Compare StocksHST vs JNJ

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (HST) vs Johnson & Johnson (JNJ): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, HST is undervalued at $25, with a DCF intrinsic value of $10081055985 and a margin of safety of 100%. JNJ is fairly valued at $256, with an intrinsic value of $283 and a margin of safety of 9%. Of the two, HST has the wider margin of safety.

HST
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
$25.13
VS
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
$256.35

Rewards

HST
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $4.63 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
JNJ
  • Johnson & Johnson has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 68.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Johnson & Johnson scores 90/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

HST
  • PEG ratio of 4.14 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.58 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
JNJ
  • FCF yield of 2.7% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 29.8x is 49% above the historical average of 20.0x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 4.23 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
HST
JNJ
Valuation
$1.19B
Free Cash Flow
$16.89B
N/A
FCF Yield
2.73%
17.10
Trailing P/E
29.77
24.69
Forward P/E
20.07
Quality & Moat
7.39%
ROIC
16.85%
14.87%
ROE
25.74%
28.98%
Gross Margin
68.14%
4.14
PEG Ratio
4.23
Balance Sheet Safety
0.56
Net Debt / Equity
0.33
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.36
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.81
3.18%
Dividend Yield
2.09%
HST: 2Ties: 2JNJ: 7
HSTJNJ

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
HST

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

JNJ

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
HST
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$295.0M
Δ Market Cap
+$1.68
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
JNJ
$0.91
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Mediocre Allocator
Σ Retained
$40.05B
Δ Market Cap
+$36.63B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
HST
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $25.13
Fair Value: $10081055985.16
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
JNJ
9.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 9.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $256.35
Fair Value: $282.82
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
HST

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $25?

-14.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -19.0%

The market implies -14.5% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -19.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

JNJ

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $256?

+9.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +16.5%

The market implies +9.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +16.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
HST
62/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
JNJ
90/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
HST
-2.64
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
JNJ
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
HST
Insiders 1.5%Institutions 105.2%
No. of Institutional Holders997
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
JNJ
Insiders 0.0%Institutions 76.8%Retail & Other 23.1%
No. of Institutional Holders5,754
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
HST
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
JNJ
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $257,688
MORIKIS JOHN G
Director
$257,688
@ $206.15 · 2025-11-26
WEINBERGER MARK A
Director
$147,220
@ $147.22 · 2024-12-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
HST
3
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.98M
RAKOWICH WALTER C.
Director
$78,041
@ $22.90 · 2026-05-26
TYRRELL NATHAN S
Chief Investment Officer
$358,087
@ $23.00 · 2026-05-26
TYRRELL NATHAN S
Chief Investment Officer
$1.29M
@ $22.00 · 2026-05-08
LENTZ MICHAEL E
Officer
$252,826
@ $19.95 · 2026-02-27
TYRRELL NATHAN S
Chief Investment Officer
$384,813
@ $18.29 · 2025-12-12
LENTZ MICHAEL E
Officer
$617,474
@ $17.64 · 2025-11-25
RAKOWICH WALTER C.
Director
$71,434
@ $15.38 · 2025-05-19
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
JNJ
2
Sells (3M)
13
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $106.31M
BROADHURST VANESSA
Officer
$5.79M
@ $251.27 · 2026-07-20
WENGEL KATHRYN E
Chief Technology Officer
$2.41M
@ $241.15 · 2026-06-11
DECKER ROBERT J
Officer
$1.01M
@ $247.87 · 2026-02-27
SCHMID TIMOTHY
Officer
$324,763
@ $245.66 · 2026-02-20
SCHMID TIMOTHY
Officer
$5.53M
@ $244.33 · 2026-02-18
SWANSON JAMES D
Chief Technology Officer
$15.11M
@ $243.39 · 2026-02-17
BROADHURST VANESSA
Officer
$1.51M
@ $243.39 · 2026-02-17
WOLK JOSEPH J
Chief Financial Officer
$21.77M
@ $242.80 · 2026-02-17
REED JOHN C
Officer
$13.11M
@ $243.00 · 2026-02-17
REED JOHN C
Officer
$4.19M
@ $192.71 · 2025-10-17
TAUBERT JENNIFER L
Officer
$10.04M
@ $177.81 · 2025-09-04
DUATO JOAQUIN BOIX
Chief Executive Officer
$22.55M
@ $179.21 · 2025-08-22
WOLK JOSEPH J
Chief Financial Officer
$2.98M
@ $176.91 · 2025-08-15
REED JOHN C
Officer
$3.13M
@ $163.55 · 2025-07-17
DECKER ROBERT J
Officer
$1.16M
@ $165.88 · 2025-02-25
SCHMID TIMOTHY
Officer
$62,928
@ $156.15 · 2025-02-18
WOLK JOSEPH J
Chief Financial Officer
$2.00M
@ $153.89 · 2025-02-07
DECKER ROBERT J
Officer
$930,113
@ $165.06 · 2024-08-30
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
HST
FearGreed
😏Greed(67/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
JNJ
FearGreed
😏Greed(61/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
HST
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (67)
JNJ
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
View HST Full AnalysisView JNJ Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: HST vs JNJ

Is Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. or Johnson & Johnson more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, HST trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $10081055985 vs. price $25), compared to JNJ's 9.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $283 vs. $256).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. or Johnson & Johnson?

JNJ scores 90/100 (Wide moat), while HST scores 62/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. in financial distress?

HST's Altman Z-Score of 0.6 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. JNJ scores 3.5 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. or Johnson & Johnson?

JNJ earns 16.9% ROIC versus HST's 7.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.'s or Johnson & Johnson's?

JNJ's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to HST's 40/100 (Borderline). JNJ has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.