Compare StocksHAL vs ORCL

Halliburton Company (HAL) vs Oracle Corporation (ORCL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, HAL is undervalued at $32, with a DCF intrinsic value of $114 and a margin of safety of 72%. ORCL is undervalued at $130, with an intrinsic value of $404 and a margin of safety of 68%. Of the two, HAL has the wider margin of safety.

HAL
Halliburton Company
$32.25
VS
ORCL
Oracle Corporation
$129.87

Rewards

HAL
  • Halliburton Company has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 10.7% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.05 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.
ORCL
  • Gross margin of 65.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.80 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

HAL
  • Gross margin of 15.1% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • FCF yield of 7.6% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • Insiders have sold $9.1M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
ORCL
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • High leverage (3.15x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.4x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
HAL
ORCL
Valuation
$2.05B
Free Cash Flow
$-24.54B
7.62%
FCF Yield
-6.56%
16.88
Trailing P/E
22.28
11.08
Forward P/E
11.93
Quality & Moat
11.75%
ROIC
9.15%
14.92%
ROE
53.38%
15.08%
Gross Margin
65.82%
0.79
PEG Ratio
0.73
Balance Sheet Safety
0.56
Net Debt / Equity
3.15
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.49
Net Debt / EBITDA
4.44
2.11%
Dividend Yield
1.54%
HAL: 8Ties: 1ORCL: 3
HALORCL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
HAL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

ORCL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
HAL
$-2.55
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$4.67B
Δ Market Cap
$-11.91B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
ORCL
$3.51
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$25.08B
Δ Market Cap
+$87.99B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
HAL
71.6% Margin of Safety
Price is 71.6% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $32.25
Fair Value: $113.73
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
ORCL
67.8% Margin of Safety
Price is 67.8% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $129.87
Fair Value: $403.51
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
HAL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $32?

+4.8%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market roughly matching historical growth — reasonable.

ORCL

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
HAL
69/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
ORCL
67/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
HAL
-2.68
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
ORCL
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
HAL
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 84.1%Retail & Other 15.5%
No. of Institutional Holders1,593
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
ORCL
Insiders 40.5%Institutions 43.9%Retail & Other 15.6%
No. of Institutional Holders4,502
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
HAL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
WEISS JANET L.
Director
$169,162
@ $19.79 · 2025-05-29
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
ORCL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
FAIRHEAD RONA ALISON
Director
$112,258
@ $233.87 · 2025-07-07
MOORMAN CHARLES W IV
Director
$947,913
@ $172.35 · 2025-02-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
HAL
2
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $35.10M
CARRE ERIC
Chief Financial Officer
$889,282
@ $35.89 · 2026-06-18
BECKWITH VAN H.
Officer
$8.19M
@ $41.29 · 2026-05-15
MAXWELL MICHAEL CASEY
Officer
$852,445
@ $41.89 · 2026-05-05
MCKEON TIMOTHY M.
Officer and Treasurer
$363,510
@ $42.00 · 2026-04-30
YOUNG TOBI M. EDWARDS
Director
$255,538
@ $41.72 · 2026-04-30
MILLER JEFFREY ALLEN
Chief Executive Officer
$6.34M
@ $40.00 · 2026-03-27
BECKWITH VAN H.
Officer
$663,481
@ $33.82 · 2026-03-16
SLOCUM JEFFREY SHANNON
Chief Operating Officer
$184,015
@ $33.82 · 2026-03-16
MCKEON TIMOTHY M.
Officer and Treasurer
$132,187
@ $34.37 · 2026-03-06
BANKS MARGARET KATHERINE
Director
$88,855
@ $34.17 · 2026-01-26
BECKWITH VAN H.
Officer
$1.90M
@ $34.96 · 2026-01-23
MILLER JEFFREY ALLEN
Chief Executive Officer
$5.99M
@ $34.96 · 2026-01-23
BECKWITH VAN H.
Officer
$574,875
@ $32.30 · 2026-01-09
SLOCUM JEFFREY SHANNON
Chief Operating Officer
$771,808
@ $32.30 · 2026-01-09
POPE LAWRENCE J.
Officer
$3.23M
@ $32.25 · 2026-01-05
BECKWITH VAN H.
Officer
$246,938
@ $27.89 · 2025-12-05
RICHARD MARK
Officer
$4.44M
@ $27.77 · 2025-11-12
CARRE ERIC
Chief Financial Officer
$1.28M
@ $25.00 · 2025-03-14
MCKEON TIMOTHY M.
Officer and Treasurer
$258,226
@ $24.60 · 2025-03-07
BANKS MARGARET KATHERINE
Director
$93,736
@ $24.03 · 2025-03-04
CARRE ERIC
Chief Financial Officer
$3.69M
@ $26.13 · 2025-02-11
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
ORCL
1
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $126.77M
HENLEY JEFFREY O
Officer and Director
$63.66M
@ $159.16 · 2026-06-24
LEVEY STUART A
Officer
$2.64M
@ $176.19 · 2026-04-16
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.55M
@ $155.23 · 2026-02-09
KEHRING DOUGLAS A
Officer
$6.82M
@ $194.89 · 2026-01-15
HURA MARK
Officer
$2.95M
@ $196.89 · 2025-12-24
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$437,064
@ $196.61 · 2025-12-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.93M
@ $192.52 · 2025-12-19
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$2.80M
@ $280.31 · 2025-10-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$11.07M
@ $276.64 · 2025-10-21
LEVEY STUART A
Officer
$5.93M
@ $300.00 · 2025-10-10
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$641,958
@ $288.91 · 2025-09-26
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$10.87M
@ $321.16 · 2025-09-23
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$5.12M
@ $313.60 · 2025-09-16
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
President
$6.31M
@ $297.11 · 2025-09-12
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$4.04M
@ $254.48 · 2025-08-05
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$770,656
@ $233.32 · 2025-07-16
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$2.33M
@ $232.99 · 2025-07-03
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$267.24M
@ $212.01 · 2025-06-27
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$794.64M
@ $212.50 · 2025-06-26
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$764.01M
@ $206.77 · 2025-06-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Officer
$3.21M
@ $214.10 · 2025-06-17
CONRADES GEORGE HENRY
Director
$1.74M
@ $213.49 · 2025-06-17
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$428,562
@ $149.53 · 2025-05-05
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$291,620
@ $145.81 · 2025-04-02
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$705.46M
@ $185.40 · 2025-01-24
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$1.04M
@ $165.00 · 2024-09-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
HAL
FearGreed
😨Fear(39/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
ORCL
FearGreed
😨Fear(33/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
HAL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
ORCL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (33)
View HAL Full AnalysisView ORCL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: HAL vs ORCL

Is Halliburton Company or Oracle Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, HAL trades at a 71.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $114 vs. price $32), compared to ORCL's 67.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $404 vs. $130).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Halliburton Company or Oracle Corporation?

HAL scores 69/100 (Narrow moat), while ORCL scores 67/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Oracle Corporation in financial distress?

ORCL's Altman Z-Score of 1.6 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. HAL scores 3.4 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Halliburton Company or Oracle Corporation?

Halliburton Company (HAL) generates a 7.6% free cash flow yield, compared to Oracle Corporation's -6.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Halliburton Company or Oracle Corporation?

HAL earns 11.7% ROIC versus ORCL's 9.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Halliburton Company's or Oracle Corporation's?

HAL's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to ORCL's 79/100 (Safe). HAL has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.