Compare StocksHPE vs MSFT

Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (HPE) vs Microsoft Corporation (MSFT)

HPE
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
$28.57
VS
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
$414.19

Rewards

HPE
  • PEG ratio of 0.85 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
MSFT
  • Microsoft Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 68.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Microsoft Corporation scores 88/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

HPE
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • FCF yield of 6.7% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.85 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
MSFT
  • FCF yield of 2.3% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
HPE
MSFT
Valuation
$2.55B
Free Cash Flow
$71.61B
6.73%
FCF Yield
2.33%
N/A
Trailing P/E
24.68
10.51
Forward P/E
21.46
Quality & Moat
4.64%
ROIC
21.58%
-0.24%
ROE
24.58%
32.07%
Gross Margin
68.31%
0.85
PEG Ratio
1.05
Balance Sheet Safety
0.87
Debt / Equity
0.30
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
3.44
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.26
2.00%
Dividend Yield
0.88%
HPE: 4Ties: 1MSFT: 6
HPEMSFT

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
HPE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

MSFT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
HPE
$4.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.57B
Δ Market Cap
+$11.22B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MSFT
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$196.68B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.81T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
HPE
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $28.57
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MSFT
3.0% Overvalued
Price is 3.0% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $414.19
Fair Value: $402.01
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
HPE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $29?

+60.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.7%

The market implies +60.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

MSFT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $414?

+13.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +18.3%

The market implies +13.5% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +18.3%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
HPE
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
MSFT
88/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
HPE
-2.10
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MSFT
-2.51
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
HPE
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 94.2%Retail & Other 5.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,533
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MSFT
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 75.9%Retail & Other 24.0%
No. of Institutional Holders8,016
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
HPE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MSFT
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.99M
STANTON JOHN W.
Director
$1.99M
@ $397.35 · 2026-02-18
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$1.45M
@ $377.47 · 2025-04-23
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
HPE
6
Sells (3M)
24
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $44.57M
RUSSO FIDELMA
Chief Technology Officer
$475,518
@ $27.97 · 2026-04-21
MACDONALD NEIL B
Officer
$654,976
@ $27.01 · 2026-04-20
NERI ANTONIO F
Chief Executive Officer
$3.97M
@ $26.50 · 2026-04-17
RUSSO FIDELMA
Chief Technology Officer
$852,746
@ $25.08 · 2026-03-25
MACDONALD NEIL B
Officer
$2.83M
@ $25.09 · 2026-03-25
NERI ANTONIO F
Chief Executive Officer
$6.66M
@ $25.18 · 2026-03-25
NERI ANTONIO F
Chief Executive Officer
$647,853
@ $24.49 · 2025-12-29
KARROS KIRT P
Officer and Treasurer
$897,168
@ $24.61 · 2025-12-24
CULLOTY MAEVE C
Officer
$886,562
@ $24.66 · 2025-12-11
RUSSO FIDELMA
Chief Technology Officer
$3.11M
@ $24.61 · 2025-12-11
COX JEREMY K.
Chief Technology Officer
$332,330
@ $24.68 · 2025-12-11
COX JEREMY K.
Chief Technology Officer
$1.52M
@ $23.92 · 2025-12-10
SCHULTZ JOHN F. J.D.
Chief Operating Officer
$4.21M
@ $24.83 · 2025-12-10
HOBBY JEAN M
Director
$689,968
@ $23.79 · 2025-12-08
SCHULTZ JOHN F. J.D.
Officer
$1.96M
@ $23.15 · 2025-12-08
CULLOTY MAEVE C
Officer
$93,899
@ $25.12 · 2025-09-23
NERI ANTONIO F
Chief Executive Officer
$4.17M
@ $25.03 · 2025-09-12
NERI ANTONIO F
Chief Executive Officer
$2.00M
@ $24.04 · 2025-09-04
NERI ANTONIO F
Chief Executive Officer
$1.92M
@ $23.01 · 2025-08-28
NERI ANTONIO F
Chief Executive Officer
$3.75M
@ $22.52 · 2025-08-22
MOTTRAM PHIL
Officer
$616,173
@ $20.54 · 2025-06-30
COX JEREMY K.
Chief Technology Officer
$1.26M
@ $18.44 · 2025-06-27
MOTTRAM PHIL
Officer
$555,000
@ $18.50 · 2025-06-25
MACDONALD NEIL B
Officer
$493,365
@ $17.01 · 2025-05-08
MAYER BETHANY J
Director
$84,535
@ $13.19 · 2025-04-04
COX JEREMY K.
Officer
$266,271
@ $23.00 · 2025-01-06
RUSSO FIDELMA
Chief Technology Officer
$1.13M
@ $21.86 · 2024-12-12
MACDONALD NEIL B
Officer
$388,817
@ $21.78 · 2024-12-12
GOLD GERRI
Officer
$59,547
@ $21.78 · 2024-12-12
MAJOR KRISTIN K
Officer
$154,986
@ $21.78 · 2024-12-12
COX JEREMY K.
Officer
$109,227
@ $21.78 · 2024-12-12
KARROS KIRT P
Officer and Treasurer
$194,604
@ $21.78 · 2024-12-12
RUSSO FIDELMA
Chief Technology Officer
$2.08M
@ $22.11 · 2024-12-11
MACDONALD NEIL B
Officer
$3.12M
@ $22.37 · 2024-12-11
GOLD GERRI
Chief Executive Officer
$371,590
@ $21.83 · 2024-12-11
MAJOR KRISTIN K
Officer
$934,445
@ $22.54 · 2024-12-11
COX JEREMY K.
Officer
$143,205
@ $21.83 · 2024-12-11
SCHULTZ JOHN F. J.D.
Officer
$5.68M
@ $21.62 · 2024-12-11
KARROS KIRT P
Officer and Treasurer
$1.01M
@ $21.83 · 2024-12-11
MOTTRAM PHIL
Officer
$1.48M
@ $22.69 · 2024-12-10
COX JEREMY K.
Chief Technology Officer
$178,733
@ $23.00 · 2024-12-06
NERI ANTONIO F
Chief Executive Officer
$5.18M
@ $20.73 · 2024-10-14
COX JEREMY K.
Chief Technology Officer
$163,170
@ $21.00 · 2024-10-08
RUSSO FIDELMA
Chief Technology Officer
$1.12M
@ $19.99 · 2024-10-02
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MSFT
1
Sells (3M)
13
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $172.43M
HOGAN KATHLEEN T
Officer
$5.05M
@ $409.55 · 2026-03-06
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.36M
@ $478.72 · 2025-12-04
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$6.27M
@ $491.52 · 2025-12-02
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$19.97M
@ $518.64 · 2025-11-03
NADELLA SATYA
Chief Executive Officer
$75.32M
@ $504.78 · 2025-09-03
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$2.56M
@ $527.32 · 2025-08-12
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.39M
@ $463.00 · 2025-06-03
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$460,008
@ $460.01 · 2025-05-30
HOGAN KATHLEEN T
Officer
$9.76M
@ $453.77 · 2025-05-21
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$7.33M
@ $458.18 · 2025-05-19
COLEMAN AMY
Officer
$5.99M
@ $452.04 · 2025-05-15
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$1.68M
@ $438.44 · 2025-05-05
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$35.30M
@ $435.84 · 2025-05-05
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.12M
@ $447.41 · 2024-12-09
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$874,634
@ $437.32 · 2024-12-04
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.50M
@ $428.76 · 2024-12-02
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$10.43M
@ $417.00 · 2024-11-22
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$414,720
@ $414.72 · 2024-11-22
YOUNG CHRISTOPHER DAVID
Officer
$3.05M
@ $423.66 · 2024-11-12
HOGAN KATHLEEN T
Officer
$7.16M
@ $411.86 · 2024-09-10
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.03M
@ $411.04 · 2024-09-10
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$16.10M
@ $402.59 · 2024-09-09
HOOD AMY E
Chief Financial Officer
$15.60M
@ $410.55 · 2024-09-05
NADELLA SATYA
Chief Executive Officer
$32.02M
@ $408.63 · 2024-09-04
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$235,535
@ $416.14 · 2024-06-03
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$10.64M
@ $425.68 · 2024-05-23
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
HPE
FearGreed
😏Greed(65/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MSFT
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
HPE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
MSFT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
View HPE Full AnalysisView MSFT Full Analysis