Compare StocksHD vs VZ

Home Depot, Inc. (The) (HD) vs Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, HD is undervalued at $332, with a DCF intrinsic value of $248851992757 and a margin of safety of 100%. VZ is overvalued at $47, with an intrinsic value of $33 and a margin of safety of -43%. Of the two, HD has the wider margin of safety.

HD
Home Depot, Inc. (The)
$331.96
VS
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
$46.81

Rewards

HD
  • Home Depot, Inc. (The) has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Home Depot, Inc. (The) scores 87/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
VZ
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 23.7% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • FCF yield of 8.9% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
  • PEG ratio of 0.89 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

HD
  • High leverage (4.48x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • 11 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
VZ
  • High leverage (1.82x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.24 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Insiders have sold $3.5M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
HD
VZ
Valuation
$10.13B
Free Cash Flow
$17.47B
N/A
FCF Yield
8.94%
23.58
Trailing P/E
12.19
20.63
Forward P/E
8.88
Quality & Moat
20.22%
ROIC
8.44%
128.38%
ROE
15.84%
33.13%
Gross Margin
59.45%
1.87
PEG Ratio
0.89
Balance Sheet Safety
4.48
Net Debt / Equity
1.82
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.49
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.76
2.81%
Dividend Yield
6.05%
HD: 3Ties: 1VZ: 7
HDVZ

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
HD

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

VZ

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
HD
$-0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$17.64B
Δ Market Cap
$-14.59
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
VZ
$0.50
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Mediocre Allocator
Σ Retained
$12.54B
Δ Market Cap
+$6.29B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
HD
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $331.96
Fair Value: $248851992757.04
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
VZ
42.9% Overvalued
Price is 42.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $46.81
Fair Value: $32.76
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
HD

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $332?

-14.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -9.0%

The market implies -14.7% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -9.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

VZ

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $47?

+8.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.1%

The market implies +8.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
HD
87/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
VZ
55/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
HD
-2.40
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
VZ
-2.69
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
HD
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 75.9%Retail & Other 24.1%
No. of Institutional Holders5,059
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
VZ
Insiders 0.0%Institutions 70.7%Retail & Other 29.2%
No. of Institutional Holders3,969
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
HD
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
BRENNEMAN GREGORY D
Director
$999,767
@ $346.66 · 2025-03-14
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
VZ
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
HD
0
Sells (3M)
11
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $23.56M
MCPHAIL RICHARD V
Chief Financial Officer
$940,670
@ $368.89 · 2026-03-04
DEATON JOHN A.
Officer
$661,617
@ $369.00 · 2026-03-04
ROSEBOROUGH TERESA WYNN
General Counsel
$1.00M
@ $348.52 · 2025-12-26
BROWN ANGIE
Chief Technology Officer
$695,948
@ $357.63 · 2025-12-12
BASTEK WILLIAM D
Officer
$974,445
@ $423.12 · 2025-09-12
BASTEK WILLIAM D
Officer
$1.55M
@ $410.23 · 2025-08-22
ROSEBOROUGH TERESA WYNN
General Counsel
$2.27M
@ $413.23 · 2025-08-22
DECKER EDWARD P.
Chief Executive Officer
$13.07M
@ $397.22 · 2025-08-21
BROWN ANGIE
Chief Technology Officer
$404,070
@ $404.07 · 2025-08-20
MCPHAIL RICHARD V
Chief Financial Officer
$1.36M
@ $403.66 · 2025-08-20
PADILLA HECTOR A
Officer
$640,609
@ $404.17 · 2025-08-20
DEATON JOHN A.
Officer
$3.29M
@ $369.99 · 2025-06-03
ROSEBOROUGH TERESA WYNN
General Counsel
$2.00M
@ $369.28 · 2025-05-28
SIDDIQUI FAHIM
Chief Technology Officer
$954,564
@ $367.14 · 2025-05-22
BASTEK WILLIAM D
Officer
$1.24M
@ $416.61 · 2024-11-22
HOURIGAN TIMOTHY A
Officer
$6.55M
@ $409.52 · 2024-11-18
PADILLA HECTOR A
Officer
$1.48M
@ $408.96 · 2024-11-14
CAMPBELL ANN-MARIE
Officer
$12.24M
@ $408.40 · 2024-11-14
ROSEBOROUGH TERESA WYNN
General Counsel
$9.03M
@ $408.91 · 2024-11-14
MCPHAIL RICHARD V
Chief Financial Officer
$2.65M
@ $408.45 · 2024-11-13
SCARDINO KIMBERLY R.
Officer
$617,100
@ $363.00 · 2024-08-19
ROSEBOROUGH TERESA WYNN
General Counsel
$1.87M
@ $359.32 · 2024-08-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
VZ
1
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $4.35M
HAMMOCK SAMANTHA
Officer
$3.50M
@ $47.83 · 2026-05-29
STILLWELL MARY-LEE
Officer
$428,450
@ $50.00 · 2026-03-02
RUSSO JOSEPH J.
Officer
$429,906
@ $44.88 · 2026-02-02
MALADY KYLE
Officer
$438,101
@ $43.81 · 2025-05-08
MALADY KYLE
Officer
$396,900
@ $44.10 · 2025-05-07
MALADY KYLE
Officer
$329,062
@ $43.87 · 2025-04-30
MALADY KYLE
Officer
$430,240
@ $43.02 · 2025-04-24
MALADY KYLE
Officer
$212,425
@ $42.48 · 2025-04-23
VENKATESH VANDANA
Officer
$437,939
@ $43.79 · 2025-02-25
MALADY KYLE
Officer
$261,623
@ $39.70 · 2025-02-04
MALADY KYLE
Officer
$319,080
@ $39.88 · 2025-02-03
MALADY KYLE
Chief Executive Officer
$453,155
@ $40.88 · 2025-01-29
MALADY KYLE
Officer
$809,800
@ $40.49 · 2025-01-28
MALADY KYLE
Officer
$810,800
@ $40.54 · 2025-01-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
HD
FearGreed
😐Neutral(46/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
VZ
FearGreed
😏Greed(61/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
HD
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (46)
VZ
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
View HD Full AnalysisView VZ Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: HD vs VZ

Is Home Depot, Inc. (The) or Verizon Communications Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, HD trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $248851992757 vs. price $332), compared to VZ's -42.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $33 vs. $47).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Home Depot, Inc. (The) or Verizon Communications Inc.?

HD scores 87/100 (Wide moat), while VZ scores 55/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Verizon Communications Inc. in financial distress?

VZ's Altman Z-Score of 1.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. HD scores 3.5 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Home Depot, Inc. (The) or Verizon Communications Inc.?

HD earns 20.2% ROIC versus VZ's 8.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Home Depot, Inc. (The)'s or Verizon Communications Inc.'s?

VZ's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to HD's 69/100 (Safe). VZ has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

HD vs VZ: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io