Compare StocksHSIC vs QCOM

Henry Schein, Inc. (HSIC) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, HSIC is fairly valued at $85, with a DCF intrinsic value of $85 and a margin of safety of -1%. QCOM is overvalued at $189, with an intrinsic value of $125 and a margin of safety of -51%. Of the two, HSIC has the wider margin of safety.

HSIC
Henry Schein, Inc.
$85.42
VS
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$189.09

Rewards

HSIC
  • Share count has been reduced by 12% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
QCOM
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 23.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

HSIC
    QCOM
    • FCF yield of 5.1% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    • 14 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    HSIC
    QCOM
    Valuation
    $446.00M
    Free Cash Flow
    $10.24B
    4.68%
    FCF Yield
    5.07%
    24.91
    Trailing P/E
    21.64
    14.24
    Forward P/E
    18.53
    Quality & Moat
    7.24%
    ROIC
    15.03%
    8.85%
    ROE
    33.75%
    31.32%
    Gross Margin
    54.23%
    1.77
    PEG Ratio
    0.82
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.77
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.25
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    3.39
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.58
    0.00%
    Dividend Yield
    1.99%
    HSIC: 1Ties: 1QCOM: 10
    HSICQCOM

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    HSIC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    QCOM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    HSIC
    $-1.48
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $1.20B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-1.78B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    QCOM
    $5.06
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $11.96B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$60.46B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    HSIC
    0.7% Overvalued
    Price is 0.7% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $85.42
    Fair Value: $84.85
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    QCOM
    140.0% Overvalued
    Price is 140.0% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $189.09
    Fair Value: $78.78
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    HSIC

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $85?

    +11.8%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +13.0%

    The market implies +11.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +13.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    QCOM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $189?

    +15.3%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +8.0%

    The market implies +15.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    HSIC
    57/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    QCOM
    73/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    HSIC
    -2.53
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    QCOM
    -3.16
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    HSIC
    Insiders 0.8%Institutions 112.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders788
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    QCOM
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 83.0%Retail & Other 16.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,923
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    HSIC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $691,900
    DANIEL WILLIAM K
    Director
    $691,900
    @ $69.19 · 2026-05-11
    DANIEL WILLIAM K
    Director
    $670,800
    @ $67.08 · 2025-08-07
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    QCOM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    HSIC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    4
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.03M
    POPECK THOMAS C
    Officer
    $98,630
    @ $72.79 · 2026-03-19
    KUEHN KURT P
    Director
    $224,565
    @ $78.96 · 2026-03-10
    LASKAWY PHILIP A
    Director
    $228,544
    @ $80.36 · 2026-03-05
    MLOTEK MARK E
    Officer
    $478,740
    @ $80.80 · 2026-03-04
    CONNETT BRADFORD C
    Officer
    $287,161
    @ $71.15 · 2025-03-19
    LASKAWY PHILIP A
    Director
    $184,999
    @ $71.04 · 2025-03-19
    KUEHN KURT P
    Director
    $199,396
    @ $71.55 · 2025-03-05
    ETTINGER MICHAEL S.
    Chief Operating Officer
    $918,000
    @ $75.00 · 2024-11-18
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    QCOM
    3
    Sells (3M)
    14
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $12.29M
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $457,129
    @ $182.85 · 2026-09-11
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $408,143
    @ $163.26 · 2026-08-12
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $452,030
    @ $180.81 · 2026-07-14
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $493,380
    @ $197.35 · 2026-06-11
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $529,741
    @ $211.90 · 2026-05-12
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $325,854
    @ $130.34 · 2026-04-13
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $330,815
    @ $132.33 · 2026-03-12
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $458,799
    @ $137.65 · 2026-02-06
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $577,620
    @ $173.30 · 2026-01-02
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $2.20M
    @ $175.29 · 2025-12-19
    CHAPLIN ANN C
    General Counsel
    $1.28M
    @ $178.03 · 2025-12-16
    ROGERS ALEXANDER H
    Officer
    $2.83M
    @ $178.01 · 2025-12-16
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $567,702
    @ $170.33 · 2025-11-07
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.38M
    @ $166.06 · 2025-10-20
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $522,808
    @ $156.86 · 2025-09-02
    MARTIN NEIL A
    Officer
    $122,463
    @ $154.82 · 2025-08-21
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $493,610
    @ $148.10 · 2025-08-04
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $537,560
    @ $161.28 · 2025-07-02
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $486,965
    @ $146.10 · 2025-06-02
    MARTIN NEIL A
    Officer
    $120,808
    @ $153.70 · 2025-05-21
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $465,846
    @ $139.77 · 2025-05-05
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $91,442
    @ $141.11 · 2025-04-09
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $119,900
    @ $132.63 · 2025-04-08
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $235,262
    @ $132.10 · 2025-04-04
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $523,292
    @ $156.82 · 2025-03-03
    MARTIN NEIL A
    Officer
    $130,074
    @ $174.83 · 2025-02-21
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $509,397
    @ $169.80 · 2025-02-12
    ROGERS ALEXANDER H
    Officer
    $3.28M
    @ $169.83 · 2025-02-10
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $463,851
    @ $154.62 · 2025-01-02
    CHAPLIN ANN C
    General Counsel
    $409,056
    @ $158.12 · 2024-12-16
    CHAPLIN ANN C
    General Counsel
    $1.24M
    @ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
    ROGERS ALEXANDER H
    Officer
    $1.67M
    @ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $484,617
    @ $161.54 · 2024-12-05
    MARTIN NEIL A
    Officer
    $202,120
    @ $155.00 · 2024-11-21
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    HSIC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(52/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    QCOM
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    HSIC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
    QCOM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    View HSIC Full AnalysisView QCOM Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: HSIC vs QCOM

    Is Henry Schein, Inc. or QUALCOMM Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, HSIC trades at a -0.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $85 vs. price $85), compared to QCOM's -50.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $125 vs. $189).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Henry Schein, Inc. or QUALCOMM Incorporated?

    QCOM scores 73/100 (Wide moat), while HSIC scores 57/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Henry Schein, Inc. in financial distress?

    HSIC's Altman Z-Score of 2.8 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. QCOM scores 6.5 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Henry Schein, Inc. or QUALCOMM Incorporated?

    QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) generates a 5.1% free cash flow yield, compared to Henry Schein, Inc.'s 4.7%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Henry Schein, Inc. or QUALCOMM Incorporated?

    QCOM earns 15.0% ROIC versus HSIC's 7.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.