Compare StocksHD vs INTC

Home Depot, Inc. (The) (HD) vs Intel Corporation (INTC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, HD is undervalued at $334, with a DCF intrinsic value of $248851992757 and a margin of safety of 100%. INTC is overvalued at $91, with an intrinsic value of $7 and a margin of safety of -1279%. Of the two, HD has the wider margin of safety.

HD
Home Depot, Inc. (The)
$334.10
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$90.73

Rewards

HD
  • Home Depot, Inc. (The) has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Home Depot, Inc. (The) scores 87/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
INTC

    Risks

    HD
    • High leverage (4.48x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • 11 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    • FCF yield of 1.1% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    HD
    INTC
    Valuation
    $10.13B
    Free Cash Flow
    $4.87B
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    1.06%
    23.73
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    20.76
    Forward P/E
    44.53
    Quality & Moat
    20.22%
    ROIC
    3.57%
    128.38%
    ROE
    -10.71%
    33.13%
    Gross Margin
    38.87%
    1.87
    PEG Ratio
    1.36
    Balance Sheet Safety
    4.48
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.20
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    2.49
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.24
    2.81%
    Dividend Yield
    0.00%
    HD: 5Ties: 1INTC: 4
    HDINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    HD

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    HD
    $-0.00
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $17.64B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-11.23
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    HD
    100.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $334.10
    Fair Value: $248851992757.04
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $90.73
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    HD

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $334?

    -14.7%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -9.0%

    The market implies -14.7% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -9.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    INTC

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $91?

    +29.7%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    HD
    87/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    HD
    -2.40
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.83
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    HD
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 75.9%Retail & Other 24.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders5,059
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 14.7%Institutions 63.9%Retail & Other 21.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,881
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    HD
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    BRENNEMAN GREGORY D
    Director
    $999,767
    @ $346.66 · 2025-03-14
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    HD
    0
    Sells (3M)
    11
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $23.56M
    MCPHAIL RICHARD V
    Chief Financial Officer
    $940,670
    @ $368.89 · 2026-03-04
    DEATON JOHN A.
    Officer
    $661,617
    @ $369.00 · 2026-03-04
    ROSEBOROUGH TERESA WYNN
    General Counsel
    $1.00M
    @ $348.52 · 2025-12-26
    BROWN ANGIE
    Chief Technology Officer
    $695,948
    @ $357.63 · 2025-12-12
    BASTEK WILLIAM D
    Officer
    $974,445
    @ $423.12 · 2025-09-12
    BASTEK WILLIAM D
    Officer
    $1.55M
    @ $410.23 · 2025-08-22
    ROSEBOROUGH TERESA WYNN
    General Counsel
    $2.27M
    @ $413.23 · 2025-08-22
    DECKER EDWARD P.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $13.07M
    @ $397.22 · 2025-08-21
    BROWN ANGIE
    Chief Technology Officer
    $404,070
    @ $404.07 · 2025-08-20
    MCPHAIL RICHARD V
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.36M
    @ $403.66 · 2025-08-20
    PADILLA HECTOR A
    Officer
    $640,609
    @ $404.17 · 2025-08-20
    DEATON JOHN A.
    Officer
    $3.29M
    @ $369.99 · 2025-06-03
    ROSEBOROUGH TERESA WYNN
    General Counsel
    $2.00M
    @ $369.28 · 2025-05-28
    SIDDIQUI FAHIM
    Chief Technology Officer
    $954,564
    @ $367.14 · 2025-05-22
    BASTEK WILLIAM D
    Officer
    $1.24M
    @ $416.61 · 2024-11-22
    HOURIGAN TIMOTHY A
    Officer
    $6.55M
    @ $409.52 · 2024-11-18
    PADILLA HECTOR A
    Officer
    $1.48M
    @ $408.96 · 2024-11-14
    ROSEBOROUGH TERESA WYNN
    General Counsel
    $9.03M
    @ $408.91 · 2024-11-14
    CAMPBELL ANN-MARIE
    Officer
    $12.24M
    @ $408.40 · 2024-11-14
    MCPHAIL RICHARD V
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.65M
    @ $408.45 · 2024-11-13
    SCARDINO KIMBERLY R.
    Officer
    $617,100
    @ $363.00 · 2024-08-19
    ROSEBOROUGH TERESA WYNN
    General Counsel
    $1.87M
    @ $359.32 · 2024-08-15
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.47M
    CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $4.01M
    @ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    HD
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(47/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(38/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    HD
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (38)
    View HD Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: HD vs INTC

    Is Home Depot, Inc. (The) or Intel Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, HD trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $248851992757 vs. price $334), compared to INTC's -1278.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $7 vs. $91).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Home Depot, Inc. (The) or Intel Corporation?

    HD scores 87/100 (Wide moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Intel Corporation in financial distress?

    INTC's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. HD scores 3.5 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Home Depot, Inc. (The) or Intel Corporation?

    HD earns 20.2% ROIC versus INTC's 3.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.