Compare StocksHAS vs TXN

Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) vs Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, HAS is overvalued at $89, with a DCF intrinsic value of $77 and a margin of safety of -16%. TXN is undervalued at $261, with an intrinsic value of $365 and a margin of safety of 28%. Of the two, TXN has the wider margin of safety.

HAS
Hasbro, Inc.
$88.81
VS
TXN
Texas Instruments Incorporated
$261.32

Rewards

HAS
  • Gross margin of 63.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 51.8% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
TXN
  • Texas Instruments Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
  • PEG ratio of 0.94 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

HAS
  • FCF yield of 5.5% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • High leverage (3.42x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • 8 insider sales totaling $6.9M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
TXN
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • FCF yield of 1.5% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 39.8x is 47% above the historical average of 27.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
HAS
TXN
Valuation
$688.15M
Free Cash Flow
$3.55B
5.49%
FCF Yield
1.49%
15.80
Trailing P/E
39.78
13.61
Forward P/E
24.55
Quality & Moat
18.89%
ROIC
20.41%
159.56%
ROE
35.18%
63.82%
Gross Margin
58.33%
1.65
PEG Ratio
0.94
Balance Sheet Safety
3.42
Net Debt / Equity
0.39
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.92
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.74
3.14%
Dividend Yield
2.18%
HAS: 6Ties: 1TXN: 5
HASTXN

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
HAS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TXN

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
HAS
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-2.60B
Δ Market Cap
+$3.08B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TXN
$3.91
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.96B
Δ Market Cap
+$7.67B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
HAS
16.0% Overvalued
Price is 16.0% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $88.81
Fair Value: $76.59
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TXN
17.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 17.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $261.32
Fair Value: $315.99
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
HAS

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $89?

+8.9%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market below historical growth — potential opportunity.

TXN

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $261?

+20.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +24.7%

The market implies +20.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +24.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
HAS
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
TXN
48/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
HAS

Insufficient data for Beneish M-Score calculation (requires 2+ years).

TXN
-2.67
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
HAS
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 100.9%
No. of Institutional Holders1,040
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TXN
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 91.7%Retail & Other 8.1%
No. of Institutional Holders3,671
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
HAS
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TXN
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
HAS
8
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $50.16M
BARBACOVI HOLLY
Officer
$476,369
@ $94.20 · 2026-08-31
HIGHT JOHN
Officer
$1.10M
@ $94.63 · 2026-08-19
HIGHT JOHN
Officer
$1.08M
@ $96.29 · 2026-08-17
HAMREN ELIZABETH
Director
$272,784
@ $92.03 · 2026-08-07
GOETTER GINA M
Chief Financial Officer
$776,602
@ $93.96 · 2026-07-31
HIGHT JOHN
Officer
$298,551
@ $93.71 · 2026-07-30
KILPIN TIMOTHY J
Officer
$1.86M
@ $93.12 · 2026-07-28
GOETTER GINA M
Chief Financial Officer
$1.05M
@ $95.44 · 2026-07-28
COCKS CHRISTIAN P
Chief Executive Officer
$19.71M
@ $100.33 · 2026-02-26
BARBACOVI HOLLY
Officer
$437,929
@ $100.98 · 2026-02-20
KILPIN TIMOTHY J
Officer
$800,619
@ $103.00 · 2026-02-13
BUNGE JASON M
Officer
$252,342
@ $106.03 · 2026-02-12
SIBLEY TARRANT LIVINGSTON III
Officer
$1.59M
@ $104.98 · 2026-02-12
GOETTER GINA M
Chief Financial Officer
$1.29M
@ $103.46 · 2026-02-12
COCKS CHRISTIAN P
Chief Executive Officer
$18.86M
@ $103.86 · 2026-02-12
COCHRAN HOPE F
Director
$308,972
@ $77.24 · 2025-11-10
THOMSON ROBERTA KELLY
Officer
$202,825
@ $81.13 · 2025-08-28
KILPIN TIMOTHY J
Officer
$696,882
@ $81.44 · 2025-08-27
COCKS CHRISTIAN P
Chief Executive Officer
$2.19M
@ $78.92 · 2025-08-21
THOMSON ROBERTA KELLY
Officer
$79,971
@ $79.81 · 2025-08-14
AUSTIN MATTHEW EDWARD
Officer
$111,782
@ $65.07 · 2024-11-29
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TXN
1
Sells (3M)
28
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $114.87M
ABRAHAM TSEDENIYA
Officer
$1.85M
@ $264.63 · 2026-08-27
CRAIGHEAD MARTIN S
Director
$3.20M
@ $320.43 · 2026-05-28
LIZARDI RAFAEL R
Chief Financial Officer
$14.71M
@ $308.10 · 2026-05-14
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$1.55M
@ $309.13 · 2026-05-14
COX CARRIE SMITH
Director
$2.71M
@ $306.41 · 2026-05-13
LEONARD SHANON J
Officer
$1.47M
@ $295.22 · 2026-05-11
ILAN HAVIV
Chief Executive Officer
$5.61M
@ $280.32 · 2026-05-04
KNECHT JULIE C.
Officer
$2.77M
@ $278.70 · 2026-05-01
GARY MARK
Officer
$3.82M
@ $279.25 · 2026-04-30
ROBERTS MARK T
Officer
$7.87M
@ $280.34 · 2026-04-30
YUNUS MOHAMMAD
Officer
$13.82M
@ $270.44 · 2026-04-29
KANE KATHARINE
General Counsel
$1.66M
@ $270.41 · 2026-04-27
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$982,359
@ $268.40 · 2026-04-27
RON AMICHAI
Officer
$5.00M
@ $272.43 · 2026-04-24
LIZARDI RAFAEL R
Chief Financial Officer
$11.12M
@ $274.23 · 2026-04-24
WITZSCHE CHRISTINE
Officer
$998,771
@ $275.52 · 2026-04-24
LEONARD SHANON J
Officer
$5.06M
@ $277.95 · 2026-04-24
PATSLEY PAMELA H
Director
$1.19M
@ $276.11 · 2026-04-24
BLUEDORN TODD M
Director
$1.18M
@ $274.25 · 2026-04-24
KOZANIAN HAGOP H
Officer
$1.55M
@ $225.95 · 2026-02-17
LIZARDI RAFAEL R
Chief Financial Officer
$15.88M
@ $221.73 · 2026-02-11
GARY MARK
Officer
$5.24M
@ $226.00 · 2026-02-11
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$1.50M
@ $230.79 · 2026-02-11
ROBERTS MARK T
Officer
$986,604
@ $221.16 · 2026-02-09
BLINN MARK A
Director
$696,647
@ $221.58 · 2026-02-05
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$670,387
@ $223.46 · 2026-02-05
KIRK RONALD
Director
$1.62M
@ $162.33 · 2025-11-24
WITZSCHE CHRISTINE
Officer
$164,306
@ $164.31 · 2025-11-13
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$308,030
@ $205.35 · 2025-08-25
TEMPLETON RICHARD K
Chairman of the Board
$19.85M
@ $195.41 · 2025-02-28
TEMPLETON RICHARD K
Chairman of the Board
$38.65M
@ $199.20 · 2025-02-26
TEMPLETON RICHARD K
Chairman of the Board
$39.32M
@ $202.70 · 2025-02-24
CLARK JANET F
Director
$1.23M
@ $203.62 · 2025-02-24
BLINN MARK A
Director
$1.17M
@ $189.89 · 2025-02-19
LEONARD SHANON J
Officer
$401,241
@ $186.62 · 2025-02-18
BLINN MARK A
Director
$106,617
@ $180.71 · 2025-02-04
KIRK RONALD
Director
$2.14M
@ $203.33 · 2024-11-25
ILAN HAVIV
Chief Executive Officer
$2.88M
@ $219.30 · 2024-11-08
GARY MARK
Officer
$3.49M
@ $219.82 · 2024-11-08
LIZARDI RAFAEL R
Chief Financial Officer
$10.19M
@ $217.16 · 2024-11-07
YUNUS MOHAMMAD
Officer
$1.81M
@ $216.94 · 2024-11-07
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$472,514
@ $217.25 · 2024-11-07
GARY MARK
Officer
$940,296
@ $214.83 · 2024-11-06
ILAN HAVIV
Chief Executive Officer
$5.29M
@ $211.50 · 2024-11-06
WITZSCHE CHRISTINE
Officer
$27,941
@ $211.67 · 2024-11-06
SANCHEZ ROBERT E
Director
$2.09M
@ $208.80 · 2024-10-25
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
HAS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(45/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TXN
FearGreed
😐Neutral(51/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
HAS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (45)
TXN
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (51)
View HAS Full AnalysisView TXN Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: HAS vs TXN

Is Hasbro, Inc. or Texas Instruments Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, TXN trades at a 28.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $365 vs. price $261), compared to HAS's -16.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $77 vs. $89).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Hasbro, Inc. or Texas Instruments Incorporated?

TXN scores 48/100 (Narrow moat), while HAS scores 40/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Hasbro, Inc. or Texas Instruments Incorporated?

Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) generates a 5.5% free cash flow yield, compared to Texas Instruments Incorporated's 1.5%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Hasbro, Inc. or Texas Instruments Incorporated?

TXN earns 20.4% ROIC versus HAS's 18.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Hasbro, Inc.'s or Texas Instruments Incorporated's?

HAS's dividend earns a safety score of 68/100 (Safe), compared to TXN's 34/100 (Unsafe). HAS has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

HAS vs TXN: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io