Compare Stocks › HII vs TSLA
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (HII) vs Tesla, Inc. (TSLA)
HII
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.
$418.42
VS
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
$380.30
Rewards
HII
- ★Free cash flow has grown at a 18.1% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
- ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.40 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
- ★PEG ratio of 0.97 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
TSLA
- ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $50.04 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
- ★Altman Z-Score of 19.94 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
- ★Net debt/EBITDA of -2.8x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
Risks
HII
- ⚠Gross margin of 12.7% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
- ⚠Trailing P/E of 27.2x is 63% above the historical average of 16.7x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
- ⚠5 insider sales totaling $7.4M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
TSLA
- ⚠ROIC has declined by 17.7 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
- ⚠Gross margin of 18.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
- ⚠Share count has increased by 19% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
Key Valuation Metrics
Learn more →HII
TSLA
Valuation
$686.00M
Free Cash Flow
$6.22B
4.18%
FCF Yield
0.44%
27.17
Trailing P/E
358.77
20.60
Forward P/E
135.32
Quality & Moat
7.26%
ROIC
3.61%
11.93%
ROE
4.58%
12.70%
Gross Margin
18.03%
0.97
PEG Ratio
N/A
Balance Sheet Safety
0.59
Debt / Equity
0.18
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.95
Net Debt / EBITDA
-2.79
1.32%
Dividend Yield
N/A
HII: 5Ties: 1TSLA: 4
HIITSLA
Historical Fundamentals
Learn more →HII
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
TSLA
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
$1 Retained Earnings Test
Learn more →HII
$3.40
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.22B
Δ Market Cap
+$4.14B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TSLA
$50.04
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$25.92B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.30T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis
Learn more →HII
18.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 18.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $418.42
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
Fair Value: $513.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TSLA
367.6% Overvalued
Price is 367.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $380.30
Strongly undervalued
Strongly overvalued
Fair Value: $81.33
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth
Learn more →HII
What growth rate is the market pricing in at $418?
+13.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +11.9%
The market implies +13.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.
Standard FCF implies a demanding +11.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.
TSLA
What growth rate is the market pricing in at $380?
+49.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +41.8%
The market implies +49.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.
Standard FCF implies a demanding +41.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.
Economic Moat Score
Learn more →HII
57/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None
Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.
Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TSLA
31/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None
No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.
Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
Forensic Accounting
Learn more →HII
-2.12
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
M-Score Trend
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TSLA
-2.86
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
M-Score Trend
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
Ownership Breakdown
Learn more →HII
Insiders 0.8%Institutions 96.3%Retail & Other 2.9%
No. of Institutional Holders1,070
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TSLA
Insiders 11.1%Institutions 44.6%Retail & Other 44.3%
No. of Institutional Holders5,299
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
Insider Buying Activity
Learn more →HII
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $954,730
STANAGE NICKIE LEE
Director
$954,730
@ $272.78 · 2025-08-29
DONALD KIRKLAND H
Director
$99,832
@ $173.62 · 2025-02-27
WELCH JOHN K
Director
$174,924
@ $174.92 · 2025-02-26
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TSLA
0
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.00B
MUSK ELON REEVE
Chief Executive Officer
$999.96M
@ $389.28 · 2025-09-12
GEBBIA JOSEPH
Director
$1.03M
@ $256.31 · 2025-04-24
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.
Insider Selling Activity
Learn more →HII
5
Sells (3M)
14
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.93M
STIEHLE THOMAS E.
Chief Financial Officer
$1.94M
@ $430.54 · 2026-03-06
BOUDREAUX CHAD N.
Officer
$1.86M
@ $422.45 · 2026-03-05
CHEWNING ERIC D
Officer
$736,848
@ $433.44 · 2026-03-04
SCHUCK NICOLAS GERARD
Officer
$786,711
@ $457.39 · 2026-03-02
GREEN EDGAR ANDY III
Officer
$2.04M
@ $457.83 · 2026-03-02
BOUDREAUX CHAD N.
Officer
$247,216
@ $314.52 · 2025-11-26
HUGHES EDMOND E. JR.
Officer
$268,124
@ $315.44 · 2025-11-20
HARKER VICTORIA D
Director
$316,605
@ $316.61 · 2025-11-04
SCHUCK NICOLAS GERARD
Officer
$146,389
@ $314.82 · 2025-11-04
HARKER VICTORIA D
Director
$268,630
@ $268.63 · 2025-08-05
GREEN EDGAR ANDY III
Officer
$1.12M
@ $265.67 · 2025-08-04
BOUDREAUX CHAD N.
Officer
$449,873
@ $228.94 · 2025-06-03
HUGHES EDMOND E. JR.
Officer
$301,483
@ $231.91 · 2025-05-07
KELLY ANASTASI D
Director
$455,857
@ $232.58 · 2025-05-06
SCHUCK NICOLAS GERARD
Officer
$142,166
@ $189.55 · 2025-03-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TSLA
2
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $319.71M
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$899,077
@ $397.12 · 2026-03-06
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$10.69M
@ $415.56 · 2026-02-25
MUSK KIMBAL J
Director
$25.61M
@ $450.66 · 2025-12-09
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.17M
@ $443.93 · 2025-12-08
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$918,137
@ $352.45 · 2025-09-08
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.77M
@ $295.26 · 2025-07-08
ZHU XIAOTONG
Officer
$4.86M
@ $323.81 · 2025-06-12
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$732,573
@ $285.71 · 2025-06-09
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.40M
@ $342.30 · 2025-06-03
EHRENPREIS IRA MATTHEW
Director
$170.64M
@ $357.30 · 2025-05-27
MUSK KIMBAL J
Director
$32.73M
@ $357.39 · 2025-05-27
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.05M
@ $350.11 · 2025-05-16
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.20M
@ $300.00 · 2025-05-09
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$30.81M
@ $274.12 · 2025-05-06
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.14M
@ $284.40 · 2025-05-01
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$32.10M
@ $285.58 · 2025-04-29
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.00M
@ $250.00 · 2025-04-07
MURDOCH JAMES RUPERT
Director
$13.19M
@ $240.79 · 2025-03-10
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$718,111
@ $268.75 · 2025-03-06
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$33.67M
@ $299.61 · 2025-03-03
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.78M
@ $296.02 · 2025-03-03
MUSK KIMBAL J
Director
$27.59M
@ $367.87 · 2025-02-06
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$43.16M
@ $384.04 · 2025-02-03
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.68M
@ $383.11 · 2025-02-03
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.89M
@ $413.56 · 2025-01-06
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$41.16M
@ $411.63 · 2025-01-06
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$975,015
@ $374.29 · 2024-12-06
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$35.25M
@ $352.54 · 2024-12-04
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$39.79M
@ $354.06 · 2024-12-02
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.48M
@ $354.43 · 2024-12-02
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$35.34M
@ $314.44 · 2024-11-15
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$3.80M
@ $316.91 · 2024-11-11
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$34.60M
@ $346.02 · 2024-11-11
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.01M
@ $251.76 · 2024-11-01
MUSK KIMBAL J
Director
$15.14M
@ $250.23 · 2024-11-01
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.00M
@ $250.00 · 2024-10-24
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.00M
@ $250.00 · 2024-09-23
ZHU XIAOTONG
Officer
$65,867
@ $221.77 · 2024-09-06
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$14.60M
@ $219.96 · 2024-07-25
ZHU XIAOTONG
Officer
$113,151
@ $174.35 · 2024-06-06
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$17.32M
@ $184.86 · 2024-05-06
BAGLINO ANDREW D
Officer
$1.85M
@ $176.20 · 2024-04-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.
🎭 Mr. Market's Mood
Learn more →HII
😐Neutral(51/100)
"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"
Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TSLA
😐Neutral(47/100)
"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"
Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
⚖️ Buffett Signal
Learn more →HII
⚪Awaiting DCF Data
The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.
DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (51)
TSLA
⚪Awaiting DCF Data
The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.
DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)