Compare Stocks › HOOD vs INTU

Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) vs Intuit Inc. (INTU): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-02, HOOD is undervalued at $85, with a DCF intrinsic value of $164 and a margin of safety of 48%. INTU is undervalued at $341, with an intrinsic value of $568 and a margin of safety of 40%. Of the two, HOOD has the wider margin of safety.

HOOD
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
$84.99
VS
INTU
Intuit Inc.
$341.09

Rewards

HOOD
  • ★Gross margin of 91.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $11.86 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
INTU
  • ★Intuit Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • ★Gross margin of 81.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Intuit Inc. scores 94/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

HOOD
  • ⚠Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 2 out of 3 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • ⚠Beneish M-Score of -1.59 flags financial patterns consistent with potential earnings manipulation — warrants further investigation.
  • ⚠9 insider sales totaling $112.6M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
INTU

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    HOOD
    INTU
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $8.62B
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    9.45%
    39.17
    Trailing P/E
    20.72
    25.09
    Forward P/E
    12.66
    Quality & Moat
    5.92%
    ROIC
    10.90%
    21.45%
    ROE
    23.60%
    90.99%
    Gross Margin
    80.98%
    1.38
    PEG Ratio
    1.08
    Balance Sheet Safety
    Net cash
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.06
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    N/A
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.18
    0.00%
    Dividend Yield
    1.62%
    HOOD: 2Ties: 1INTU: 6
    HOODINTU

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    HOOD

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    INTU

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    HOOD
    $34.39
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $2.75B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$94.67B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTU
    $-10.70
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $7.83B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-83.73B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    HOOD
    48.2% Margin of Safety
    Price is 48.2% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $84.99
    Fair Value: $164.05
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTU
    39.9% Margin of Safety
    Price is 39.9% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $341.09
    Fair Value: $567.66
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    HOOD

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    INTU

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $341?

    +6.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -0.9%

    The market implies +6.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -0.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    HOOD
    45/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTU
    94/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    HOOD
    -1.59
    Likely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTU
    -2.98
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    HOOD
    Insiders 1.0%Institutions 79.0%Retail & Other 20.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,894
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTU
    Insiders 2.4%Institutions 93.2%Retail & Other 4.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,538
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    HOOD
    0
    Buys (3M)
    3
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $55.31M
    MALKA MEYER
    Director
    $20.18M
    @ $80.74 · 2026-06-05
    MALKA MEYER
    Director
    $15.10M
    @ $83.45 · 2026-06-03
    MALKA MEYER
    Director
    $20.02M
    @ $80.39 · 2026-05-28
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTU
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $541,665
    PRABHU VASANT M.
    Director
    $541,665
    @ $309.52 · 2026-05-26
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    HOOD
    9
    Sells (3M)
    48
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $342.86M
    GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
    Officer
    $1.14M
    @ $113.71 · 2026-10-05
    TENEV VLADIMIR
    Chief Executive Officer
    $42.64M
    @ $113.72 · 2026-10-05
    TENEV VLADIMIR
    Chief Executive Officer
    $30.18M
    @ $125.33 · 2026-09-22
    TENEV VLADIMIR
    Chief Executive Officer
    $32.55M
    @ $125.58 · 2026-09-21
    VERMA SHIV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.27M
    @ $110.42 · 2026-09-15
    TRESEDER OLUWADARA JOHNSON
    Director
    $234,375
    @ $125.00 · 2026-09-08
    QUIRK STEVEN M
    Officer
    $2.94M
    @ $120.33 · 2026-09-03
    GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
    Officer
    $1.22M
    @ $122.43 · 2026-09-03
    VERMA SHIV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $378,569
    @ $95.07 · 2026-08-17
    GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
    Officer
    $904,192
    @ $90.42 · 2026-08-03
    VERMA SHIV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $456,775
    @ $114.71 · 2026-07-15
    GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
    Officer
    $1.16M
    @ $116.14 · 2026-07-06
    TENEV VLADIMIR
    Chief Executive Officer
    $43.56M
    @ $116.17 · 2026-07-06
    QUIRK STEVEN M
    Officer
    $2.32M
    @ $119.96 · 2026-07-02
    TRESEDER OLUWADARA JOHNSON
    Director
    $440,625
    @ $117.50 · 2026-07-02
    LOOP PAULA
    Director
    $1.00M
    @ $120.00 · 2026-07-02
    VERMA SHIV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $393,779
    @ $98.84 · 2026-06-15
    QUIRK STEVEN M
    Officer
    $931,024
    @ $85.91 · 2026-06-03
    GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
    Officer
    $836,771
    @ $83.68 · 2026-06-03
    VERMA SHIV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $420,536
    @ $77.36 · 2026-05-15
    GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
    Officer
    $768,908
    @ $76.89 · 2026-05-04
    PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
    Chief Technology Officer
    $489,687
    @ $83.92 · 2026-04-27
    QUIRK STEVEN M
    Officer
    $725,302
    @ $84.93 · 2026-04-15
    VERMA SHIV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $466,717
    @ $85.86 · 2026-04-15
    GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
    Officer
    $698,451
    @ $69.85 · 2026-04-06
    PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
    Chief Technology Officer
    $407,575
    @ $69.85 · 2026-04-06
    TENEV VLADIMIR
    Chief Executive Officer
    $26.19M
    @ $69.83 · 2026-04-06
    PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
    Chief Technology Officer
    $416,392
    @ $71.36 · 2026-03-20
    VERMA SHIV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $407,855
    @ $75.00 · 2026-03-16
    PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
    Chief Technology Officer
    $469,822
    @ $80.50 · 2026-03-05
    GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
    Officer
    $754,903
    @ $75.49 · 2026-03-03
    VERMA SHIV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $411,274
    @ $75.13 · 2026-02-17
    WARNICK JASON
    Former
    $10.64M
    @ $85.09 · 2026-02-09
    QUIRK STEVEN M
    Officer
    $4.61M
    @ $87.81 · 2026-02-03
    GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
    Officer
    $870,665
    @ $87.07 · 2026-02-03
    PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
    Chief Technology Officer
    $630,284
    @ $107.48 · 2026-01-26
    GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
    Officer
    $1.22M
    @ $121.58 · 2026-01-05
    TENEV VLADIMIR
    Chief Executive Officer
    $45.61M
    @ $121.63 · 2026-01-05
    PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
    Chief Technology Officer
    $712,984
    @ $121.59 · 2026-01-05
    PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
    Chief Technology Officer
    $717,689
    @ $122.39 · 2025-12-22
    PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
    Chief Technology Officer
    $775,711
    @ $132.26 · 2025-12-05
    QUIRK STEVEN M
    Officer
    $6.55M
    @ $131.15 · 2025-12-03
    GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
    Officer
    $15.86M
    @ $132.13 · 2025-12-03
    GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
    Officer
    $6.07M
    @ $121.33 · 2025-11-26
    GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
    Officer
    $1.13M
    @ $112.98 · 2025-11-24
    WARNICK JASON
    Chief Financial Officer
    $39.84M
    @ $132.81 · 2025-11-11
    QUIRK STEVEN M
    Officer
    $6.80M
    @ $140.61 · 2025-11-04
    GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
    Officer
    $3.65M
    @ $145.95 · 2025-11-03
    PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
    Chief Technology Officer
    $861,460
    @ $146.91 · 2025-10-27
    PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
    Chief Technology Officer
    $865,118
    @ $147.53 · 2025-10-06
    GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
    Officer
    $3.71M
    @ $148.34 · 2025-10-03
    TENEV VLADIMIR
    Chief Executive Officer
    $104.80M
    @ $139.73 · 2025-10-01
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTU
    2
    Sells (3M)
    10
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $3.54M
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $92,728
    @ $325.36 · 2026-09-08
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $314,288
    @ $346.90 · 2026-08-27
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $74,499
    @ $262.32 · 2026-06-23
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $80,145
    @ $282.20 · 2026-06-16
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $289,448
    @ $288.29 · 2026-06-11
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $457,046
    @ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $840,097
    @ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $741,172
    @ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $219,763
    @ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $435,354
    @ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $792,160
    @ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $665,951
    @ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $27,930
    @ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $255,887
    @ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $521,891
    @ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $689,400
    @ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.03M
    @ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.25M
    @ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $887,583
    @ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $1.36M
    @ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.12M
    @ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $26.12M
    @ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $19.29M
    @ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $30.46M
    @ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
    MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
    General Counsel
    $12.18M
    @ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $11.66M
    @ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $340,143
    @ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $5.00M
    @ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $4.43M
    @ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
    BURTON EVE B
    Director
    $1.02M
    @ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    HOOD
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(29/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTU
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(41/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    HOOD
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (29)
    INTU
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (41)
    View HOOD Full AnalysisView INTU Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: HOOD vs INTU

    Is Robinhood Markets, Inc. or Intuit Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, HOOD trades at a 48.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $164 vs. price $85), compared to INTU's 39.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $568 vs. $341).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Robinhood Markets, Inc. or Intuit Inc.?▼

    INTU scores 94/100 (Wide moat), while HOOD scores 45/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Robinhood Markets, Inc. in financial distress?▼

    HOOD's Altman Z-Score of 2.6 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTU scores 5.1 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Robinhood Markets, Inc. or Intuit Inc.?▼

    INTU earns 10.9% ROIC versus HOOD's 5.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Does Robinhood Markets, Inc. have accounting red flags?▼

    HOOD's Beneish M-Score of -1.6 flags it as a likely earnings manipulator (above the -1.78 threshold). By contrast, INTU scores -3.0, within the normal range. The Beneish model detects aggressive accounting through eight financial ratios.

    HOOD vs INTU: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io