Compare Stocks › HAS vs TXN

Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) vs Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, HAS is overvalued at $119, with a DCF intrinsic value of $71 and a margin of safety of -68%. TXN is undervalued at $301, with an intrinsic value of $391 and a margin of safety of 23%. Of the two, TXN has the wider margin of safety.

HAS
Hasbro, Inc.
$119.09
VS
TXN
Texas Instruments Incorporated
$300.84

Rewards

HAS
  • ★Gross margin of 65.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 51.8% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
TXN
  • ★Texas Instruments Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 60.2% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

HAS
  • ⚠High leverage (2.58x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • ⚠Insiders have sold $2.9M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
TXN
  • ⚠Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 1.7% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 39.0x is 44% above the historical average of 27.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
HAS
TXN
Valuation
$804.50M
Free Cash Flow
$4.78B
4.83%
FCF Yield
1.74%
17.75
Trailing P/E
39.02
17.07
Forward P/E
26.11
Quality & Moat
27.72%
ROIC
23.82%
139.78%
ROE
39.72%
65.34%
Gross Margin
60.24%
1.71
PEG Ratio
0.91
Balance Sheet Safety
2.58
Net Debt / Equity
0.28
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.56
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.51
2.35%
Dividend Yield
2.02%
HAS: 7Ties: 1TXN: 4
HASTXN

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
HAS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TXN

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
HAS
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-2.60B
Δ Market Cap
+$3.08B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TXN
$3.91
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.96B
Δ Market Cap
+$7.67B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
HAS
68.4% Overvalued
Price is 68.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $119.09
Fair Value: $70.73
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TXN
11.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 11.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $300.84
Fair Value: $339.26
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
HAS

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $119?

+10.0%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market below historical growth — potential opportunity.

TXN

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $301?

+21.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +22.4%

The market implies +21.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +22.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
HAS
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
TXN
48/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
HAS

Insufficient data for Beneish M-Score calculation (requires 2+ years).

TXN
-2.67
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
HAS
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 101.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,061
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TXN
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 91.9%Retail & Other 7.9%
No. of Institutional Holders3,691
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
HAS
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TXN
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
HAS
4
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $50.16M
BARBACOVI HOLLY
Officer
$476,369
@ $94.20 · 2026-08-31
HIGHT JOHN
Officer
$1.10M
@ $94.63 · 2026-08-19
HIGHT JOHN
Officer
$1.08M
@ $96.29 · 2026-08-17
HAMREN ELIZABETH
Director
$272,784
@ $92.03 · 2026-08-07
GOETTER GINA M
Chief Financial Officer
$776,602
@ $93.96 · 2026-07-31
HIGHT JOHN
Officer
$298,551
@ $93.71 · 2026-07-30
GOETTER GINA M
Chief Financial Officer
$1.05M
@ $95.44 · 2026-07-28
KILPIN TIMOTHY J
Officer
$1.86M
@ $93.12 · 2026-07-28
COCKS CHRISTIAN P
Chief Executive Officer
$19.71M
@ $100.33 · 2026-02-26
BARBACOVI HOLLY
Officer
$437,929
@ $100.98 · 2026-02-20
KILPIN TIMOTHY J
Officer
$800,619
@ $103.00 · 2026-02-13
SIBLEY TARRANT LIVINGSTON III
Officer
$1.59M
@ $104.98 · 2026-02-12
GOETTER GINA M
Chief Financial Officer
$1.29M
@ $103.46 · 2026-02-12
COCKS CHRISTIAN P
Chief Executive Officer
$18.86M
@ $103.86 · 2026-02-12
BUNGE JASON M
Officer
$252,342
@ $106.03 · 2026-02-12
COCHRAN HOPE F
Director
$308,972
@ $77.24 · 2025-11-10
THOMSON ROBERTA KELLY
Officer
$202,825
@ $81.13 · 2025-08-28
KILPIN TIMOTHY J
Officer
$696,882
@ $81.44 · 2025-08-27
COCKS CHRISTIAN P
Chief Executive Officer
$2.19M
@ $78.92 · 2025-08-21
THOMSON ROBERTA KELLY
Officer
$79,971
@ $79.81 · 2025-08-14
AUSTIN MATTHEW EDWARD
Officer
$111,782
@ $65.07 · 2024-11-29
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TXN
4
Sells (3M)
31
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $119.37M
SANCHEZ ROBERT E
Director
$1.83M
@ $302.21 · 2026-10-27
PATSLEY PAMELA H
Director
$1.37M
@ $301.56 · 2026-10-27
CLARK JANET F
Director
$1.30M
@ $302.46 · 2026-10-27
ABRAHAM TSEDENIYA
Officer
$1.85M
@ $264.63 · 2026-08-27
CRAIGHEAD MARTIN S
Director
$3.20M
@ $320.43 · 2026-05-28
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$1.55M
@ $309.13 · 2026-05-14
LIZARDI RAFAEL R
Chief Financial Officer
$14.71M
@ $308.10 · 2026-05-14
COX CARRIE SMITH
Director
$2.71M
@ $306.41 · 2026-05-13
LEONARD SHANON J
Officer
$1.47M
@ $295.22 · 2026-05-11
ILAN HAVIV
Chief Executive Officer
$5.61M
@ $280.32 · 2026-05-04
KNECHT JULIE C.
Officer
$2.77M
@ $278.70 · 2026-05-01
GARY MARK
Officer
$3.82M
@ $279.25 · 2026-04-30
ROBERTS MARK T
Officer
$7.87M
@ $280.34 · 2026-04-30
YUNUS MOHAMMAD
Officer
$13.82M
@ $270.44 · 2026-04-29
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$982,359
@ $268.40 · 2026-04-27
KANE KATHARINE
General Counsel
$1.66M
@ $270.41 · 2026-04-27
BLUEDORN TODD M
Director
$1.18M
@ $274.25 · 2026-04-24
RON AMICHAI
Officer
$5.00M
@ $272.43 · 2026-04-24
LIZARDI RAFAEL R
Chief Financial Officer
$11.12M
@ $274.23 · 2026-04-24
WITZSCHE CHRISTINE
Officer
$998,771
@ $275.52 · 2026-04-24
LEONARD SHANON J
Officer
$5.06M
@ $277.95 · 2026-04-24
PATSLEY PAMELA H
Director
$1.19M
@ $276.11 · 2026-04-24
KOZANIAN HAGOP H
Officer
$1.55M
@ $225.95 · 2026-02-17
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$1.50M
@ $230.79 · 2026-02-11
LIZARDI RAFAEL R
Chief Financial Officer
$15.88M
@ $221.73 · 2026-02-11
GARY MARK
Officer
$5.24M
@ $226.00 · 2026-02-11
ROBERTS MARK T
Officer
$986,604
@ $221.16 · 2026-02-09
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$670,387
@ $223.46 · 2026-02-05
BLINN MARK A
Director
$696,647
@ $221.58 · 2026-02-05
KIRK RONALD
Director
$1.62M
@ $162.33 · 2025-11-24
WITZSCHE CHRISTINE
Officer
$164,306
@ $164.31 · 2025-11-13
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$308,030
@ $205.35 · 2025-08-25
TEMPLETON RICHARD K
Chairman of the Board
$19.85M
@ $195.41 · 2025-02-28
TEMPLETON RICHARD K
Chairman of the Board
$38.65M
@ $199.20 · 2025-02-26
TEMPLETON RICHARD K
Chairman of the Board
$39.32M
@ $202.70 · 2025-02-24
CLARK JANET F
Director
$1.23M
@ $203.62 · 2025-02-24
BLINN MARK A
Director
$1.17M
@ $189.89 · 2025-02-19
LEONARD SHANON J
Officer
$401,241
@ $186.62 · 2025-02-18
BLINN MARK A
Director
$106,617
@ $180.71 · 2025-02-04
KIRK RONALD
Director
$2.14M
@ $203.33 · 2024-11-25
ILAN HAVIV
Chief Executive Officer
$2.88M
@ $219.30 · 2024-11-08
GARY MARK
Officer
$3.49M
@ $219.82 · 2024-11-08
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$472,514
@ $217.25 · 2024-11-07
LIZARDI RAFAEL R
Chief Financial Officer
$10.19M
@ $217.16 · 2024-11-07
YUNUS MOHAMMAD
Officer
$1.81M
@ $216.94 · 2024-11-07
ILAN HAVIV
Chief Executive Officer
$5.29M
@ $211.50 · 2024-11-06
GARY MARK
Officer
$940,296
@ $214.83 · 2024-11-06
WITZSCHE CHRISTINE
Officer
$27,941
@ $211.67 · 2024-11-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
HAS
FearGreed
😏Greed(69/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TXN
FearGreed
😏Greed(62/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
HAS
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (69)
TXN
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
View HAS Full AnalysisView TXN Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: HAS vs TXN

Is Hasbro, Inc. or Texas Instruments Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, TXN trades at a 23.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $391 vs. price $301), compared to HAS's -68.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $71 vs. $119).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Hasbro, Inc. or Texas Instruments Incorporated?▼

TXN scores 48/100 (Narrow moat), while HAS scores 40/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Hasbro, Inc. or Texas Instruments Incorporated?▼

Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) generates a 4.8% free cash flow yield, compared to Texas Instruments Incorporated's 1.7%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Hasbro, Inc. or Texas Instruments Incorporated?▼

HAS earns 27.7% ROIC versus TXN's 23.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Hasbro, Inc.'s or Texas Instruments Incorporated's?▼

HAS's dividend earns a safety score of 68/100 (Safe), compared to TXN's 34/100 (Unsafe). HAS has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

HAS vs TXN: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io