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
JNJ
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 76.8%Retail & Other 23.2%
No. of Institutional Holders5,842
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
HWM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
JNJ
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $257,688
MORIKIS JOHN G
Director
$257,688
@ $206.15 · 2025-11-26
WEINBERGER MARK A
Director
$147,220
@ $147.22 · 2024-12-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
HWM
0
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $22.92M
MARCHUK NEIL EDWARD
Officer
$11.30M
@ $269.50 · 2026-05-11
SHULTZ BARBARA LOU
Officer
$260,005
@ $260.00 · 2026-02-26
MARCHUK NEIL EDWARD
Officer
$11.36M
@ $251.70 · 2026-02-18
LIN LOLA FELICE
Officer
$2.37M
@ $180.51 · 2025-08-05
MARCHUK NEIL EDWARD
Officer
$4.76M
@ $158.53 · 2025-05-12
SHULTZ BARBARA LOU
Officer
$193,962
@ $155.17 · 2025-05-05
LIN LOLA FELICE
Officer
$902,886
@ $136.39 · 2025-02-18
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
JNJ
5
Sells (3M)
14
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $128.54M
SCHMID TIMOTHY
Officer
$9.23M
@ $274.74 · 2026-09-02
TAUBERT JENNIFER L
Officer
$3.95M
@ $263.36 · 2026-08-17
DUATO JOAQUIN BOIX
Chief Executive Officer
$32.20M
@ $261.17 · 2026-08-13
FORMINARD ELIZABETH
Officer
$4.09M
@ $257.00 · 2026-08-06
DUATO JOAQUIN BOIX
Chief Executive Officer
$12.52M
@ $258.15 · 2026-08-05
BROADHURST VANESSA
Officer
$5.79M
@ $251.27 · 2026-07-20
WENGEL KATHRYN E
Chief Technology Officer
$2.41M
@ $241.15 · 2026-06-11
DECKER ROBERT J
Officer
$1.01M
@ $247.87 · 2026-02-27
SCHMID TIMOTHY
Officer
$324,763
@ $245.66 · 2026-02-20
SCHMID TIMOTHY
Officer
$5.53M
@ $244.33 · 2026-02-18
BROADHURST VANESSA
Officer
$1.51M
@ $243.39 · 2026-02-17
SWANSON JAMES D
Chief Technology Officer
$15.11M
@ $243.39 · 2026-02-17
WOLK JOSEPH J
Chief Financial Officer
$21.77M
@ $242.80 · 2026-02-17
REED JOHN C
Officer
$13.11M
@ $243.00 · 2026-02-17
REED JOHN C
Officer
$4.19M
@ $192.71 · 2025-10-17
TAUBERT JENNIFER L
Officer
$10.04M
@ $177.81 · 2025-09-04
DUATO JOAQUIN BOIX
Chief Executive Officer
$22.55M
@ $179.21 · 2025-08-22
WOLK JOSEPH J
Chief Financial Officer
$2.98M
@ $176.91 · 2025-08-15
REED JOHN C
Officer
$3.13M
@ $163.55 · 2025-07-17
DECKER ROBERT J
Officer
$1.16M
@ $165.88 · 2025-02-25
SCHMID TIMOTHY
Officer
$62,928
@ $156.15 · 2025-02-18
WOLK JOSEPH J
Chief Financial Officer
$2.00M
@ $153.89 · 2025-02-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
HWM
FearGreed
😨Fear(32/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
JNJ
FearGreed
😏Greed(67/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
HWM
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (32)
JNJ
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (67)
View HWM Full AnalysisView JNJ Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: HWM vs JNJ

Is Howmet Aerospace Inc. or Johnson & Johnson more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, HWM trades at a -21.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $164 vs. price $199), compared to JNJ's -34.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $203 vs. $273).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Howmet Aerospace Inc. or Johnson & Johnson?▼

JNJ scores 90/100 (Wide moat), while HWM scores 83/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Howmet Aerospace Inc. or Johnson & Johnson?▼

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) generates a 2.8% free cash flow yield, compared to Howmet Aerospace Inc.'s 1.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Howmet Aerospace Inc. or Johnson & Johnson?▼

HWM earns 21.3% ROIC versus JNJ's 16.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Howmet Aerospace Inc.'s or Johnson & Johnson's?▼

HWM's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to JNJ's 79/100 (Safe). HWM has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

HWM vs JNJ: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io