Compare Stocks › HOOD vs ORCL

Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) vs Oracle Corporation (ORCL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-02, HOOD is undervalued at $85, with a DCF intrinsic value of $164 and a margin of safety of 48%. ORCL is undervalued at $131, with an intrinsic value of $385 and a margin of safety of 66%. Of the two, ORCL has the wider margin of safety.

HOOD
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
$84.99
VS
ORCL
Oracle Corporation
$130.67

Rewards

HOOD
  • ★Gross margin of 91.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $11.86 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
ORCL
  • ★Gross margin of 64.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.80 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

HOOD
  • ⚠Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 2 out of 3 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • ⚠Beneish M-Score of -1.59 flags financial patterns consistent with potential earnings manipulation — warrants further investigation.
  • ⚠9 insider sales totaling $112.6M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
ORCL
  • ⚠Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • ⚠High leverage (1.97x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 1.57 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
HOOD
ORCL
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$-45.85B
N/A
FCF Yield
-11.58%
39.17
Trailing P/E
20.48
25.09
Forward P/E
11.84
Quality & Moat
5.92%
ROIC
8.55%
21.45%
ROE
41.19%
90.99%
Gross Margin
63.96%
1.38
PEG Ratio
0.73
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
1.97
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.84
0.00%
Dividend Yield
1.53%
HOOD: 2Ties: 1ORCL: 6
HOODORCL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
HOOD

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

ORCL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
HOOD
$34.39
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.75B
Δ Market Cap
+$94.67B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
ORCL
$3.60
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$25.08B
Δ Market Cap
+$90.30B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
HOOD
48.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 48.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $84.99
Fair Value: $164.05
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
ORCL
66.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 66.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $130.67
Fair Value: $384.55
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
HOOD

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

ORCL

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
HOOD
45/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
ORCL
67/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
HOOD
-1.59
Likely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
ORCL
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
HOOD
Insiders 1.0%Institutions 79.0%Retail & Other 20.0%
No. of Institutional Holders1,894
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
ORCL
Insiders 38.4%Institutions 43.5%Retail & Other 18.1%
No. of Institutional Holders4,494
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
HOOD
0
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $55.31M
MALKA MEYER
Director
$20.18M
@ $80.74 · 2026-06-05
MALKA MEYER
Director
$15.10M
@ $83.45 · 2026-06-03
MALKA MEYER
Director
$20.02M
@ $80.39 · 2026-05-28
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
ORCL
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $3.48M
RUSCKOWSKI STEPHEN H
Director
$3.48M
@ $139.35 · 2026-09-29
FAIRHEAD RONA ALISON
Director
$112,258
@ $233.87 · 2025-07-07
MOORMAN CHARLES W IV
Director
$947,913
@ $172.35 · 2025-02-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
HOOD
9
Sells (3M)
48
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $342.86M
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$1.14M
@ $113.71 · 2026-10-05
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$42.64M
@ $113.72 · 2026-10-05
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$30.18M
@ $125.33 · 2026-09-22
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$32.55M
@ $125.58 · 2026-09-21
VERMA SHIV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.27M
@ $110.42 · 2026-09-15
TRESEDER OLUWADARA JOHNSON
Director
$234,375
@ $125.00 · 2026-09-08
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$2.94M
@ $120.33 · 2026-09-03
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$1.22M
@ $122.43 · 2026-09-03
VERMA SHIV
Chief Financial Officer
$378,569
@ $95.07 · 2026-08-17
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$904,192
@ $90.42 · 2026-08-03
VERMA SHIV
Chief Financial Officer
$456,775
@ $114.71 · 2026-07-15
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$1.16M
@ $116.14 · 2026-07-06
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$43.56M
@ $116.17 · 2026-07-06
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$2.32M
@ $119.96 · 2026-07-02
TRESEDER OLUWADARA JOHNSON
Director
$440,625
@ $117.50 · 2026-07-02
LOOP PAULA
Director
$1.00M
@ $120.00 · 2026-07-02
VERMA SHIV
Chief Financial Officer
$393,779
@ $98.84 · 2026-06-15
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$931,024
@ $85.91 · 2026-06-03
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$836,771
@ $83.68 · 2026-06-03
VERMA SHIV
Chief Financial Officer
$420,536
@ $77.36 · 2026-05-15
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$768,908
@ $76.89 · 2026-05-04
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$489,687
@ $83.92 · 2026-04-27
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$725,302
@ $84.93 · 2026-04-15
VERMA SHIV
Chief Financial Officer
$466,717
@ $85.86 · 2026-04-15
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$698,451
@ $69.85 · 2026-04-06
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$407,575
@ $69.85 · 2026-04-06
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$26.19M
@ $69.83 · 2026-04-06
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$416,392
@ $71.36 · 2026-03-20
VERMA SHIV
Chief Financial Officer
$407,855
@ $75.00 · 2026-03-16
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$469,822
@ $80.50 · 2026-03-05
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$754,903
@ $75.49 · 2026-03-03
VERMA SHIV
Chief Financial Officer
$411,274
@ $75.13 · 2026-02-17
WARNICK JASON
Former
$10.64M
@ $85.09 · 2026-02-09
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$4.61M
@ $87.81 · 2026-02-03
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$870,665
@ $87.07 · 2026-02-03
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$630,284
@ $107.48 · 2026-01-26
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$1.22M
@ $121.58 · 2026-01-05
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$45.61M
@ $121.63 · 2026-01-05
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$712,984
@ $121.59 · 2026-01-05
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$717,689
@ $122.39 · 2025-12-22
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$775,711
@ $132.26 · 2025-12-05
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$6.55M
@ $131.15 · 2025-12-03
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$15.86M
@ $132.13 · 2025-12-03
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$6.07M
@ $121.33 · 2025-11-26
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$1.13M
@ $112.98 · 2025-11-24
WARNICK JASON
Chief Financial Officer
$39.84M
@ $132.81 · 2025-11-11
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$6.80M
@ $140.61 · 2025-11-04
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$3.65M
@ $145.95 · 2025-11-03
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$861,460
@ $146.91 · 2025-10-27
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$865,118
@ $147.53 · 2025-10-06
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$3.71M
@ $148.34 · 2025-10-03
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$104.80M
@ $139.73 · 2025-10-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
ORCL
3
Sells (3M)
10
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $85.34M
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$399,123
@ $151.70 · 2026-09-22
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Chief Executive Officer
$3.42M
@ $151.59 · 2026-09-22
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Chief Executive Officer
$1.52M
@ $139.94 · 2026-09-16
HENLEY JEFFREY O
Officer and Director
$63.66M
@ $159.16 · 2026-06-24
LEVEY STUART A
Officer
$2.64M
@ $176.19 · 2026-04-16
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.55M
@ $155.23 · 2026-02-09
KEHRING DOUGLAS A
Officer
$6.82M
@ $194.89 · 2026-01-15
HURA MARK
Officer
$2.95M
@ $196.89 · 2025-12-24
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$437,064
@ $196.61 · 2025-12-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.93M
@ $192.52 · 2025-12-19
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$2.80M
@ $280.31 · 2025-10-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$11.07M
@ $276.64 · 2025-10-21
LEVEY STUART A
Officer
$5.93M
@ $300.00 · 2025-10-10
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$641,958
@ $288.91 · 2025-09-26
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$10.87M
@ $321.16 · 2025-09-23
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$5.12M
@ $313.60 · 2025-09-16
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
President
$6.31M
@ $297.11 · 2025-09-12
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$4.04M
@ $254.48 · 2025-08-05
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$770,656
@ $233.32 · 2025-07-16
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$2.33M
@ $232.99 · 2025-07-03
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$267.24M
@ $212.01 · 2025-06-27
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$794.64M
@ $212.50 · 2025-06-26
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$764.01M
@ $206.77 · 2025-06-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Officer
$3.21M
@ $214.10 · 2025-06-17
CONRADES GEORGE HENRY
Director
$1.74M
@ $213.49 · 2025-06-17
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$428,562
@ $149.53 · 2025-05-05
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$291,620
@ $145.81 · 2025-04-02
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$705.46M
@ $185.40 · 2025-01-24
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
HOOD
FearGreed
😨Fear(29/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
ORCL
FearGreed
😨Fear(33/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
HOOD
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (29)
ORCL
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (33)
View HOOD Full AnalysisView ORCL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: HOOD vs ORCL

Is Robinhood Markets, Inc. or Oracle Corporation more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, ORCL trades at a 66.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $385 vs. price $131), compared to HOOD's 48.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $164 vs. $85).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Robinhood Markets, Inc. or Oracle Corporation?▼

ORCL scores 67/100 (Narrow moat), while HOOD scores 45/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Oracle Corporation in financial distress?▼

ORCL's Altman Z-Score of 1.6 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. HOOD scores 2.6 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Robinhood Markets, Inc. or Oracle Corporation?▼

ORCL earns 8.5% ROIC versus HOOD's 5.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Does Robinhood Markets, Inc. have accounting red flags?▼

HOOD's Beneish M-Score of -1.6 flags it as a likely earnings manipulator (above the -1.78 threshold). By contrast, ORCL scores -2.6, within the normal range. The Beneish model detects aggressive accounting through eight financial ratios.

HOOD vs ORCL: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io