Compare Stocks › HOOD vs INTC
Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)
HOOD
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
$73.66
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$99.61
Rewards
HOOD
- ★Gross margin of 92.2% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
- ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $11.75 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
INTC
Risks
HOOD
- ⚠Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 2 out of 3 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
- ⚠PEG ratio of 13.24 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
- ⚠Beneish M-Score of -1.59 flags financial patterns consistent with potential earnings manipulation — warrants further investigation.
INTC
- ⚠Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
Key Valuation Metrics
Learn more →HOOD
INTC
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$-8.30B
N/A
FCF Yield
-1.66%
35.76
Trailing P/E
N/A
28.82
Forward P/E
66.78
Quality & Moat
6.03%
ROIC
1.72%
19.44%
ROE
-0.21%
92.24%
Gross Margin
37.20%
13.24
PEG Ratio
1.36
Balance Sheet Safety
1.40
Debt / Equity
0.36
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.86
N/A
Dividend Yield
N/A
HOOD: 4Ties: 1INTC: 2
HOODINTC
Historical Fundamentals
Learn more →HOOD
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
INTC
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
$1 Retained Earnings Test
Learn more →HOOD
$34.39
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.75B
Δ Market Cap
+$94.67B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
INTC
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-22.02B
Δ Market Cap
+$74.94B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis
Learn more →HOOD
20.6% Margin of Safety
Price is 20.6% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $73.66
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
Fair Value: $92.78
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
INTC
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $99.61
Strongly undervalued
Strongly overvalued
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth
Learn more →HOOD
Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.
INTC
Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.
Economic Moat Score
Learn more →HOOD
45/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None
Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.
Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
INTC
17/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None
No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.
Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
Forensic Accounting
Learn more →HOOD
-1.59
Likely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
M-Score Trend
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
INTC
-2.59
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
M-Score Trend
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
Ownership Breakdown
Learn more →HOOD
Insiders 0.7%Institutions 73.7%Retail & Other 25.6%
No. of Institutional Holders1,782
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
INTC
Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
No. of Institutional Holders3,201
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
Insider Buying Activity
Learn more →HOOD
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
INTC
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $249,985
ZINSNER DAVID A
Chief Financial Officer
$249,985
@ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
GELSINGER PATRICK P
Chief Executive Officer
$251,198
@ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
GELSINGER PATRICK P
Chief Executive Officer
$251,946
@ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.
Insider Selling Activity
Learn more →HOOD
12
Sells (3M)
49
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $918.87M
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$489,687
@ $83.92 · 2026-04-27
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$725,302
@ $84.93 · 2026-04-15
VERMA SHIV
Chief Financial Officer
$466,717
@ $85.86 · 2026-04-15
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$698,451
@ $69.85 · 2026-04-06
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$26.19M
@ $69.83 · 2026-04-06
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$407,575
@ $69.85 · 2026-04-06
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$416,392
@ $71.36 · 2026-03-20
VERMA SHIV
Chief Financial Officer
$407,855
@ $75.00 · 2026-03-16
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$469,822
@ $80.50 · 2026-03-05
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$754,903
@ $75.49 · 2026-03-03
VERMA SHIV
Chief Financial Officer
$411,274
@ $75.13 · 2026-02-17
WARNICK JASON
Former
$10.64M
@ $85.09 · 2026-02-09
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$4.61M
@ $87.81 · 2026-02-03
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$870,665
@ $87.07 · 2026-02-03
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$630,284
@ $107.48 · 2026-01-26
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$1.22M
@ $121.58 · 2026-01-05
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$45.61M
@ $121.63 · 2026-01-05
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$712,984
@ $121.59 · 2026-01-05
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$717,689
@ $122.39 · 2025-12-22
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$775,711
@ $132.26 · 2025-12-05
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$6.55M
@ $131.15 · 2025-12-03
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$15.86M
@ $132.13 · 2025-12-03
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$6.07M
@ $121.33 · 2025-11-26
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$1.13M
@ $112.98 · 2025-11-24
WARNICK JASON
Chief Financial Officer
$39.84M
@ $132.81 · 2025-11-11
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$6.80M
@ $140.61 · 2025-11-04
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$3.65M
@ $145.95 · 2025-11-03
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$861,460
@ $146.91 · 2025-10-27
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$865,118
@ $147.53 · 2025-10-06
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$3.71M
@ $148.34 · 2025-10-03
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$104.80M
@ $139.73 · 2025-10-01
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$727,872
@ $124.13 · 2025-09-22
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$403.97M
@ $114.57 · 2025-09-15
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$585,514
@ $99.83 · 2025-09-05
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$6.07M
@ $100.91 · 2025-09-03
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$2.52M
@ $100.92 · 2025-09-03
WARNICK JASON
Chief Financial Officer
$11.09M
@ $110.93 · 2025-08-15
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$4.20M
@ $104.71 · 2025-08-05
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$2.61M
@ $104.23 · 2025-08-04
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$22.49M
@ $99.97 · 2025-08-01
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$614,141
@ $104.73 · 2025-07-25
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$39.28M
@ $101.90 · 2025-07-16
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$11.64M
@ $101.65 · 2025-07-14
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$548,353
@ $93.51 · 2025-07-07
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$2.35M
@ $93.88 · 2025-07-03
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$69.95M
@ $93.27 · 2025-07-01
WARNICK JASON
Chief Financial Officer
$15.77M
@ $90.09 · 2025-06-30
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$7.84M
@ $84.96 · 2025-06-25
WARNICK JASON
Chief Financial Officer
$29.27M
@ $83.63 · 2025-06-25
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
INTC
0
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $981,000
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$981,000
@ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
General Counsel
$650,000
@ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.
🎭 Mr. Market's Mood
Learn more →HOOD
😨Fear(36/100)
"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"
Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
INTC
😏Greed(74/100)
"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"
Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
⚖️ Buffett Signal
Learn more →HOOD
⚪Awaiting DCF Data
The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.
DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (36)
INTC
⚪Awaiting DCF Data
The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.
DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)