Compare StocksHON vs PM

Honeywell International Inc. (HON) vs Philip Morris International Inc (PM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, HON is undervalued at $243, with a DCF intrinsic value of $653 and a margin of safety of 63%. PM is overvalued at $191, with an intrinsic value of $151 and a margin of safety of -26%. Of the two, HON has the wider margin of safety.

HON
Honeywell International Inc.
$243.05
VS
PM
Philip Morris International Inc
$190.82

Rewards

HON
  • Honeywell International Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Honeywell International Inc. scores 85/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
PM
  • Philip Morris International Inc has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 67.5% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Philip Morris International Inc scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

HON
  • FCF yield of 7.0% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 3.84 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Insiders have sold $4.2M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
PM
  • PEG ratio of 2.49 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
HON
PM
Valuation
$5.42B
Free Cash Flow
$9.71B
7.04%
FCF Yield
3.27%
9.34
Trailing P/E
26.18
24.27
Forward P/E
20.81
Quality & Moat
11.31%
ROIC
27.36%
46.58%
ROE
N/A
36.51%
Gross Margin
67.48%
3.84
PEG Ratio
2.49
Balance Sheet Safety
1.37
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
3.03
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.39
1.15%
Dividend Yield
3.08%
HON: 2Ties: 1PM: 7
HONPM

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
HON

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
HON
$-0.78
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$7.36B
Δ Market Cap
$-5.72B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PM
$64.75
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.43B
Δ Market Cap
+$92.79B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
HON
62.8% Margin of Safety
Price is 62.8% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $243.05
Fair Value: $652.73
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PM
26.2% Overvalued
Price is 26.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $190.82
Fair Value: $151.16
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
HON

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $243?

+7.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +7.0%

The market implies +7.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +7.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

PM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $191?

+12.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +15.3%

The market implies +12.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
HON
85/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PM
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
HON
-2.60
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PM
-2.39
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
HON
Insiders 0.0%Institutions 81.3%Retail & Other 18.7%
No. of Institutional Holders3,025
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PM
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 84.1%Retail & Other 15.7%
No. of Institutional Holders3,473
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
HON
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
HON
1
Sells (3M)
8
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $19.92M
WEST KENNETH J
Officer
$4.15M
@ $243.77 · 2026-07-27
CURRIER JAMES E
Officer
$547,725
@ $243.65 · 2026-03-02
WEST KENNETH J
Officer
$211,877
@ $242.70 · 2026-03-02
LIEBLEIN GRACE D
Director
$1.43M
@ $243.73 · 2026-02-23
DAVIS D. SCOTT
Director
$568,080
@ $240.00 · 2026-02-19
MAILLOUX ROBERT D
Officer
$1.26M
@ $239.00 · 2026-02-06
MAILLOUX ROBERT D
Officer
$2.42M
@ $229.00 · 2026-01-30
BOLDEA LUCIAN
Officer
$9.34M
@ $221.58 · 2025-08-27
WEST KENNETH J
Officer
$752,026
@ $218.10 · 2025-08-01
MADDEN ANNE T
General Counsel
$6.00M
@ $207.89 · 2025-02-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PM
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $27.72M
KENNEDY STACEY
Officer
$2.63M
@ $183.13 · 2026-02-20
BABEAU EMMANUEL
Officer
$6.14M
@ $181.61 · 2026-02-19
GUERIN YANN
Officer
$726,760
@ $181.69 · 2026-02-19
OLCZAK JACEK
Officer and Director
$14.57M
@ $182.18 · 2026-02-19
DE WILDE FREDERIC J
Officer
$3.65M
@ $182.58 · 2026-02-19
DAHLGREN LARS
Officer
$562,740
@ $152.96 · 2025-03-06
ANDOLINA MASSIMO
Officer
$2.73M
@ $156.05 · 2025-02-24
BABEAU EMMANUEL
Chief Financial Officer
$4.47M
@ $148.85 · 2025-02-20
GUERIN YANN
General Counsel
$378,200
@ $151.28 · 2025-02-20
OLCZAK JACEK
Chief Executive Officer
$5.95M
@ $148.87 · 2025-02-20
CALANTZOPOULOS ANDRE
Chairman of the Board
$6.06M
@ $149.06 · 2025-02-20
BARTH WERNER
Officer
$1.49M
@ $148.67 · 2025-02-20
DE WILDE FREDERIC J
Officer
$2.17M
@ $144.54 · 2025-02-07
VOLPETTI STEFANO
Officer
$1.32M
@ $132.48 · 2024-10-31
CALANTZOPOULOS ANDRE
Chairman of the Board
$13.23M
@ $129.85 · 2024-10-23
DE WILDE FREDERIC J
Officer
$3.27M
@ $130.96 · 2024-10-23
BARTH WERNER
Officer
$974,850
@ $129.98 · 2024-10-23
DE WILDE FREDERIC J
Officer
$2.39M
@ $119.30 · 2024-08-22
ANDOLINA MASSIMO
Officer
$1.04M
@ $115.35 · 2024-08-08
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
HON
FearGreed
😏Greed(66/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PM
FearGreed
😏Greed(62/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
HON
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (66)
PM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
View HON Full AnalysisView PM Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: HON vs PM

Is Honeywell International Inc. or Philip Morris International Inc more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, HON trades at a 62.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $653 vs. price $243), compared to PM's -26.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $151 vs. $191).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Honeywell International Inc. or Philip Morris International Inc?

PM scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while HON scores 85/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Honeywell International Inc. in financial distress?

HON's Altman Z-Score of 2.5 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. PM scores 3.9 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Honeywell International Inc. or Philip Morris International Inc?

Honeywell International Inc. (HON) generates a 7.0% free cash flow yield, compared to Philip Morris International Inc's 3.3%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Honeywell International Inc. or Philip Morris International Inc?

PM earns 27.4% ROIC versus HON's 11.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Honeywell International Inc.'s or Philip Morris International Inc's?

HON's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to PM's 34/100 (Unsafe). HON has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.