Compare StocksHPE vs MA

Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (HPE) vs Mastercard Incorporated (MA): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, HPE is overvalued at $57, with a DCF intrinsic value of $6 and a margin of safety of -826%. MA is fairly valued at $568, with an intrinsic value of $562 and a margin of safety of -1%. Of the two, MA has the wider margin of safety.

HPE
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
$56.68
VS
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
$567.75

Rewards

HPE
  • PEG ratio of 0.44 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
MA
  • Mastercard Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 100.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Mastercard Incorporated scores 99/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

HPE
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • FCF yield of 6.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • Trailing P/E of 28.8x is 89% above the historical average of 15.2x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
MA
  • High leverage (2.33x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • 13 insider sales totaling $62.1M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
HPE
MA
Valuation
$4.74B
Free Cash Flow
$16.96B
6.30%
FCF Yield
3.41%
28.77
Trailing P/E
31.54
12.33
Forward P/E
24.66
Quality & Moat
8.86%
ROIC
55.99%
10.94%
ROE
241.20%
36.62%
Gross Margin
100.00%
0.44
PEG Ratio
1.50
Balance Sheet Safety
0.53
Net Debt / Equity
2.33
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.05
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.59
1.01%
Dividend Yield
0.61%
HPE: 6Ties: 1MA: 5
HPEMA

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
HPE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

MA

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
HPE
$4.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.57B
Δ Market Cap
+$11.22B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MA
$5.62
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$31.68B
Δ Market Cap
+$177.96B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
HPE
826.4% Overvalued
Price is 826.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.68
Fair Value: $6.12
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MA
1.0% Overvalued
Price is 1.0% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $567.75
Fair Value: $562.28
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
HPE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $57?

+38.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +6.9%

The market implies +38.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +6.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

MA

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $568?

+15.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +13.3%

The market implies +15.0% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +13.3%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
HPE
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
MA
99/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
HPE
-2.10
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MA
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
HPE
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 91.3%Retail & Other 8.3%
No. of Institutional Holders1,941
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MA
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 91.2%Retail & Other 8.7%
No. of Institutional Holders4,818
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
HPE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MA
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
HPE
2
Sells (3M)
20
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $34.81M
KARROS KIRT P
Officer and Treasurer
$1.11M
@ $47.02 · 2026-07-22
KARROS KIRT P
Officer and Treasurer
$911,072
@ $48.50 · 2026-06-22
MAYER BETHANY J
Director
$188,626
@ $29.10 · 2026-05-05
MYERS MARIE ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$2.81M
@ $30.01 · 2026-05-05
RUSSO FIDELMA
Chief Technology Officer
$475,518
@ $27.97 · 2026-04-21
MACDONALD NEIL B
Officer
$654,976
@ $27.01 · 2026-04-20
NERI ANTONIO F
Chief Executive Officer
$3.97M
@ $26.50 · 2026-04-17
NERI ANTONIO F
Chief Executive Officer
$6.66M
@ $25.18 · 2026-03-25
MACDONALD NEIL B
Officer
$2.83M
@ $25.09 · 2026-03-25
RUSSO FIDELMA
Chief Technology Officer
$852,746
@ $25.08 · 2026-03-25
NERI ANTONIO F
Chief Executive Officer
$647,853
@ $24.49 · 2025-12-29
KARROS KIRT P
Officer and Treasurer
$897,168
@ $24.61 · 2025-12-24
COX JEREMY K.
Chief Technology Officer
$332,330
@ $24.68 · 2025-12-11
RUSSO FIDELMA
Chief Technology Officer
$3.11M
@ $24.61 · 2025-12-11
CULLOTY MAEVE C
Officer
$886,562
@ $24.66 · 2025-12-11
SCHULTZ JOHN F. J.D.
Chief Operating Officer
$4.21M
@ $24.83 · 2025-12-10
COX JEREMY K.
Chief Technology Officer
$1.52M
@ $23.92 · 2025-12-10
SCHULTZ JOHN F. J.D.
Officer
$1.96M
@ $23.15 · 2025-12-08
HOBBY JEAN M
Director
$689,968
@ $23.79 · 2025-12-08
CULLOTY MAEVE C
Officer
$93,899
@ $25.12 · 2025-09-23
NERI ANTONIO F
Chief Executive Officer
$4.17M
@ $25.03 · 2025-09-12
NERI ANTONIO F
Chief Executive Officer
$2.00M
@ $24.04 · 2025-09-04
NERI ANTONIO F
Chief Executive Officer
$1.92M
@ $23.01 · 2025-08-28
NERI ANTONIO F
Chief Executive Officer
$3.75M
@ $22.52 · 2025-08-22
MOTTRAM PHIL
Officer
$616,173
@ $20.54 · 2025-06-30
COX JEREMY K.
Chief Technology Officer
$1.26M
@ $18.44 · 2025-06-27
MOTTRAM PHIL
Officer
$555,000
@ $18.50 · 2025-06-25
MACDONALD NEIL B
Officer
$493,365
@ $17.01 · 2025-05-08
MAYER BETHANY J
Director
$84,535
@ $13.19 · 2025-04-04
COX JEREMY K.
Officer
$266,271
@ $23.00 · 2025-01-06
COX JEREMY K.
Officer
$109,227
@ $21.78 · 2024-12-12
MACDONALD NEIL B
Officer
$388,817
@ $21.78 · 2024-12-12
RUSSO FIDELMA
Chief Technology Officer
$1.13M
@ $21.86 · 2024-12-12
KARROS KIRT P
Officer and Treasurer
$194,604
@ $21.78 · 2024-12-12
GOLD GERRI
Officer
$59,547
@ $21.78 · 2024-12-12
MAJOR KRISTIN K
Officer
$154,986
@ $21.78 · 2024-12-12
SCHULTZ JOHN F. J.D.
Officer
$5.68M
@ $21.62 · 2024-12-11
COX JEREMY K.
Officer
$143,205
@ $21.83 · 2024-12-11
RUSSO FIDELMA
Chief Technology Officer
$2.08M
@ $22.11 · 2024-12-11
MACDONALD NEIL B
Officer
$3.12M
@ $22.37 · 2024-12-11
KARROS KIRT P
Officer and Treasurer
$1.01M
@ $21.83 · 2024-12-11
GOLD GERRI
Chief Executive Officer
$371,590
@ $21.83 · 2024-12-11
MAJOR KRISTIN K
Officer
$934,445
@ $22.54 · 2024-12-11
MOTTRAM PHIL
Officer
$1.48M
@ $22.69 · 2024-12-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MA
13
Sells (3M)
14
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $66.62M
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Officer
$1.91M
@ $584.00 · 2026-09-02
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$547,837
@ $593.54 · 2026-08-31
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Officer
$4.87M
@ $576.53 · 2026-08-20
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$673,201
@ $565.24 · 2026-08-17
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Officer
$1.72M
@ $571.87 · 2026-08-05
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$8.84M
@ $575.00 · 2026-08-05
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$2.44M
@ $570.31 · 2026-08-04
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$19.08M
@ $573.84 · 2026-08-03
MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
Officer
$10.59M
@ $534.87 · 2026-07-15
ARKELL SANDRA A
Officer
$185,760
@ $540.00 · 2026-07-15
ARKELL SANDRA A
Officer
$216,000
@ $540.00 · 2026-07-07
SESHADRI RAJEEV
Officer
$3.58M
@ $526.37 · 2026-07-02
MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
Officer
$7.49M
@ $525.19 · 2026-07-01
LING HAI
Officer
$4.48M
@ $499.20 · 2026-02-24
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Chief Financial Officer
$10.20M
@ $591.00 · 2025-09-02
LING HAI
Officer
$2.69M
@ $600.00 · 2025-08-22
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Chief Financial Officer
$10.46M
@ $586.89 · 2025-08-19
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Chief Financial Officer
$3.83M
@ $566.46 · 2025-08-05
GENACHOWSKI JULIUS
Director
$178,049
@ $570.67 · 2025-07-07
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$536,480
@ $560.00 · 2025-06-30
SESHADRI RAJEEV
Officer
$601,447
@ $546.77 · 2025-06-27
GENACHOWSKI JULIUS
Director
$173,910
@ $561.00 · 2025-06-24
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$536,480
@ $560.00 · 2025-06-24
SESHADRI RAJEEV
Officer
$508,474
@ $535.80 · 2025-06-20
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$5.02M
@ $532.97 · 2025-06-20
SESHADRI RAJEEV
Officer
$1.76M
@ $561.78 · 2025-06-16
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$549,373
@ $572.86 · 2025-06-13
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$5.55M
@ $588.18 · 2025-06-12
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$8.22M
@ $585.05 · 2025-06-05
ARKELL SANDRA A
Officer
$218,223
@ $577.31 · 2025-05-15
ARKELL SANDRA A
Officer
$257,535
@ $572.30 · 2025-05-12
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$8.68M
@ $550.16 · 2025-03-26
MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
Officer
$3.81M
@ $534.68 · 2025-03-19
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$6.12M
@ $556.14 · 2025-03-05
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$9.78M
@ $553.76 · 2025-03-05
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$6.19M
@ $562.72 · 2025-02-26
MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
Officer
$6.18M
@ $564.99 · 2025-02-18
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$7.97M
@ $565.00 · 2025-02-18
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$10.17M
@ $564.95 · 2025-02-18
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.36M
@ $500.44 · 2024-11-01
MADABHUSHI VENKATA RAJAMANNAR
Officer
$2.30M
@ $491.03 · 2024-09-27
MADABHUSHI VENKATA RAJAMANNAR
Officer
$2.29M
@ $489.86 · 2024-09-20
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
HPE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(54/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MA
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
HPE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (54)
MA
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
View HPE Full AnalysisView MA Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: HPE vs MA

Is Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company or Mastercard Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, MA trades at a -1.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $562 vs. price $568), compared to HPE's -826.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $6 vs. $57).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company or Mastercard Incorporated?

MA scores 99/100 (Wide moat), while HPE scores 40/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company in financial distress?

HPE's Altman Z-Score of 0.8 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. MA scores 10.6 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company or Mastercard Incorporated?

Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (HPE) generates a 6.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Mastercard Incorporated's 3.4%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company or Mastercard Incorporated?

MA earns 56.0% ROIC versus HPE's 8.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company's or Mastercard Incorporated's?

MA's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to HPE's 21/100 (Unsafe). MA has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.