Compare StocksHPQ vs INTC

HP Inc. (HPQ) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

HPQ
HP Inc.
$20.83
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$99.61

Rewards

HPQ
  • HP Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • HP Inc. scores 74/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • FCF yield of 14.8% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
INTC

    Risks

    HPQ
    • Gross margin of 20.3% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Altman Z-Score of 1.64 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    • Free cash flow has declined at a 8.9% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    HPQ
    INTC
    Valuation
    $2.83B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-8.30B
    14.78%
    FCF Yield
    -1.66%
    7.89
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    7.00
    Forward P/E
    66.78
    Quality & Moat
    25.12%
    ROIC
    1.72%
    N/A
    ROE
    -0.21%
    20.25%
    Gross Margin
    37.20%
    1.80
    PEG Ratio
    1.36
    Balance Sheet Safety
    N/A
    Debt / Equity
    0.36
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    1.75
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.86
    5.76%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    HPQ: 4Ties: 1INTC: 3
    HPQINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    HPQ

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    HPQ
    $-1.08
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $5.37B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-5.81B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    HPQ
    42.6% Margin of Safety
    Price is 42.6% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $20.83
    Fair Value: $36.27
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $99.61
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    HPQ

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $21?

    -1.0%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -2.6%

    The market implies -1.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding -2.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    HPQ
    74/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    HPQ
    -2.48
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    HPQ
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 91.0%Retail & Other 8.7%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,494
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,201
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    HPQ
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    HPQ
    1
    Sells (3M)
    6
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $4.54M
    CITRINO MARY ANNE
    Director
    $834,327
    @ $18.47 · 2026-03-11
    PATEL KETAN MAGANLAL
    Officer
    $772,714
    @ $23.19 · 2025-12-26
    OLSON ANNELIESE
    Officer
    $415,307
    @ $24.83 · 2025-12-09
    LORES ENRIQUE J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.09M
    @ $26.01 · 2025-12-05
    OLSON ANNELIESE
    Officer
    $506,134
    @ $27.88 · 2025-10-29
    LORES ENRIQUE J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $920,472
    @ $26.85 · 2025-09-29
    OLSON ANNELIESE
    Officer
    $613,817
    @ $28.49 · 2025-03-27
    LIEBMAN STEPHANIE
    Officer
    $453,734
    @ $29.00 · 2025-03-24
    LORES ENRIQUE J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.71M
    @ $31.08 · 2025-03-03
    LIEBMAN STEPHANIE
    Officer
    $357,500
    @ $32.50 · 2024-12-30
    LUDGATE KRISTEN MARIE
    Officer
    $2.56M
    @ $34.43 · 2024-12-13
    CHO ALEX
    Officer
    $1.40M
    @ $34.80 · 2024-12-11
    LORES ENRIQUE J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.00M
    @ $36.45 · 2024-12-09
    CHO ALEX
    Officer
    $353,427
    @ $34.32 · 2024-11-29
    LORES ENRIQUE J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $7.01M
    @ $33.16 · 2024-09-12
    CHO ALEX
    Officer
    $6.25M
    @ $36.11 · 2024-06-21
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    HPQ
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(38/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(74/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    HPQ
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (38)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
    View HPQ Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis
    HPQ vs INTC: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io