Compare StocksHON vs NFLX

Honeywell International Inc. (HON) vs Netflix, Inc. (NFLX): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, HON is undervalued at $243, with a DCF intrinsic value of $653 and a margin of safety of 63%. NFLX is undervalued at $72, with an intrinsic value of $127 and a margin of safety of 44%. Of the two, HON has the wider margin of safety.

HON
Honeywell International Inc.
$243.05
VS
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
$71.71

Rewards

HON
  • Honeywell International Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Honeywell International Inc. scores 85/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
NFLX
  • Netflix, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Netflix, Inc. scores 85/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 80.1% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

HON
  • FCF yield of 7.0% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 3.84 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Insiders have sold $4.2M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
NFLX
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 2 out of 3 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • Insiders have sold $39.3M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
HON
NFLX
Valuation
$5.42B
Free Cash Flow
$25.39B
7.04%
FCF Yield
8.50%
9.34
Trailing P/E
22.55
24.27
Forward P/E
18.78
Quality & Moat
11.31%
ROIC
27.25%
46.58%
ROE
49.54%
36.51%
Gross Margin
49.12%
3.84
PEG Ratio
1.61
Balance Sheet Safety
1.37
Net Debt / Equity
0.25
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
3.03
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.51
1.15%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
HON: 2Ties: 1NFLX: 9
HONNFLX

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
HON

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

NFLX

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
HON
$-0.78
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$7.36B
Δ Market Cap
$-5.72B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
NFLX
$10.54
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$25.10B
Δ Market Cap
+$264.55B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
HON
62.8% Margin of Safety
Price is 62.8% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $243.05
Fair Value: $652.73
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
NFLX
43.6% Margin of Safety
Price is 43.6% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $71.71
Fair Value: $127.15
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
HON

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $243?

+7.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +7.0%

The market implies +7.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +7.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

NFLX

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $72?

-0.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +0.8%

The market implies -0.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +0.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
HON
85/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
NFLX
85/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
HON
-2.60
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
NFLX
-1.96
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
HON
Insiders 0.0%Institutions 81.3%Retail & Other 18.7%
No. of Institutional Holders3,025
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
NFLX
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 86.0%Retail & Other 13.4%
No. of Institutional Holders4,580
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
HON
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
NFLX
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
HON
1
Sells (3M)
8
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $19.92M
WEST KENNETH J
Officer
$4.15M
@ $243.77 · 2026-07-27
CURRIER JAMES E
Officer
$547,725
@ $243.65 · 2026-03-02
WEST KENNETH J
Officer
$211,877
@ $242.70 · 2026-03-02
LIEBLEIN GRACE D
Director
$1.43M
@ $243.73 · 2026-02-23
DAVIS D. SCOTT
Director
$568,080
@ $240.00 · 2026-02-19
MAILLOUX ROBERT D
Officer
$1.26M
@ $239.00 · 2026-02-06
MAILLOUX ROBERT D
Officer
$2.42M
@ $229.00 · 2026-01-30
BOLDEA LUCIAN
Officer
$9.34M
@ $221.58 · 2025-08-27
WEST KENNETH J
Officer
$752,026
@ $218.10 · 2025-08-01
MADDEN ANNE T
General Counsel
$6.00M
@ $207.89 · 2025-02-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
NFLX
4
Sells (3M)
38
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $481.74M
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
Director
$2.79M
@ $77.52 · 2026-06-17
HASTINGS REED
Director
$33.24M
@ $85.97 · 2026-06-01
PETERS GREGORY K.
Chief Executive Officer
$2.42M
@ $88.69 · 2026-05-07
NEUMANN SPENCER ADAM
Chief Financial Officer
$823,075
@ $88.95 · 2026-05-07
HYMAN DAVID A
Officer
$504,021
@ $88.08 · 2026-05-05
SARANDOS THEODORE ANTHONY JR.
Chief Executive Officer
$2.40M
@ $87.97 · 2026-05-05
HASTINGS REED
Director
$37.96M
@ $93.13 · 2026-05-01
NEUMANN SPENCER ADAM
Chief Financial Officer
$2.81M
@ $98.00 · 2026-04-02
HASTINGS REED
Director
$40.16M
@ $95.49 · 2026-04-01
HASTINGS REED
Director
$39.83M
@ $97.01 · 2026-03-02
NEUMANN SPENCER ADAM
Chief Financial Officer
$2.78M
@ $97.00 · 2026-03-02
NEUMANN SPENCER ADAM
Chief Financial Officer
$5.47M
@ $95.50 · 2026-02-27
WILLEMS CLETUS R
Officer
$259,253
@ $82.67 · 2026-02-10
PETERS GREGORY K.
Chief Executive Officer
$2.27M
@ $83.24 · 2026-02-10
HYMAN DAVID A
Officer
$464,231
@ $81.06 · 2026-02-09
NEUMANN SPENCER ADAM
Chief Financial Officer
$751,598
@ $81.27 · 2026-02-06
HASTINGS REED
Director
$32.70M
@ $83.63 · 2026-02-02
PETERS GREGORY K.
Chief Executive Officer
$8.77M
@ $82.94 · 2026-01-29
HYMAN DAVID A
Officer
$2.07M
@ $88.11 · 2026-01-16
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
Director
$2.82M
@ $88.86 · 2026-01-15
HASTINGS REED
Director
$39.08M
@ $91.67 · 2026-01-02
HASTINGS REED
Director
$40.71M
@ $108.43 · 2025-12-01
WILLEMS CLETUS R
Officer
$261,879
@ $1100.33 · 2025-11-06
HYMAN DAVID A
Officer
$34.60M
@ $1099.84 · 2025-11-04
PETERS GREGORY K.
Chief Executive Officer
$2.22M
@ $1095.68 · 2025-11-04
SARANDOS THEODORE ANTHONY JR.
Chief Executive Officer
$2.21M
@ $1092.08 · 2025-11-04
NEUMANN SPENCER ADAM
Chief Financial Officer
$2.59M
@ $1097.56 · 2025-11-03
NEUMANN SPENCER ADAM
Chief Financial Officer
$269,200
@ $1121.67 · 2025-11-03
HASTINGS REED
Director
$45.28M
@ $1121.51 · 2025-10-31
HASTINGS REED
Director
$49.43M
@ $1171.92 · 2025-10-01
NEUMANN SPENCER ADAM
Chief Financial Officer
$3.05M
@ $1172.51 · 2025-10-01
HASTINGS REED
Director
$31.35M
@ $1207.71 · 2025-09-02
NEUMANN SPENCER ADAM
Chief Financial Officer
$3.14M
@ $1207.76 · 2025-09-02
WILLEMS CLETUS R
Officer
$274,538
@ $1153.52 · 2025-08-06
NEUMANN SPENCER ADAM
Chief Financial Officer
$795,432
@ $1161.21 · 2025-08-06
HYMAN DAVID A
Officer
$491,276
@ $1158.67 · 2025-08-05
PETERS GREGORY K.
Chief Executive Officer
$2.34M
@ $1157.44 · 2025-08-05
SARANDOS THEODORE ANTHONY JR.
Chief Executive Officer
$2.35M
@ $1160.62 · 2025-08-05
HASTINGS REED
Director
$26.46M
@ $1162.45 · 2025-08-01
NEUMANN SPENCER ADAM
Chief Financial Officer
$3.02M
@ $1162.40 · 2025-08-01
HASTINGS REED
Director
$21.82M
@ $1295.78 · 2025-07-01
HASTINGS REED
Director
$12.86M
@ $1329.11 · 2025-07-01
MASIYIWA STRIVE
Director
$387,597
@ $1336.54 · 2025-07-01
NEUMANN SPENCER ADAM
Chief Financial Officer
$3.40M
@ $1307.22 · 2025-07-01
KARBOWSKI JEFFREY WILLIAM
Officer
$797,841
@ $1286.84 · 2025-06-25
KILGORE LESLIE JEAN
Director
$273,480
@ $1290.00 · 2025-06-25
KILGORE LESLIE JEAN
Director
$546,290
@ $1267.49 · 2025-06-24
MATHER ANN
Director
$1.36M
@ $1250.00 · 2025-06-05
KILGORE LESLIE JEAN
Director
$816,070
@ $1251.64 · 2025-06-05
KILGORE LESLIE JEAN
Director
$273,175
@ $1225.00 · 2025-06-03
HASTINGS REED
Director
$32.63M
@ $1211.66 · 2025-06-02
NEUMANN SPENCER ADAM
Chief Financial Officer
$3.15M
@ $1211.67 · 2025-06-02
KARBOWSKI JEFFREY WILLIAM
Officer
$764,653
@ $1194.77 · 2025-05-27
KILGORE LESLIE JEAN
Director
$545,210
@ $1172.49 · 2025-05-15
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
Director
$4.41M
@ $1124.26 · 2025-05-12
MASIYIWA STRIVE
Director
$1.13M
@ $1124.26 · 2025-05-12
MATHER ANN
Director
$1.56M
@ $1150.00 · 2025-05-09
WILLEMS CLETUS R
Officer
$339,124
@ $1138.00 · 2025-05-07
HYMAN DAVID A
Officer
$485,817
@ $1143.10 · 2025-05-06
PETERS GREGORY K.
Chief Executive Officer
$2.31M
@ $1141.51 · 2025-05-06
SARANDOS THEODORE ANTHONY JR.
Chief Executive Officer
$2.31M
@ $1140.25 · 2025-05-06
NEUMANN SPENCER ADAM
Chief Financial Officer
$782,915
@ $1141.28 · 2025-05-06
KILGORE LESLIE JEAN
Director
$271,400
@ $1150.00 · 2025-05-02
HASTINGS REED
Director
$30.57M
@ $1133.05 · 2025-05-01
NEUMANN SPENCER ADAM
Chief Financial Officer
$2.95M
@ $1132.38 · 2025-05-01
DOPFNER MATHIAS
Director
$6.69M
@ $1112.65 · 2025-04-30
KARBOWSKI JEFFREY WILLIAM
Officer
$702,106
@ $1097.04 · 2025-04-25
KILGORE LESLIE JEAN
Director
$848,491
@ $1047.52 · 2025-04-23
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
HON
FearGreed
😏Greed(66/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
NFLX
FearGreed
😨Fear(34/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
HON
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (66)
NFLX
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (34)
View HON Full AnalysisView NFLX Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: HON vs NFLX

Is Honeywell International Inc. or Netflix, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, HON trades at a 62.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $653 vs. price $243), compared to NFLX's 43.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $127 vs. $72).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Honeywell International Inc. or Netflix, Inc.?

NFLX scores 85/100 (Wide moat), while HON scores 85/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Honeywell International Inc. in financial distress?

HON's Altman Z-Score of 2.5 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. NFLX scores 10.9 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Honeywell International Inc. or Netflix, Inc.?

Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) generates a 8.5% free cash flow yield, compared to Honeywell International Inc.'s 7.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Honeywell International Inc. or Netflix, Inc.?

NFLX earns 27.3% ROIC versus HON's 11.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

HON vs NFLX: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io