Compare StocksHAL vs SLB

Halliburton Company (HAL) vs SLB N.V. (SLB): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, HAL is undervalued at $35, with a DCF intrinsic value of $110 and a margin of safety of 68%. SLB is undervalued at $48, with an intrinsic value of $176 and a margin of safety of 73%. Of the two, SLB has the wider margin of safety.

HAL
Halliburton Company
$34.93
VS
SLB
SLB N.V.
$48.09

Rewards

HAL
  • Halliburton Company has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 10.7% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.05 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.
SLB
  • SLB N.V. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • SLB N.V. scores 79/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

HAL
  • Gross margin of 15.3% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • FCF yield of 6.9% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • 5 insider sales totaling $16.0M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
SLB
  • Gross margin of 17.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.14 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 2 out of 3 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
HAL
SLB
Valuation
$2.03B
Free Cash Flow
$4.54B
6.95%
FCF Yield
6.32%
19.30
Trailing P/E
21.19
11.95
Forward P/E
14.38
Quality & Moat
11.64%
ROIC
8.94%
14.63%
ROE
14.07%
15.28%
Gross Margin
17.80%
0.97
PEG Ratio
1.82
Balance Sheet Safety
0.56
Net Debt / Equity
0.30
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.47
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.09
1.88%
Dividend Yield
2.22%
HAL: 5Ties: 2SLB: 5
HALSLB

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
HAL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

SLB

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
HAL
$-2.55
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$4.67B
Δ Market Cap
$-11.91B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
SLB
$-2.44
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$7.59B
Δ Market Cap
$-18.53B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
HAL
68.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 68.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $34.93
Fair Value: $110.26
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
SLB
69.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 69.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $48.09
Fair Value: $160.02
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
HAL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $35?

+5.8%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market roughly matching historical growth — reasonable.

SLB

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $48?

+9.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +6.0%

The market implies +9.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +6.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
HAL
69/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
SLB
79/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
HAL
-2.68
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
SLB
-2.51
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
HAL
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 89.4%Retail & Other 10.1%
No. of Institutional Holders1,602
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
SLB
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 92.6%Retail & Other 7.2%
No. of Institutional Holders2,253
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
HAL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
WEISS JANET L.
Director
$169,162
@ $19.79 · 2025-05-29
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
SLB
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
HAL
5
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $34.22M
BECKWITH VAN H.
Officer
$8.19M
@ $41.29 · 2026-05-15
MAXWELL MICHAEL CASEY
Officer
$852,445
@ $41.89 · 2026-05-05
YOUNG TOBI M. EDWARDS
Director
$255,538
@ $41.72 · 2026-04-30
MCKEON TIMOTHY M.
Officer and Treasurer
$363,510
@ $42.00 · 2026-04-30
MILLER JEFFREY ALLEN
Chief Executive Officer
$6.34M
@ $40.00 · 2026-03-27
BECKWITH VAN H.
Officer
$663,481
@ $33.82 · 2026-03-16
SLOCUM JEFFREY SHANNON
Chief Operating Officer
$184,015
@ $33.82 · 2026-03-16
MCKEON TIMOTHY M.
Officer and Treasurer
$132,187
@ $34.37 · 2026-03-06
BANKS MARGARET KATHERINE
Director
$88,855
@ $34.17 · 2026-01-26
BECKWITH VAN H.
Officer
$1.90M
@ $34.96 · 2026-01-23
MILLER JEFFREY ALLEN
Chief Executive Officer
$5.99M
@ $34.96 · 2026-01-23
BECKWITH VAN H.
Officer
$574,875
@ $32.30 · 2026-01-09
SLOCUM JEFFREY SHANNON
Chief Operating Officer
$771,808
@ $32.30 · 2026-01-09
POPE LAWRENCE J.
Officer
$3.23M
@ $32.25 · 2026-01-05
BECKWITH VAN H.
Officer
$246,938
@ $27.89 · 2025-12-05
RICHARD MARK
Officer
$4.44M
@ $27.77 · 2025-11-12
CARRE ERIC
Chief Financial Officer
$1.28M
@ $25.00 · 2025-03-14
MCKEON TIMOTHY M.
Officer and Treasurer
$258,226
@ $24.60 · 2025-03-07
BANKS MARGARET KATHERINE
Director
$93,736
@ $24.03 · 2025-03-04
CARRE ERIC
Chief Financial Officer
$3.69M
@ $26.13 · 2025-02-11
BECKWITH VAN H.
Officer
$367,500
@ $36.75 · 2024-07-18
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
SLB
6
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $23.08M
LE PEUCH OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$1.42M
@ $56.99 · 2026-05-27
DE LA CHEVARDIERE PATRICK
Director
$108,660
@ $54.33 · 2026-05-07
GASSEN STEVE MATTHEW
Officer
$3.00M
@ $56.18 · 2026-05-01
LE PEUCH OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$1.41M
@ $56.48 · 2026-04-29
DE LA CHEVARDIERE PATRICK
Director
$208,100
@ $52.02 · 2026-03-26
LE PEUCH OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$1.26M
@ $50.56 · 2026-03-25
LE PEUCH OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$1.30M
@ $52.00 · 2026-02-25
LE PEUCH OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$1.26M
@ $50.40 · 2026-01-28
DE LA CHEVARDIERE PATRICK
Director
$201,160
@ $50.29 · 2026-01-26
BIGUET STEPHANE
Chief Financial Officer
$3.03M
@ $49.70 · 2026-01-26
RALSTON DIANNE B
Officer
$921,542
@ $49.50 · 2026-01-26
MERAD ABDELLAH
Officer
$2.98M
@ $49.70 · 2026-01-26
GUILD HOWARD
Officer
$659,420
@ $49.70 · 2026-01-26
COLEMAN PETER JOHN
Director
$197,010
@ $35.82 · 2025-11-26
BIGUET STEPHANE
Chief Financial Officer
$1.41M
@ $36.75 · 2025-11-13
MERAD ABDELLAH
Officer
$2.26M
@ $37.69 · 2025-11-11
RALSTON DIANNE B
Officer
$1.43M
@ $36.08 · 2025-09-12
DE LA CHEVARDIERE PATRICK
Director
$167,900
@ $33.58 · 2025-05-22
RAMAN APARNA
Officer
$1.06M
@ $42.28 · 2025-03-28
RENNICK GAVIN
Officer
$1.10M
@ $40.92 · 2025-02-26
RANDO BEJAR CARMEN
Officer
$223,252
@ $40.41 · 2025-01-31
MERAD ABDELLAH
Officer
$2.49M
@ $41.44 · 2025-01-29
AL MOGHARBEL KHALED
Officer
$5.43M
@ $44.09 · 2025-01-21
KASIBHATLA VIJAY
Officer
$1.10M
@ $43.94 · 2025-01-21
PRECHNER UGO
Officer
$309,435
@ $44.20 · 2025-01-21
BIGUET STEPHANE
Chief Financial Officer
$1.97M
@ $43.87 · 2025-01-21
RALSTON DIANNE B
Officer
$1.90M
@ $43.96 · 2025-01-21
GUILD HOWARD
Officer
$595,228
@ $43.87 · 2025-01-21
BIGUET STEPHANE
Chief Financial Officer
$512,294
@ $44.47 · 2024-11-13
MERAD ABDELLAH
Officer
$2.51M
@ $41.90 · 2024-10-24
DE LA CHEVARDIERE PATRICK
Director
$430,055
@ $43.01 · 2024-09-04
AL MOGHARBEL KHALED
Officer
$6.06M
@ $50.19 · 2024-07-22
BIGUET STEPHANE
Chief Financial Officer
$2.50M
@ $49.94 · 2024-07-22
KASIBHATLA VIJAY
Officer
$492,900
@ $49.29 · 2024-07-22
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
HAL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(45/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
SLB
FearGreed
😐Neutral(42/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
HAL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (45)
SLB
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (42)
View HAL Full AnalysisView SLB Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: HAL vs SLB

Is Halliburton Company or SLB N.V. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, SLB trades at a 72.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $176 vs. price $48), compared to HAL's 68.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $110 vs. $35).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Halliburton Company or SLB N.V.?

SLB scores 79/100 (Wide moat), while HAL scores 69/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is SLB N.V. in financial distress?

SLB's Altman Z-Score of 2.8 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. HAL scores 3.4 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Halliburton Company or SLB N.V.?

Halliburton Company (HAL) generates a 6.9% free cash flow yield, compared to SLB N.V.'s 6.3%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Halliburton Company or SLB N.V.?

HAL earns 11.6% ROIC versus SLB's 8.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Halliburton Company's or SLB N.V.'s?

HAL's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to SLB's 85/100 (Very Safe). HAL has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.