Compare StocksHOOD vs UNH

Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) vs UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH)

HOOD
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
$74.16
VS
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$280.44

Rewards

HOOD
  • Gross margin of 92.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $34.39 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
UNH
  • 5 insider purchases over the past 12 months with a buy/sell ratio above 3:1 — a sustained pattern of insider confidence.
  • Dividend yield of 3.15% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.

Risks

HOOD
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 2 out of 3 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • Beneish M-Score of -1.59 flags financial patterns consistent with potential earnings manipulation — warrants further investigation.
  • 11 insider sales totaling $66.6M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
UNH
  • ROIC has declined by 7.9 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 18.5% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • FCF yield of 5.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
HOOD
UNH
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$13.86B
N/A
FCF Yield
5.45%
36.18
Trailing P/E
21.18
26.99
Forward P/E
14.08
Quality & Moat
7.61%
ROIC
0.64%
20.58%
ROE
11.85%
92.38%
Gross Margin
18.53%
N/A
PEG Ratio
N/A
Balance Sheet Safety
1.36
Debt / Equity
0.82
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.54
N/A
Dividend Yield
3.15%
HOOD: 3Ties: 1UNH: 3
HOODUNH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
HOOD

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

UNH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
HOOD
$34.39
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.75B
Δ Market Cap
+$94.67B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
UNH
$-7.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$26.63B
Δ Market Cap
$-196.16B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
HOOD
53.7% Overvalued
Price is 53.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $74.16
Fair Value: $48.25
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
UNH
4.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 4.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $280.44
Fair Value: $294.90
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
HOOD

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

UNH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $280?

+11.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.2%

The market implies +11.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
HOOD
45/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
UNH
64/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
HOOD
-1.59
Likely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
UNH
-2.45
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
HOOD
Insiders 0.7%Institutions 74.5%Retail & Other 24.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,827
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
UNH
Insiders 0.8%Institutions 84.2%Retail & Other 14.9%
No. of Institutional Holders4,244
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
HOOD
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.97M
PAYNE CHRISTOPHER D
Director
$1.97M
@ $74.19 · 2025-06-13
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
UNH
0
Buys (3M)
5
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $31.61M
REX JOHN F
President
$5.00M
@ $291.12 · 2025-05-16
HEMSLEY STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$25.02M
@ $288.57 · 2025-05-16
GIL KRISTEN
Director
$1.00M
@ $271.17 · 2025-05-15
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$491,786
@ $320.80 · 2025-05-14
NOSEWORTHY JOHN H
Director
$93,647
@ $312.16 · 2025-05-14
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$511,575
@ $511.57 · 2025-01-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
HOOD
11
Sells (3M)
47
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $903.86M
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$469,822
@ $80.50 · 2026-03-05
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$754,903
@ $75.49 · 2026-03-03
VERMA SHIV
Chief Financial Officer
$411,274
@ $75.13 · 2026-02-17
WARNICK JASON
Former
$10.64M
@ $85.09 · 2026-02-09
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$870,665
@ $87.07 · 2026-02-03
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$4.61M
@ $87.81 · 2026-02-03
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$630,284
@ $107.48 · 2026-01-26
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$712,984
@ $121.59 · 2026-01-05
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$45.61M
@ $121.63 · 2026-01-05
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$1.22M
@ $121.58 · 2026-01-05
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$717,689
@ $122.39 · 2025-12-22
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$775,711
@ $132.26 · 2025-12-05
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$15.86M
@ $132.13 · 2025-12-03
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$6.55M
@ $131.15 · 2025-12-03
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$6.07M
@ $121.33 · 2025-11-26
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$1.13M
@ $112.98 · 2025-11-24
WARNICK JASON
Chief Financial Officer
$39.84M
@ $132.81 · 2025-11-11
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$6.80M
@ $140.61 · 2025-11-04
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$3.65M
@ $145.95 · 2025-11-03
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$861,460
@ $146.91 · 2025-10-27
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$865,118
@ $147.53 · 2025-10-06
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$3.71M
@ $148.34 · 2025-10-03
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$104.80M
@ $139.73 · 2025-10-01
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$727,872
@ $124.13 · 2025-09-22
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$403.97M
@ $114.57 · 2025-09-15
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$585,514
@ $99.83 · 2025-09-05
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$2.52M
@ $100.92 · 2025-09-03
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$6.07M
@ $100.91 · 2025-09-03
WARNICK JASON
Chief Financial Officer
$11.09M
@ $110.93 · 2025-08-15
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$4.20M
@ $104.71 · 2025-08-05
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$2.61M
@ $104.23 · 2025-08-04
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$22.49M
@ $99.97 · 2025-08-01
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$614,141
@ $104.73 · 2025-07-25
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$39.28M
@ $101.90 · 2025-07-16
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$11.64M
@ $101.65 · 2025-07-14
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$548,353
@ $93.51 · 2025-07-07
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$2.35M
@ $93.88 · 2025-07-03
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$69.95M
@ $93.27 · 2025-07-01
WARNICK JASON
Chief Financial Officer
$15.77M
@ $90.09 · 2025-06-30
WARNICK JASON
Chief Financial Officer
$29.27M
@ $83.63 · 2025-06-25
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$7.84M
@ $84.96 · 2025-06-25
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$456,362
@ $77.82 · 2025-06-20
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$431,021
@ $73.49 · 2025-06-05
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$1.79M
@ $71.64 · 2025-06-03
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$7.36M
@ $70.14 · 2025-06-03
WARNICK JASON
Chief Financial Officer
$1.65M
@ $65.95 · 2025-05-27
WARNICK JASON
Chief Financial Officer
$3.10M
@ $61.98 · 2025-05-14
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
UNH
0
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $179,645
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Chief Executive Officer
$179,645
@ $305.00 · 2025-06-10
MCSWEENEY ERIN L
Officer
$438,987
@ $626.23 · 2024-11-11
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
HOOD
FearGreed
😨Fear(37/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
UNH
FearGreed
😨Fear(37/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
HOOD
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
UNH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
View HOOD Full AnalysisView UNH Full Analysis