Compare StocksGS vs UBER

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) vs Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER)

GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
$809.50
VS
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.
$75.34

Rewards

GS
  • Gross margin of 82.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Share count has been reduced by 11% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.60 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
UBER
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 192.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.48 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Management has timed buybacks well — 2 out of 2 years showed value-accretive repurchases.

Risks

GS
  • The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. scores only 26/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • High leverage (5.96x debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.25 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
UBER
  • FCF yield of 6.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GS
UBER
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$9.76B
N/A
FCF Yield
6.24%
15.77
Trailing P/E
15.93
12.45
Forward P/E
17.56
Quality & Moat
2.06%
ROIC
12.57%
13.00%
ROE
35.80%
82.88%
Gross Margin
38.50%
0.91
PEG Ratio
N/A
Balance Sheet Safety
5.96
Debt / Equity
0.44
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.74
2.22%
Dividend Yield
N/A
GS: 2Ties: 2UBER: 3
GSUBER

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

UBER

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GS
$5.60
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$26.00B
Δ Market Cap
+$145.60B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
UBER
$5.48
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$21.80B
Δ Market Cap
+$119.37B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GS
65.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 65.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $809.50
Fair Value: $2319.70
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
UBER
78.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 78.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $75.34
Fair Value: $345.37
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

UBER

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $75?

+4.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +5.1%

The market implies +4.7% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +5.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GS
26/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
UBER
47/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GS
-2.00
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
UBER
-2.29
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GS
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 75.7%Retail & Other 23.8%
No. of Institutional Holders3,730
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
UBER
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 85.9%Retail & Other 13.7%
No. of Institutional Holders3,359
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GS
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.00M
HESS JOHN B JR.
Director
$2.00M
@ $511.68 · 2025-04-15
JOHNSON KEVIN RONALD
Director
$1.49M
@ $619.02 · 2025-01-17
FLAHERTY MARK A
Director
$29,545
@ $360.30 · 2024-09-27
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
UBER
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.60M
KRISHNAMURTHY BALAJI
Chief Financial Officer
$1.60M
@ $71.25 · 2026-02-24
MAHENDRA-RAJAH PRASHANTH
Chief Financial Officer
$465.00
@ $93.00 · 2025-10-14
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GS
6
Sells (3M)
11
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $59.99M
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$10.94M
@ $941.57 · 2026-02-09
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$255,387
@ $938.92 · 2026-01-29
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$2.64M
@ $927.17 · 2026-01-27
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$4.49M
@ $923.75 · 2026-01-23
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$8.89M
@ $927.51 · 2026-01-23
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$1.62M
@ $920.62 · 2026-01-23
WALDRON JOHN E.
President
$13.69M
@ $750.30 · 2025-08-28
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$5.41M
@ $724.40 · 2025-07-25
ROGERS JOHN F W
Officer
$4.31M
@ $717.39 · 2025-07-23
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$4.71M
@ $712.31 · 2025-07-23
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.04M
@ $607.17 · 2025-05-14
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.50M
@ $622.15 · 2025-02-26
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$3.31M
@ $636.25 · 2025-01-28
HALIO CAREY
Officer and Treasurer
$2.32M
@ $636.74 · 2025-01-24
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$1.28M
@ $627.01 · 2025-01-21
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$4.76M
@ $634.69 · 2025-01-21
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$965,120
@ $624.67 · 2025-01-21
VINIAR DAVID A
Director
$3.06M
@ $612.08 · 2024-11-29
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$4.00M
@ $610.91 · 2024-11-29
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$1.77M
@ $594.51 · 2024-11-06
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$7.67M
@ $593.03 · 2024-11-06
ROGERS JOHN F W
Officer
$3.83M
@ $596.36 · 2024-11-06
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.00M
@ $500.29 · 2024-08-15
VINIAR DAVID A
Director
$2.51M
@ $502.43 · 2024-07-16
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.02M
@ $457.32 · 2024-05-10
VINIAR DAVID A
Director
$2.16M
@ $432.25 · 2024-04-29
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
UBER
1
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $65.74M
KRISHNAMURTHY TANYA NICHOLE
Officer
$2.23M
@ $74.45 · 2026-03-16
WEST, TONY
Officer
$251,125
@ $80.36 · 2025-12-18
WEST, TONY
Officer
$287,812
@ $92.10 · 2025-11-18
MAHENDRA-RAJAH PRASHANTH
Chief Financial Officer
$519,234
@ $94.41 · 2025-11-12
WEST, TONY
Officer
$290,625
@ $93.00 · 2025-10-20
KHOSROWSHAHI DARA
Chief Executive Officer
$15.07M
@ $100.48 · 2025-09-22
WEST, TONY
Officer
$10.04M
@ $100.38 · 2025-09-22
WEST, TONY
Officer
$293,562
@ $93.94 · 2025-09-18
MAHENDRA-RAJAH PRASHANTH
Chief Financial Officer
$273,405
@ $99.42 · 2025-09-16
KHOSROWSHAHI DARA
Chief Executive Officer
$28.61M
@ $95.37 · 2025-09-12
WEST, TONY
Officer
$296,875
@ $95.00 · 2025-08-26
HAZELBAKER JILL
Officer
$3.01M
@ $96.42 · 2025-08-22
KRISHNAMURTHY TANYA NICHOLE
Officer
$1.06M
@ $91.74 · 2025-08-15
MAHENDRA-RAJAH PRASHANTH
Chief Financial Officer
$261,250
@ $95.00 · 2025-07-07
HAZELBAKER JILL
Officer
$3.00M
@ $86.03 · 2025-05-12
MAHENDRA-RAJAH PRASHANTH
Chief Financial Officer
$233,750
@ $85.00 · 2025-05-05
MAHENDRA-RAJAH PRASHANTH
Chief Financial Officer
$206,250
@ $75.00 · 2025-03-20
WEST, TONY
Officer
$3.31M
@ $70.59 · 2025-03-14
KRISHNAMURTHY TANYA NICHOLE
Officer
$1.43M
@ $71.57 · 2025-03-14
HAZELBAKER JILL
Officer
$2.51M
@ $81.02 · 2025-02-18
HAZELBAKER JILL
Officer
$2.03M
@ $72.90 · 2024-11-25
HAZELBAKER JILL
Officer
$2.88M
@ $72.00 · 2024-09-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
UBER
FearGreed
😐Neutral(45/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
UBER
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (45)
View GS Full AnalysisView UBER Full Analysis