Compare StocksHAL vs INTU

Halliburton Company (HAL) vs Intuit Inc. (INTU): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, HAL is undervalued at $35, with a DCF intrinsic value of $112 and a margin of safety of 69%. INTU is undervalued at $318, with an intrinsic value of $565 and a margin of safety of 44%. Of the two, HAL has the wider margin of safety.

HAL
Halliburton Company
$34.51
VS
INTU
Intuit Inc.
$318.13

Rewards

HAL
  • Halliburton Company has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 10.7% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.05 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.
INTU
  • Intuit Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 81.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Intuit Inc. scores 94/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

HAL
  • Gross margin of 15.1% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • FCF yield of 7.1% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • Insiders have sold $7.7M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
INTU

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    HAL
    INTU
    Valuation
    $2.05B
    Free Cash Flow
    $8.62B
    7.14%
    FCF Yield
    10.14%
    18.07
    Trailing P/E
    19.34
    11.89
    Forward P/E
    11.63
    Quality & Moat
    11.75%
    ROIC
    10.90%
    14.92%
    ROE
    23.60%
    15.08%
    Gross Margin
    80.98%
    0.73
    PEG Ratio
    1.08
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.56
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.06
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    1.49
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.18
    1.97%
    Dividend Yield
    1.74%
    HAL: 4Ties: 2INTU: 6
    HALINTU

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    HAL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    INTU

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    HAL
    $-2.55
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $4.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-11.91B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTU
    $-11.48
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $7.83B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-89.89B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    HAL
    69.2% Margin of Safety
    Price is 69.2% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $34.51
    Fair Value: $112.15
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTU
    43.7% Margin of Safety
    Price is 43.7% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $318.13
    Fair Value: $565.45
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    HAL

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $35?

    +5.5%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market roughly matching historical growth — reasonable.

    INTU

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $318?

    +5.2%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -1.9%

    The market implies +5.2% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -1.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    HAL
    69/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTU
    94/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    HAL
    -2.68
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTU
    -2.98
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    HAL
    Insiders 0.4%Institutions 90.4%Retail & Other 9.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,637
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTU
    Insiders 2.4%Institutions 93.5%Retail & Other 4.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,541
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    HAL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    WEISS JANET L.
    Director
    $169,162
    @ $19.79 · 2025-05-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTU
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $541,665
    PRABHU VASANT M.
    Director
    $541,665
    @ $309.52 · 2026-05-26
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    HAL
    4
    Sells (3M)
    21
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $42.80M
    CARRE ERIC
    Chief Financial Officer
    $929,138
    @ $37.50 · 2026-08-31
    SLOCUM JEFFREY SHANNON
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.84M
    @ $35.09 · 2026-08-19
    SLOCUM JEFFREY SHANNON
    Chief Operating Officer
    $565,573
    @ $35.08 · 2026-08-18
    MILLER JEFFREY ALLEN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.36M
    @ $35.00 · 2026-08-18
    CARRE ERIC
    Chief Financial Officer
    $889,282
    @ $35.89 · 2026-06-18
    BECKWITH VAN H.
    Officer
    $8.19M
    @ $41.29 · 2026-05-15
    MAXWELL MICHAEL CASEY
    Officer
    $852,445
    @ $41.89 · 2026-05-05
    YOUNG TOBI M. EDWARDS
    Director
    $255,538
    @ $41.72 · 2026-04-30
    MCKEON TIMOTHY M.
    Officer and Treasurer
    $363,510
    @ $42.00 · 2026-04-30
    MILLER JEFFREY ALLEN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $6.34M
    @ $40.00 · 2026-03-27
    SLOCUM JEFFREY SHANNON
    Chief Operating Officer
    $184,015
    @ $33.82 · 2026-03-16
    BECKWITH VAN H.
    Officer
    $663,481
    @ $33.82 · 2026-03-16
    MCKEON TIMOTHY M.
    Officer and Treasurer
    $132,187
    @ $34.37 · 2026-03-06
    BANKS MARGARET KATHERINE
    Director
    $88,855
    @ $34.17 · 2026-01-26
    MILLER JEFFREY ALLEN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.99M
    @ $34.96 · 2026-01-23
    BECKWITH VAN H.
    Officer
    $1.90M
    @ $34.96 · 2026-01-23
    SLOCUM JEFFREY SHANNON
    Chief Operating Officer
    $771,808
    @ $32.30 · 2026-01-09
    BECKWITH VAN H.
    Officer
    $574,875
    @ $32.30 · 2026-01-09
    POPE LAWRENCE J.
    Officer
    $3.23M
    @ $32.25 · 2026-01-05
    BECKWITH VAN H.
    Officer
    $246,938
    @ $27.89 · 2025-12-05
    RICHARD MARK
    Officer
    $4.44M
    @ $27.77 · 2025-11-12
    CARRE ERIC
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.28M
    @ $25.00 · 2025-03-14
    MCKEON TIMOTHY M.
    Officer and Treasurer
    $258,226
    @ $24.60 · 2025-03-07
    BANKS MARGARET KATHERINE
    Director
    $93,736
    @ $24.03 · 2025-03-04
    CARRE ERIC
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.69M
    @ $26.13 · 2025-02-11
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTU
    3
    Sells (3M)
    11
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $4.34M
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $92,728
    @ $325.36 · 2026-09-08
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $314,288
    @ $346.90 · 2026-08-27
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $74,499
    @ $262.32 · 2026-06-23
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $80,145
    @ $282.20 · 2026-06-16
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $289,448
    @ $288.29 · 2026-06-11
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $457,046
    @ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $840,097
    @ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $741,172
    @ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $219,763
    @ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $435,354
    @ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $792,160
    @ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $665,951
    @ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $27,930
    @ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $255,887
    @ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $521,891
    @ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $689,400
    @ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.03M
    @ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.25M
    @ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $887,583
    @ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $1.36M
    @ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.12M
    @ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $26.12M
    @ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $19.29M
    @ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $30.46M
    @ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
    MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
    General Counsel
    $12.18M
    @ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $11.66M
    @ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $340,143
    @ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $5.00M
    @ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $4.43M
    @ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
    BURTON EVE B
    Director
    $1.02M
    @ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $667,838
    @ $619.52 · 2025-01-10
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $814,350
    @ $626.42 · 2025-01-08
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $2.94M
    @ $613.70 · 2025-01-07
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $68,506
    @ $628.50 · 2025-01-03
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    HAL
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(48/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTU
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(31/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    HAL
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
    INTU
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (31)
    View HAL Full AnalysisView INTU Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: HAL vs INTU

    Is Halliburton Company or Intuit Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, HAL trades at a 69.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $112 vs. price $35), compared to INTU's 43.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $565 vs. $318).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Halliburton Company or Intuit Inc.?

    INTU scores 94/100 (Wide moat), while HAL scores 69/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Halliburton Company or Intuit Inc.?

    Intuit Inc. (INTU) generates a 10.1% free cash flow yield, compared to Halliburton Company's 7.1%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Halliburton Company or Intuit Inc.?

    HAL earns 11.7% ROIC versus INTU's 10.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Halliburton Company's or Intuit Inc.'s?

    INTU's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to HAL's 94/100 (Very Safe). INTU has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.