Compare StocksHIG vs MS

The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc. (HIG) vs Morgan Stanley (MS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-21, HIG is undervalued at $128, with a DCF intrinsic value of $365 and a margin of safety of 65%. MS is undervalued at $223, with an intrinsic value of $298 and a margin of safety of 25%. Of the two, HIG has the wider margin of safety.

HIG
The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.
$128.25
VS
MS
Morgan Stanley
$223.17

Rewards

HIG
  • The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc. scores 97/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 14.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Share count has been reduced by 12% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
MS
  • Gross margin of 87.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Morgan Stanley scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.56 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

HIG
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.07 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • 13 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
MS
  • Trailing P/E of 20.2x is 26% above the historical average of 16.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 2.68 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.29 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
HIG
MS
Valuation
$5.60B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
15.94%
FCF Yield
N/A
9.03
Trailing P/E
20.20
9.07
Forward P/E
17.56
Quality & Moat
14.96%
ROIC
3.38%
22.74%
ROE
16.39%
38.17%
Gross Margin
87.39%
0.12
PEG Ratio
2.68
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.00
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
1.87%
Dividend Yield
1.79%
HIG: 5Ties: 2MS: 2
HIGMS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
HIG

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

MS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
HIG
$1.85
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$7.71B
Δ Market Cap
+$14.27B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MS
$6.65
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$20.84B
Δ Market Cap
+$138.59B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
HIG
64.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 64.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $128.25
Fair Value: $365.14
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MS
25.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 25.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $223.17
Fair Value: $297.53
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
HIG

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $128?

-3.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -8.6%

The market implies -3.9% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -8.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

MS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
HIG
97/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
MS
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
HIG
-2.55
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MS
-2.09
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
HIG
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 96.0%Retail & Other 3.6%
No. of Institutional Holders1,644
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MS
Insiders 24.3%Institutions 62.8%Retail & Other 12.9%
No. of Institutional Holders3,209
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
HIG
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MS
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $5,630
PETERSON DOUGLAS L
Director
$5,630
@ $156.39 · 2025-10-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
HIG
1
Sells (3M)
13
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $62.73M
TOOKER ADIN M
President
$1.20M
@ $135.13 · 2026-05-27
RODDEN LORI A
Officer
$5.62M
@ $138.05 · 2026-03-10
NIDERNO ALLISON G
Officer
$98,583
@ $140.63 · 2026-03-04
NIDERNO ALLISON G
Officer
$53,226
@ $142.32 · 2026-02-26
TOOKER ADIN M
President
$1.17M
@ $140.54 · 2026-02-25
RODDEN LORI A
Officer
$805,723
@ $141.83 · 2026-02-11
SWIFT CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Executive Officer
$14.21M
@ $140.78 · 2026-02-04
SWIFT CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Executive Officer
$27.55M
@ $136.41 · 2026-02-02
COSTELLO BETH ANN
Chief Financial Officer
$4.83M
@ $136.58 · 2026-01-02
TOOKER ADIN M
President
$928,205
@ $137.90 · 2025-11-26
RODDEN LORI A
Officer
$959,829
@ $122.41 · 2025-10-29
COSTELLO BETH ANN
Chief Financial Officer
$4.36M
@ $123.50 · 2025-08-04
RODDEN LORI A
Officer
$949,212
@ $123.11 · 2025-08-01
SWIFT CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Executive Officer
$12.84M
@ $130.84 · 2025-05-16
PAIANO ROBERT W
Officer
$1.16M
@ $128.05 · 2025-05-15
TOOKER ADIN M
President
$2.82M
@ $128.61 · 2025-05-15
STEPNOWSKI AMY M.
Officer
$6.88M
@ $125.89 · 2025-05-05
SWIFT CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Executive Officer
$12.15M
@ $125.50 · 2025-05-02
NIDERNO ALLISON G
Officer
$129,664
@ $119.51 · 2025-04-28
SWIFT CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Executive Officer
$168,001
@ $125.00 · 2025-04-03
SWIFT CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Executive Officer
$11.81M
@ $120.39 · 2025-03-17
PAIANO ROBERT W
Officer
$1.54M
@ $117.20 · 2025-03-11
SWIFT CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Executive Officer
$12,000
@ $120.00 · 2025-03-04
TOOKER ADIN M
President
$1.53M
@ $112.60 · 2025-02-18
TOOKER ADIN M
Officer
$803,479
@ $117.04 · 2024-11-15
SONI DEEPA
Officer
$2.24M
@ $110.96 · 2024-11-05
PAIANO ROBERT W
Officer
$1.46M
@ $110.95 · 2024-07-31
RODDEN LORI A
Officer
$428,522
@ $111.16 · 2024-07-31
FISHER MICHAEL R
Officer
$414,809
@ $101.47 · 2024-07-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MS
4
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $70.42M
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$2.12M
@ $190.75 · 2026-04-20
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$2.78M
@ $189.24 · 2026-04-17
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$3.04M
@ $188.22 · 2026-04-16
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$9.74M
@ $188.59 · 2026-04-16
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$6.02M
@ $182.61 · 2026-01-30
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.44M
@ $183.45 · 2026-01-20
YESHAYA SHARON
Chief Financial Officer
$2.94M
@ $185.77 · 2026-01-20
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$1.55M
@ $182.08 · 2026-01-20
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$3.97M
@ $184.00 · 2026-01-20
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$3.69M
@ $184.55 · 2026-01-20
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$5.57M
@ $183.62 · 2026-01-20
PICK EDWARD N.
Chief Executive Officer
$16.43M
@ $164.34 · 2025-10-31
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.09M
@ $141.13 · 2025-07-17
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$2.81M
@ $140.30 · 2025-07-17
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.69M
@ $141.12 · 2025-07-17
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.53M
@ $140.62 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$3.70M
@ $127.37 · 2025-05-12
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$95,459
@ $119.32 · 2025-05-02
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.80M
@ $120.00 · 2025-05-02
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.12M
@ $111.65 · 2025-04-15
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.15M
@ $138.06 · 2025-01-22
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$5.00M
@ $136.61 · 2025-01-21
AKRAM RAJA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.38M
@ $136.01 · 2025-01-21
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.78M
@ $136.20 · 2025-01-21
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.52M
@ $136.92 · 2025-01-21
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.20M
@ $136.43 · 2025-01-21
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$368,375
@ $105.25 · 2024-07-26
AKRAM RAJA
Officer
$797,764
@ $106.37 · 2024-07-18
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.26M
@ $106.54 · 2024-07-17
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$106,621
@ $106.62 · 2024-07-17
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
HIG
FearGreed
😐Neutral(55/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MS
FearGreed
😏Greed(70/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
HIG
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (55)
MS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (70)
View HIG Full AnalysisView MS Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: HIG vs MS

Is The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc. or Morgan Stanley more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, HIG trades at a 64.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $365 vs. price $128), compared to MS's 25.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $298 vs. $223).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc. or Morgan Stanley?

HIG scores 97/100 (Wide moat), while MS scores 80/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Morgan Stanley in financial distress?

MS's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. HIG scores 1.1 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc. or Morgan Stanley?

HIG earns 15.0% ROIC versus MS's 3.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.'s or Morgan Stanley's?

HIG's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to MS's 79/100 (Safe). HIG has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

HIG vs MS: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io