Compare Stocks › HOOD vs LLY

Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) vs Eli Lilly and Company (LLY): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-02, HOOD is undervalued at $85, with a DCF intrinsic value of $164 and a margin of safety of 48%. LLY is fairly valued at $1418, with an intrinsic value of $1710 and a margin of safety of 17%. Of the two, HOOD has the wider margin of safety.

HOOD
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
$84.99
VS
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
$1417.54

Rewards

HOOD
  • ★Gross margin of 91.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $11.86 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
LLY
  • ★Eli Lilly and Company has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 83.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Eli Lilly and Company scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

HOOD
  • ⚠Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 2 out of 3 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • ⚠Beneish M-Score of -1.59 flags financial patterns consistent with potential earnings manipulation — warrants further investigation.
  • ⚠9 insider sales totaling $112.6M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
LLY
  • ⚠FCF yield of 0.7% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠Insiders have sold $10.0M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
HOOD
LLY
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$9.34B
N/A
FCF Yield
0.74%
39.17
Trailing P/E
46.01
25.09
Forward P/E
28.66
Quality & Moat
5.92%
ROIC
40.83%
21.45%
ROE
86.02%
90.99%
Gross Margin
83.63%
1.38
PEG Ratio
1.36
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
1.11
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.96
0.00%
Dividend Yield
0.49%
HOOD: 4Ties: 2LLY: 3
HOODLLY

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
HOOD

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

LLY

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
HOOD
$34.39
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.75B
Δ Market Cap
+$94.67B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
LLY
$27.49
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$22.34B
Δ Market Cap
+$614.01B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
HOOD
48.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 48.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $84.99
Fair Value: $164.05
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
LLY
17.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 17.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $1417.54
Fair Value: $1709.89
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
HOOD

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

LLY

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $1418?

+23.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +34.7%

The market implies +23.5% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +34.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
HOOD
45/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
LLY
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
HOOD
-1.59
Likely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
LLY
-1.83
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
HOOD
Insiders 1.0%Institutions 79.0%Retail & Other 20.0%
No. of Institutional Holders1,894
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
LLY
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 85.5%Retail & Other 14.4%
No. of Institutional Holders5,906
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
HOOD
0
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $55.31M
MALKA MEYER
Director
$20.18M
@ $80.74 · 2026-06-05
MALKA MEYER
Director
$15.10M
@ $83.45 · 2026-06-03
MALKA MEYER
Director
$20.02M
@ $80.39 · 2026-05-28
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
LLY
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
MONTARCE LUCAS E
Chief Financial Officer
$494,627
@ $691.79 · 2025-08-15
ALVAREZ RALPH
Director
$500,473
@ $660.25 · 2025-08-13
VAN NAARDEN JACOB S.
Officer
$647,360
@ $647.36 · 2025-08-13
SULZBERGER GABRIELLE
Director
$75,018
@ $641.18 · 2025-08-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
HOOD
9
Sells (3M)
48
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $342.86M
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$1.14M
@ $113.71 · 2026-10-05
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$42.64M
@ $113.72 · 2026-10-05
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$30.18M
@ $125.33 · 2026-09-22
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$32.55M
@ $125.58 · 2026-09-21
VERMA SHIV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.27M
@ $110.42 · 2026-09-15
TRESEDER OLUWADARA JOHNSON
Director
$234,375
@ $125.00 · 2026-09-08
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$2.94M
@ $120.33 · 2026-09-03
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$1.22M
@ $122.43 · 2026-09-03
VERMA SHIV
Chief Financial Officer
$378,569
@ $95.07 · 2026-08-17
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$904,192
@ $90.42 · 2026-08-03
VERMA SHIV
Chief Financial Officer
$456,775
@ $114.71 · 2026-07-15
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$1.16M
@ $116.14 · 2026-07-06
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$43.56M
@ $116.17 · 2026-07-06
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$2.32M
@ $119.96 · 2026-07-02
TRESEDER OLUWADARA JOHNSON
Director
$440,625
@ $117.50 · 2026-07-02
LOOP PAULA
Director
$1.00M
@ $120.00 · 2026-07-02
VERMA SHIV
Chief Financial Officer
$393,779
@ $98.84 · 2026-06-15
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$931,024
@ $85.91 · 2026-06-03
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$836,771
@ $83.68 · 2026-06-03
VERMA SHIV
Chief Financial Officer
$420,536
@ $77.36 · 2026-05-15
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$768,908
@ $76.89 · 2026-05-04
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$489,687
@ $83.92 · 2026-04-27
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$725,302
@ $84.93 · 2026-04-15
VERMA SHIV
Chief Financial Officer
$466,717
@ $85.86 · 2026-04-15
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$698,451
@ $69.85 · 2026-04-06
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$407,575
@ $69.85 · 2026-04-06
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$26.19M
@ $69.83 · 2026-04-06
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$416,392
@ $71.36 · 2026-03-20
VERMA SHIV
Chief Financial Officer
$407,855
@ $75.00 · 2026-03-16
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$469,822
@ $80.50 · 2026-03-05
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$754,903
@ $75.49 · 2026-03-03
VERMA SHIV
Chief Financial Officer
$411,274
@ $75.13 · 2026-02-17
WARNICK JASON
Former
$10.64M
@ $85.09 · 2026-02-09
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$4.61M
@ $87.81 · 2026-02-03
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$870,665
@ $87.07 · 2026-02-03
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$630,284
@ $107.48 · 2026-01-26
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$1.22M
@ $121.58 · 2026-01-05
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$45.61M
@ $121.63 · 2026-01-05
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$712,984
@ $121.59 · 2026-01-05
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$717,689
@ $122.39 · 2025-12-22
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$775,711
@ $132.26 · 2025-12-05
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$6.55M
@ $131.15 · 2025-12-03
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$15.86M
@ $132.13 · 2025-12-03
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$6.07M
@ $121.33 · 2025-11-26
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$1.13M
@ $112.98 · 2025-11-24
WARNICK JASON
Chief Financial Officer
$39.84M
@ $132.81 · 2025-11-11
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$6.80M
@ $140.61 · 2025-11-04
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$3.65M
@ $145.95 · 2025-11-03
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$861,460
@ $146.91 · 2025-10-27
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$865,118
@ $147.53 · 2025-10-06
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$3.71M
@ $148.34 · 2025-10-03
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$104.80M
@ $139.73 · 2025-10-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
LLY
2
Sells (3M)
27
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.40B
JONSSON PATRIK
Officer
$7.64M
@ $1175.10 · 2026-08-17
ZAKROWSKI DONALD A
Officer
$2.37M
@ $1185.01 · 2026-08-10
YUFFA ILYA
Officer
$2.88M
@ $1150.77 · 2026-06-10
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$15.75M
@ $995.36 · 2026-05-06
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$322.38M
@ $1103.48 · 2026-01-07
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$1.51M
@ $1085.01 · 2026-01-05
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$3.90M
@ $1085.04 · 2025-12-29
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$2.85M
@ $1085.17 · 2025-12-24
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$260,409
@ $1085.04 · 2025-12-23
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$161.08M
@ $1095.35 · 2025-11-25
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$17.34M
@ $1109.30 · 2025-11-25
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$152.06M
@ $1068.52 · 2025-11-24
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$111.50M
@ $1058.66 · 2025-11-21
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$39.07M
@ $1051.66 · 2025-11-20
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$176.10M
@ $1051.17 · 2025-11-19
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$62.31M
@ $1034.78 · 2025-11-18
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$10.19M
@ $1030.68 · 2025-11-17
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$183.80M
@ $1030.87 · 2025-11-14
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$48.02M
@ $1030.26 · 2025-11-13
ZAKROWSKI DONALD A
Officer
$1.01M
@ $1010.50 · 2025-11-13
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$308.41M
@ $1011.18 · 2025-11-12
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$279.35M
@ $986.64 · 2025-11-11
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$16.41M
@ $972.52 · 2025-11-10
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$38.47M
@ $951.56 · 2025-11-05
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$167.09M
@ $933.26 · 2025-11-05
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$479,038
@ $910.72 · 2025-11-04
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$266.65M
@ $888.83 · 2025-11-03
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$260.17M
@ $863.35 · 2025-10-31
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$3.16M
@ $863.24 · 2025-10-10
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$9.04M
@ $852.49 · 2025-10-09
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$86.23M
@ $850.27 · 2025-10-08
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$22.72M
@ $848.01 · 2025-10-07
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$137.04M
@ $850.22 · 2025-10-06
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$161.22M
@ $837.93 · 2025-10-03
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$92.50M
@ $821.55 · 2025-10-02
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$107.36M
@ $794.15 · 2025-10-01
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$177.29M
@ $821.47 · 2025-10-01
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$86.79M
@ $763.39 · 2025-09-30
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$18.06M
@ $763.09 · 2025-09-19
LILLY ENDOWMENT, INC.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$81.53M
@ $764.65 · 2025-09-18
ZAKROWSKI DONALD A
Officer
$734,930
@ $734.93 · 2025-08-28
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
HOOD
FearGreed
😨Fear(29/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
LLY
FearGreed
😏Greed(73/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
HOOD
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (29)
LLY
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
View HOOD Full AnalysisView LLY Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: HOOD vs LLY

Is Robinhood Markets, Inc. or Eli Lilly and Company more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, HOOD trades at a 48.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $164 vs. price $85), compared to LLY's 17.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $1710 vs. $1418).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Robinhood Markets, Inc. or Eli Lilly and Company?▼

LLY scores 73/100 (Wide moat), while HOOD scores 45/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Robinhood Markets, Inc. in financial distress?▼

HOOD's Altman Z-Score of 2.6 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. LLY scores 8.7 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Robinhood Markets, Inc. or Eli Lilly and Company?▼

LLY earns 40.8% ROIC versus HOOD's 5.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Does Robinhood Markets, Inc. have accounting red flags?▼

HOOD's Beneish M-Score of -1.6 flags it as a likely earnings manipulator (above the -1.78 threshold). By contrast, LLY scores -1.8, within the normal range. The Beneish model detects aggressive accounting through eight financial ratios.

HOOD vs LLY: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io