Compare StocksGS vs TSCO

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) vs Tractor Supply Company (TSCO): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, GS is undervalued at $955, with a DCF intrinsic value of $1956 and a margin of safety of 51%. TSCO is overvalued at $33, with an intrinsic value of $29 and a margin of safety of -15%. Of the two, GS has the wider margin of safety.

GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
$954.87
VS
TSCO
Tractor Supply Company
$33.05

Rewards

GS
  • Gross margin of 82.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Share count has been reduced by 11% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.58 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
TSCO
  • Tractor Supply Company has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Tractor Supply Company scores 86/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

GS
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.25 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • 16 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
TSCO
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.04 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
  • High leverage (2.40x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GS
TSCO
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$740.49M
N/A
FCF Yield
4.30%
14.75
Trailing P/E
17.22
12.90
Forward P/E
16.14
Quality & Moat
2.20%
ROIC
16.37%
16.90%
ROE
39.51%
82.08%
Gross Margin
36.50%
1.16
PEG Ratio
1.55
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
2.40
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.27
2.13%
Dividend Yield
2.93%
GS: 5Ties: 1TSCO: 3
GSTSCO

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TSCO

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GS
$5.60
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$26.00B
Δ Market Cap
+$145.60B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TSCO
$0.82
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Mediocre Allocator
Σ Retained
$1.89B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.55B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GS
51.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 51.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $954.87
Fair Value: $1956.24
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TSCO
15.3% Overvalued
Price is 15.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $33.05
Fair Value: $28.67
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

TSCO

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $33?

+8.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +14.0%

The market implies +8.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +14.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GS
65/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TSCO
86/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GS
-2.00
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TSCO
-2.60
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GS
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 75.8%Retail & Other 23.6%
No. of Institutional Holders3,994
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TSCO
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 96.8%Retail & Other 2.9%
No. of Institutional Holders1,482
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GS
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
HESS JOHN B JR.
Director
$2.00M
@ $511.68 · 2025-04-15
JOHNSON KEVIN RONALD
Director
$1.49M
@ $619.02 · 2025-01-17
FLAHERTY MARK A
Director
$29,545
@ $360.30 · 2024-09-27
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TSCO
4
Buys (3M)
5
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $658,321
HAM MARGARET M
Director
$2,975
@ $35.42 · 2026-09-04
MORRIS EDNA K
Director
$50,606
@ $32.44 · 2026-08-04
LAWTON HARRY A III
Chief Executive Officer
$501,524
@ $32.15 · 2026-08-04
HAWAUX ANDRE J
Director
$100,264
@ $31.83 · 2026-08-03
HAM MARGARET M
Director
$2,952
@ $30.43 · 2026-06-08
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GS
3
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $65.54M
LESLIE ERICKA T
Officer
$620,280
@ $1033.80 · 2026-08-28
LESLIE ERICKA T
Officer
$184,445
@ $1053.97 · 2026-08-04
LESLIE ERICKA T
Officer
$287,951
@ $1151.80 · 2026-07-15
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$6.68M
@ $973.55 · 2026-05-14
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$13.42M
@ $939.07 · 2026-05-06
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$9.57M
@ $929.17 · 2026-05-01
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$634,927
@ $929.61 · 2026-05-01
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.23M
@ $930.70 · 2026-05-01
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$1.04M
@ $936.18 · 2026-04-23
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$1.02M
@ $919.19 · 2026-04-17
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$10.94M
@ $941.57 · 2026-02-09
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$255,387
@ $938.92 · 2026-01-29
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$2.64M
@ $927.17 · 2026-01-27
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$4.49M
@ $923.75 · 2026-01-23
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$8.89M
@ $927.51 · 2026-01-23
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$1.62M
@ $920.62 · 2026-01-23
WALDRON JOHN E.
President
$13.69M
@ $750.30 · 2025-08-28
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$5.41M
@ $724.40 · 2025-07-25
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$4.71M
@ $712.31 · 2025-07-23
ROGERS JOHN F W
Officer
$4.31M
@ $717.39 · 2025-07-23
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.04M
@ $607.17 · 2025-05-14
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.50M
@ $622.15 · 2025-02-26
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$3.31M
@ $636.25 · 2025-01-28
HALIO CAREY
Officer and Treasurer
$2.32M
@ $636.74 · 2025-01-24
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$1.28M
@ $627.01 · 2025-01-21
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$4.76M
@ $634.69 · 2025-01-21
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$965,120
@ $624.67 · 2025-01-21
VINIAR DAVID A
Director
$3.06M
@ $612.08 · 2024-11-29
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$4.00M
@ $610.91 · 2024-11-29
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$1.77M
@ $594.51 · 2024-11-06
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$7.67M
@ $593.03 · 2024-11-06
ROGERS JOHN F W
Officer
$3.83M
@ $596.36 · 2024-11-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TSCO
0
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $11.96M
YANKEE COLIN
Officer
$618,263
@ $55.35 · 2026-02-13
ESTEP JONATHAN S
Officer
$3.23M
@ $54.03 · 2026-02-11
MILLS ROBERT D.
Chief Technology Officer
$3.41M
@ $54.12 · 2026-02-11
BARTON KURT D.
Chief Financial Officer
$101,378
@ $53.81 · 2026-02-10
BARTON KURT D.
Chief Financial Officer
$104,050
@ $53.94 · 2026-02-06
LAWTON HARRY A III
Chief Executive Officer
$4.50M
@ $53.16 · 2026-02-03
KERSEY MELISSA
Officer
$377,426
@ $59.79 · 2025-08-13
WEIKEL MARK J
Director
$479,360
@ $59.92 · 2025-08-07
YANKEE COLIN
Officer
$390,121
@ $58.40 · 2025-07-28
BARTON KURT D.
Chief Financial Officer
$5.76M
@ $63.96 · 2025-07-24
ELLISON-SOUTHALL NONI L
General Counsel
$332,592
@ $63.96 · 2025-07-24
JACKSON DENISE L
Director
$68,152
@ $58.50 · 2025-07-22
JACKSON DENISE L
Director
$115,500
@ $57.75 · 2025-07-10
JACKSON DENISE L
Director
$57,000
@ $57.00 · 2025-07-09
ESTEP JONATHAN S
Officer
$2.01M
@ $56.00 · 2025-07-07
JACKSON DENISE L
Director
$258,965
@ $55.93 · 2025-07-07
JACKSON DENISE L
Director
$85,250
@ $55.00 · 2025-07-02
ESTEP JONATHAN S
Officer
$3.00M
@ $53.00 · 2025-06-23
RUBIN MATTHEW LAWRENCE
President
$145,446
@ $51.76 · 2025-05-14
RUBIN MATTHEW LAWRENCE
Officer
$222,091
@ $57.69 · 2025-02-20
BARTON KURT D.
Chief Financial Officer
$680,176
@ $56.00 · 2025-02-13
YANKEE COLIN
Officer
$1.33M
@ $54.15 · 2025-02-11
KERSEY MELISSA
Officer
$494,472
@ $53.17 · 2025-02-06
LAWTON HARRY A III
Chief Executive Officer
$4.81M
@ $54.59 · 2025-02-03
BARTON KURT D.
Chief Financial Officer
$6.96M
@ $295.64 · 2024-10-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(46/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TSCO
FearGreed
😨Fear(31/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (46)
TSCO
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (31)
View GS Full AnalysisView TSCO Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: GS vs TSCO

Is The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. or Tractor Supply Company more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, GS trades at a 51.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $1956 vs. price $955), compared to TSCO's -15.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $29 vs. $33).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. or Tractor Supply Company?

TSCO scores 86/100 (Wide moat), while GS scores 65/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. in financial distress?

GS's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TSCO scores 4.8 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. or Tractor Supply Company?

TSCO earns 16.4% ROIC versus GS's 2.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s or Tractor Supply Company's?

TSCO's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to GS's 79/100 (Safe). TSCO has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

GS vs TSCO: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io