Compare StocksGS vs TRV

Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) (GS) vs The Travelers Companies, Inc. (TRV): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, GS is undervalued at $1018, with a DCF intrinsic value of $481431875452 and a margin of safety of 100%. TRV is fairly valued at $374, with an intrinsic value of $442 and a margin of safety of 15%. Of the two, GS has the wider margin of safety.

GS
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The)
$1018.38
VS
TRV
The Travelers Companies, Inc.
$374.36

Rewards

GS
  • Gross margin of 82.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.58 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
TRV
  • The Travelers Companies, Inc. scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 17.9% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.35 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

GS
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.16 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Insiders have sold $20.4M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
TRV
  • PEG ratio of 2.36 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • 10 insider sales totaling $25.7M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GS
TRV
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$14.78B
N/A
FCF Yield
18.92%
15.72
Trailing P/E
10.06
13.81
Forward P/E
12.41
Quality & Moat
2.46%
ROIC
21.73%
16.95%
ROE
26.51%
82.08%
Gross Margin
34.73%
1.45
PEG Ratio
2.36
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
0.12
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.35
1.96%
Dividend Yield
1.34%
GS: 4Ties: 1TRV: 4
GSTRV

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TRV

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GS
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$26.00B
Δ Market Cap
+$535.62
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TRV
$1.71
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$11.44B
Δ Market Cap
+$19.57B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GS
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $1018.38
Fair Value: $481431875452.18
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TRV
15.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 15.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $374.36
Fair Value: $442.32
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

TRV

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $374?

+1.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -10.5%

The market implies +1.9% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -10.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GS
65/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TRV
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GS
-2.00
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TRV
-2.66
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GS
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 74.8%Retail & Other 24.7%
No. of Institutional Holders3,873
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TRV
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 89.8%Retail & Other 9.9%
No. of Institutional Holders2,366
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GS
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
HESS JOHN B JR.
Director
$2.00M
@ $511.68 · 2025-04-15
JOHNSON KEVIN RONALD
Director
$1.49M
@ $619.02 · 2025-01-17
FLAHERTY MARK A
Director
$29,545
@ $360.30 · 2024-09-27
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TRV
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GS
3
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $78.42M
LESLIE ERICKA T
Officer
$287,951
@ $1151.80 · 2026-07-15
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$6.68M
@ $973.55 · 2026-05-14
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$13.42M
@ $939.07 · 2026-05-06
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$634,927
@ $929.61 · 2026-05-01
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$9.57M
@ $929.17 · 2026-05-01
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.23M
@ $930.70 · 2026-05-01
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$1.04M
@ $936.18 · 2026-04-23
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$1.02M
@ $919.19 · 2026-04-17
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$10.94M
@ $941.57 · 2026-02-09
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$255,387
@ $938.92 · 2026-01-29
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$2.64M
@ $927.17 · 2026-01-27
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$8.89M
@ $927.51 · 2026-01-23
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$1.62M
@ $920.62 · 2026-01-23
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$4.49M
@ $923.75 · 2026-01-23
WALDRON JOHN E.
President
$13.69M
@ $750.30 · 2025-08-28
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$5.41M
@ $724.40 · 2025-07-25
ROGERS JOHN F W
Officer
$4.31M
@ $717.39 · 2025-07-23
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$4.71M
@ $712.31 · 2025-07-23
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.04M
@ $607.17 · 2025-05-14
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.50M
@ $622.15 · 2025-02-26
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$3.31M
@ $636.25 · 2025-01-28
HALIO CAREY
Officer and Treasurer
$2.32M
@ $636.74 · 2025-01-24
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$965,120
@ $624.67 · 2025-01-21
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$1.28M
@ $627.01 · 2025-01-21
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$4.76M
@ $634.69 · 2025-01-21
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$4.00M
@ $610.91 · 2024-11-29
VINIAR DAVID A
Director
$3.06M
@ $612.08 · 2024-11-29
ROGERS JOHN F W
Officer
$3.83M
@ $596.36 · 2024-11-06
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$7.67M
@ $593.03 · 2024-11-06
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$1.77M
@ $594.51 · 2024-11-06
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.00M
@ $500.29 · 2024-08-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TRV
10
Sells (3M)
43
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $111.27M
YIN DANIEL TEI-HWA
Chief Investment Officer
$2.77M
@ $387.00 · 2026-07-24
KURTZMAN DIANE
Officer
$1.61M
@ $386.71 · 2026-07-24
MUNSON PAUL E
Officer
$564,105
@ $369.90 · 2026-07-22
ROWLAND DAVID DONNAY
Chief Investment Officer
$1.86M
@ $371.69 · 2026-07-22
BESSETTE ANDY F
Officer
$1.10M
@ $368.11 · 2026-07-22
LEFEBVRE MOJGAN M
Chief Technology Officer
$6.01M
@ $368.38 · 2026-07-21
FREY DANIEL S.
Chief Financial Officer
$5.17M
@ $368.24 · 2026-07-21
KLEIN MICHAEL FREDERICK
Officer
$2.20M
@ $366.09 · 2026-07-21
KLEIN MICHAEL FREDERICK
Officer
$3.08M
@ $307.65 · 2026-05-26
BESSETTE ANDY F
Officer
$1.31M
@ $308.11 · 2026-05-22
KESS AVROHOM J
Officer
$2.08M
@ $308.78 · 2026-04-28
HEYMAN WILLIAM H
Officer
$483,670
@ $310.64 · 2026-04-28
KLENK JEFFREY P
Officer
$1.96M
@ $305.09 · 2026-04-20
KURTZMAN DIANE
Officer
$869,980
@ $303.45 · 2026-04-20
KLEIN MICHAEL FREDERICK
Officer
$3.04M
@ $303.77 · 2026-04-20
ROWLAND DAVID DONNAY
Chief Investment Officer
$1.46M
@ $308.52 · 2026-02-26
OLIVO MARIA
Officer
$3.19M
@ $306.60 · 2026-02-26
MUNSON PAUL E
Officer
$1.14M
@ $306.04 · 2026-02-25
HEYMAN WILLIAM H
Officer
$1.53M
@ $306.75 · 2026-02-23
TOCZYDLOWSKI GREGORY C
Officer
$3.66M
@ $299.78 · 2026-02-20
KESS AVROHOM J
Officer
$1.43M
@ $300.44 · 2026-02-20
FREY DANIEL S.
Chief Financial Officer
$2.40M
@ $299.50 · 2026-02-20
LEFEBVRE MOJGAN M
Officer
$1.74M
@ $298.29 · 2026-02-19
BESSETTE ANDY F
Officer
$1.79M
@ $297.65 · 2026-02-17
HEYMAN WILLIAM H
Officer
$300,000
@ $300.00 · 2026-02-17
KLEIN MICHAEL FREDERICK
Officer
$3.01M
@ $301.18 · 2026-02-06
HEYMAN WILLIAM H
Officer
$1.81M
@ $302.17 · 2026-02-06
OLIVO MARIA
Officer
$3.13M
@ $300.75 · 2026-02-06
SCHNITZER ALAN D
Chief Executive Officer
$16.42M
@ $294.70 · 2026-02-04
KLENK JEFFREY P
Officer
$4.68M
@ $279.77 · 2026-01-23
OLIVO MARIA
Officer
$2.64M
@ $295.73 · 2025-11-26
HEYMAN WILLIAM H
Officer
$1.18M
@ $294.50 · 2025-11-25
KURTZMAN DIANE
Officer
$1.39M
@ $290.00 · 2025-11-24
ROWLAND DAVID DONNAY
Chief Investment Officer
$1.45M
@ $290.57 · 2025-11-21
HEYMAN WILLIAM H
Officer
$583,000
@ $291.50 · 2025-11-21
HEYMAN WILLIAM H
Officer
$1.10M
@ $288.47 · 2025-11-13
HEYMAN WILLIAM H
Officer
$1.98M
@ $283.11 · 2025-11-11
FREY DANIEL S.
Chief Financial Officer
$6.96M
@ $278.25 · 2025-11-06
KLEIN MICHAEL FREDERICK
Officer
$2.32M
@ $270.73 · 2025-10-28
LEFEBVRE MOJGAN M
Chief Operating Officer
$4.67M
@ $277.54 · 2025-08-22
HEYMAN WILLIAM H
Officer
$557,000
@ $278.50 · 2025-08-22
BESSETTE ANDY F
Officer
$2.05M
@ $264.90 · 2025-08-07
KLEIN MICHAEL FREDERICK
Officer
$2.62M
@ $261.99 · 2025-08-04
TOCZYDLOWSKI GREGORY C
Officer
$3.06M
@ $266.12 · 2025-07-21
HEYMAN WILLIAM H
Officer
$553,000
@ $276.50 · 2025-05-30
KLENK JEFFREY P
Officer
$4.14M
@ $272.87 · 2025-05-29
MUNSON PAUL E
Officer
$1.11M
@ $273.29 · 2025-05-29
LEFEBVRE MOJGAN M
Chief Operating Officer
$1.68M
@ $273.74 · 2025-05-29
KURTZMAN DIANE
Officer
$1.09M
@ $273.02 · 2025-05-29
ROWLAND DAVID DONNAY
Chief Investment Officer
$3.31M
@ $274.01 · 2025-05-29
SCHNITZER ALAN D
Chief Executive Officer
$9.71M
@ $273.78 · 2025-05-29
KESS AVROHOM J
Officer
$6.42M
@ $273.93 · 2025-05-29
FREY DANIEL S.
Chief Financial Officer
$5.55M
@ $273.48 · 2025-05-29
KLEIN MICHAEL FREDERICK
Officer
$2.48M
@ $274.17 · 2025-05-29
HEYMAN WILLIAM H
Officer
$549,000
@ $274.50 · 2025-05-29
OLIVO MARIA
Officer
$9.93M
@ $274.20 · 2025-05-29
BESSETTE ANDY F
Officer
$1.36M
@ $272.76 · 2025-05-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(53/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TRV
FearGreed
😏Greed(63/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
TRV
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)
View GS Full AnalysisView TRV Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: GS vs TRV

Is Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) or The Travelers Companies, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, GS trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $481431875452 vs. price $1018), compared to TRV's 15.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $442 vs. $374).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) or The Travelers Companies, Inc.?

TRV scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while GS scores 65/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) in financial distress?

GS's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TRV scores 1.2 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) or The Travelers Companies, Inc.?

TRV earns 21.7% ROIC versus GS's 2.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The)'s or The Travelers Companies, Inc.'s?

TRV's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to GS's 79/100 (Safe). TRV has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

GS vs TRV: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io