Compare StocksHOOD vs TSLA

Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) vs Tesla, Inc. (TSLA)

HOOD
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
$74.16
VS
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
$380.30

Rewards

HOOD
  • Gross margin of 92.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $34.39 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
TSLA
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $50.04 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Altman Z-Score of 19.94 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.8x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.

Risks

HOOD
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 2 out of 3 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • Beneish M-Score of -1.59 flags financial patterns consistent with potential earnings manipulation — warrants further investigation.
  • 11 insider sales totaling $66.6M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
TSLA
  • ROIC has declined by 17.7 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 18.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Share count has increased by 19% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
HOOD
TSLA
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$6.22B
N/A
FCF Yield
0.44%
36.18
Trailing P/E
358.77
26.99
Forward P/E
135.32
Quality & Moat
7.61%
ROIC
3.61%
20.58%
ROE
4.58%
92.38%
Gross Margin
18.03%
N/A
PEG Ratio
N/A
Balance Sheet Safety
1.36
Debt / Equity
0.18
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
-2.79
N/A
Dividend Yield
N/A
HOOD: 5Ties: 1TSLA: 1
HOODTSLA

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
HOOD

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

TSLA

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
HOOD
$34.39
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.75B
Δ Market Cap
+$94.67B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TSLA
$50.04
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$25.92B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.30T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
HOOD
53.7% Overvalued
Price is 53.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $74.16
Fair Value: $48.25
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TSLA
367.6% Overvalued
Price is 367.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $380.30
Fair Value: $81.33
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
HOOD

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

TSLA

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $380?

+49.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +41.8%

The market implies +49.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +41.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
HOOD
45/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TSLA
31/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
HOOD
-1.59
Likely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TSLA
-2.86
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
HOOD
Insiders 0.7%Institutions 74.5%Retail & Other 24.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,827
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TSLA
Insiders 11.1%Institutions 44.6%Retail & Other 44.3%
No. of Institutional Holders5,299
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
HOOD
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.97M
PAYNE CHRISTOPHER D
Director
$1.97M
@ $74.19 · 2025-06-13
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TSLA
0
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.00B
MUSK ELON REEVE
Chief Executive Officer
$999.96M
@ $389.28 · 2025-09-12
GEBBIA JOSEPH
Director
$1.03M
@ $256.31 · 2025-04-24
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
HOOD
11
Sells (3M)
47
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $903.86M
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$469,822
@ $80.50 · 2026-03-05
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$754,903
@ $75.49 · 2026-03-03
VERMA SHIV
Chief Financial Officer
$411,274
@ $75.13 · 2026-02-17
WARNICK JASON
Former
$10.64M
@ $85.09 · 2026-02-09
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$870,665
@ $87.07 · 2026-02-03
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$4.61M
@ $87.81 · 2026-02-03
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$630,284
@ $107.48 · 2026-01-26
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$712,984
@ $121.59 · 2026-01-05
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$45.61M
@ $121.63 · 2026-01-05
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$1.22M
@ $121.58 · 2026-01-05
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$717,689
@ $122.39 · 2025-12-22
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$775,711
@ $132.26 · 2025-12-05
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$15.86M
@ $132.13 · 2025-12-03
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$6.55M
@ $131.15 · 2025-12-03
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$6.07M
@ $121.33 · 2025-11-26
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$1.13M
@ $112.98 · 2025-11-24
WARNICK JASON
Chief Financial Officer
$39.84M
@ $132.81 · 2025-11-11
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$6.80M
@ $140.61 · 2025-11-04
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$3.65M
@ $145.95 · 2025-11-03
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$861,460
@ $146.91 · 2025-10-27
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$865,118
@ $147.53 · 2025-10-06
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$3.71M
@ $148.34 · 2025-10-03
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$104.80M
@ $139.73 · 2025-10-01
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$727,872
@ $124.13 · 2025-09-22
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$403.97M
@ $114.57 · 2025-09-15
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$585,514
@ $99.83 · 2025-09-05
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$2.52M
@ $100.92 · 2025-09-03
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$6.07M
@ $100.91 · 2025-09-03
WARNICK JASON
Chief Financial Officer
$11.09M
@ $110.93 · 2025-08-15
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$4.20M
@ $104.71 · 2025-08-05
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$2.61M
@ $104.23 · 2025-08-04
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$22.49M
@ $99.97 · 2025-08-01
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$614,141
@ $104.73 · 2025-07-25
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$39.28M
@ $101.90 · 2025-07-16
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$11.64M
@ $101.65 · 2025-07-14
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$548,353
@ $93.51 · 2025-07-07
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$2.35M
@ $93.88 · 2025-07-03
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$69.95M
@ $93.27 · 2025-07-01
WARNICK JASON
Chief Financial Officer
$15.77M
@ $90.09 · 2025-06-30
WARNICK JASON
Chief Financial Officer
$29.27M
@ $83.63 · 2025-06-25
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$7.84M
@ $84.96 · 2025-06-25
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$456,362
@ $77.82 · 2025-06-20
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$431,021
@ $73.49 · 2025-06-05
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$1.79M
@ $71.64 · 2025-06-03
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$7.36M
@ $70.14 · 2025-06-03
WARNICK JASON
Chief Financial Officer
$1.65M
@ $65.95 · 2025-05-27
WARNICK JASON
Chief Financial Officer
$3.10M
@ $61.98 · 2025-05-14
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TSLA
2
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $319.71M
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$899,077
@ $397.12 · 2026-03-06
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$10.69M
@ $415.56 · 2026-02-25
MUSK KIMBAL J
Director
$25.61M
@ $450.66 · 2025-12-09
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.17M
@ $443.93 · 2025-12-08
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$918,137
@ $352.45 · 2025-09-08
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.77M
@ $295.26 · 2025-07-08
ZHU XIAOTONG
Officer
$4.86M
@ $323.81 · 2025-06-12
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$732,573
@ $285.71 · 2025-06-09
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.40M
@ $342.30 · 2025-06-03
EHRENPREIS IRA MATTHEW
Director
$170.64M
@ $357.30 · 2025-05-27
MUSK KIMBAL J
Director
$32.73M
@ $357.39 · 2025-05-27
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.05M
@ $350.11 · 2025-05-16
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.20M
@ $300.00 · 2025-05-09
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$30.81M
@ $274.12 · 2025-05-06
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.14M
@ $284.40 · 2025-05-01
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$32.10M
@ $285.58 · 2025-04-29
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.00M
@ $250.00 · 2025-04-07
MURDOCH JAMES RUPERT
Director
$13.19M
@ $240.79 · 2025-03-10
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$718,111
@ $268.75 · 2025-03-06
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$33.67M
@ $299.61 · 2025-03-03
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.78M
@ $296.02 · 2025-03-03
MUSK KIMBAL J
Director
$27.59M
@ $367.87 · 2025-02-06
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$43.16M
@ $384.04 · 2025-02-03
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.68M
@ $383.11 · 2025-02-03
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.89M
@ $413.56 · 2025-01-06
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$41.16M
@ $411.63 · 2025-01-06
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$975,015
@ $374.29 · 2024-12-06
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$35.25M
@ $352.54 · 2024-12-04
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$39.79M
@ $354.06 · 2024-12-02
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.48M
@ $354.43 · 2024-12-02
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$35.34M
@ $314.44 · 2024-11-15
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$3.80M
@ $316.91 · 2024-11-11
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$34.60M
@ $346.02 · 2024-11-11
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.01M
@ $251.76 · 2024-11-01
MUSK KIMBAL J
Director
$15.14M
@ $250.23 · 2024-11-01
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.00M
@ $250.00 · 2024-10-24
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.00M
@ $250.00 · 2024-09-23
ZHU XIAOTONG
Officer
$65,867
@ $221.77 · 2024-09-06
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$14.60M
@ $219.96 · 2024-07-25
ZHU XIAOTONG
Officer
$113,151
@ $174.35 · 2024-06-06
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$17.32M
@ $184.86 · 2024-05-06
BAGLINO ANDREW D
Officer
$1.85M
@ $176.20 · 2024-04-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
HOOD
FearGreed
😨Fear(37/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TSLA
FearGreed
😐Neutral(47/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
HOOD
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
TSLA
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
View HOOD Full AnalysisView TSLA Full Analysis
Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) vs Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io