SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › HAS vs INTC

Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

HAS
Hasbro, Inc.
$91.36
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18

Rewards

HAS
  • ★Gross margin of 63.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 51.8% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
INTC

    Risks

    HAS
    • ⚠FCF yield of 5.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    • ⚠High leverage (6.01x debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • ⚠7 insider sales totaling $42.9M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
    INTC
    • ⚠Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    HAS
    INTC
    Valuation
    $694.90M
    Free Cash Flow
    $-4.50B
    5.41%
    FCF Yield
    -1.95%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    14.60
    Forward P/E
    46.59
    Quality & Moat
    19.38%
    ROIC
    1.24%
    -57.01%
    ROE
    -0.21%
    63.82%
    Gross Margin
    36.56%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    6.01
    Debt / Equity
    0.37
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    2.10
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.77
    3.06%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    HAS: 5Ties: 1INTC: 3
    HASINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    HAS

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    HAS
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-2.60B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$3.08B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    HAS
    9.4% Margin of Safety
    Price is 9.4% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $91.36
    Fair Value: $100.79
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    HAS

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $91?

    +9.1%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market below historical growth — potential opportunity.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    HAS
    40/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    HAS
    -3.45
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    HAS
    Insiders 0.9%Institutions 94.5%Retail & Other 4.7%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,042
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    HAS
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    HAS
    7
    Sells (3M)
    12
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $46.41M
    COCKS CHRISTIAN P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $19.71M
    @ $100.33 · 2026-02-26
    BARBACOVI HOLLY
    Officer
    $437,929
    @ $100.98 · 2026-02-20
    KILPIN TIMOTHY J
    Officer
    $800,619
    @ $103.00 · 2026-02-13
    SIBLEY TARRANT LIVINGSTON III
    Officer
    $1.59M
    @ $104.98 · 2026-02-12
    GOETTER GINA M
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.29M
    @ $103.46 · 2026-02-12
    COCKS CHRISTIAN P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $18.86M
    @ $103.86 · 2026-02-12
    BUNGE JASON M
    Officer
    $252,342
    @ $106.03 · 2026-02-12
    COCHRAN HOPE F
    Director
    $308,972
    @ $77.24 · 2025-11-10
    THOMSON ROBERTA KELLY
    Officer
    $202,825
    @ $81.13 · 2025-08-28
    KILPIN TIMOTHY J
    Officer
    $696,882
    @ $81.44 · 2025-08-27
    COCKS CHRISTIAN P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.19M
    @ $78.92 · 2025-08-21
    THOMSON ROBERTA KELLY
    Officer
    $79,971
    @ $79.81 · 2025-08-14
    AUSTIN MATTHEW EDWARD
    Officer
    $111,782
    @ $65.07 · 2024-11-29
    SIBLEY TARRANT LIVINGSTON III
    Officer
    $783,442
    @ $60.26 · 2024-05-29
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    HAS
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(46/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    HAS
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (46)
    INTC
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    View HAS Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis