Compare StocksGS vs TER

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) vs Teradyne, Inc. (TER): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, GS is undervalued at $1097, with a DCF intrinsic value of $2507 and a margin of safety of 56%. TER is overvalued at $438, with an intrinsic value of $267 and a margin of safety of -64%. Of the two, GS has the wider margin of safety.

GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
$1096.56
VS
TER
Teradyne, Inc.
$437.92

Rewards

GS
  • Gross margin of 82.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Share count has been reduced by 11% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.58 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
TER
  • Teradyne, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Teradyne, Inc. scores 72/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Altman Z-Score of 14.86 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.

Risks

GS
  • Trailing P/E of 20.0x is 36% above the historical average of 14.7x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.25 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • 7 insider sales totaling $35.6M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
TER
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • FCF yield of 0.7% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 81.1x is 117% above the historical average of 37.3x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GS
TER
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$450.41M
N/A
FCF Yield
0.66%
20.03
Trailing P/E
81.10
16.71
Forward P/E
46.08
Quality & Moat
1.95%
ROIC
34.88%
14.55%
ROE
28.75%
82.27%
Gross Margin
58.70%
1.68
PEG Ratio
1.62
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.14
1.65%
Dividend Yield
0.13%
GS: 5Ties: 2TER: 2
GSTER

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TER

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GS
$5.60
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$26.00B
Δ Market Cap
+$145.60B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TER
$12.54
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.32B
Δ Market Cap
+$16.61B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GS
56.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 56.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $1096.56
Fair Value: $2506.96
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TER
62.3% Overvalued
Price is 62.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $437.92
Fair Value: $269.87
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

TER

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $438?

+32.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +35.9%

The market implies +32.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +35.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GS
65/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TER
72/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GS
-2.00
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TER
-2.76
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GS
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 74.6%Retail & Other 24.8%
No. of Institutional Holders3,780
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TER
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 96.5%Retail & Other 3.2%
No. of Institutional Holders1,693
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GS
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
HESS JOHN B JR.
Director
$2.00M
@ $511.68 · 2025-04-15
JOHNSON KEVIN RONALD
Director
$1.49M
@ $619.02 · 2025-01-17
FLAHERTY MARK A
Director
$29,545
@ $360.30 · 2024-09-27
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TER
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GS
7
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $92.56M
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$6.68M
@ $973.55 · 2026-05-14
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$13.42M
@ $939.07 · 2026-05-06
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$9.57M
@ $929.17 · 2026-05-01
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$634,927
@ $929.61 · 2026-05-01
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.23M
@ $930.70 · 2026-05-01
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$1.04M
@ $936.18 · 2026-04-23
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$1.02M
@ $919.19 · 2026-04-17
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$10.94M
@ $941.57 · 2026-02-09
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$255,387
@ $938.92 · 2026-01-29
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$2.64M
@ $927.17 · 2026-01-27
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$4.49M
@ $923.75 · 2026-01-23
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$8.89M
@ $927.51 · 2026-01-23
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$1.62M
@ $920.62 · 2026-01-23
WALDRON JOHN E.
President
$13.69M
@ $750.30 · 2025-08-28
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$5.41M
@ $724.40 · 2025-07-25
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$4.71M
@ $712.31 · 2025-07-23
ROGERS JOHN F W
Officer
$4.31M
@ $717.39 · 2025-07-23
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.04M
@ $607.17 · 2025-05-14
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.50M
@ $622.15 · 2025-02-26
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$3.31M
@ $636.25 · 2025-01-28
HALIO CAREY
Officer and Treasurer
$2.32M
@ $636.74 · 2025-01-24
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$1.28M
@ $627.01 · 2025-01-21
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$4.76M
@ $634.69 · 2025-01-21
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$965,120
@ $624.67 · 2025-01-21
VINIAR DAVID A
Director
$3.06M
@ $612.08 · 2024-11-29
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$4.00M
@ $610.91 · 2024-11-29
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$1.77M
@ $594.51 · 2024-11-06
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$7.67M
@ $593.03 · 2024-11-06
ROGERS JOHN F W
Officer
$3.83M
@ $596.36 · 2024-11-06
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.00M
@ $500.29 · 2024-08-15
VINIAR DAVID A
Director
$2.51M
@ $502.43 · 2024-07-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TER
9
Sells (3M)
26
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $6.75M
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$61,747
@ $369.74 · 2026-06-02
POULIN SHANNON JOHN
Officer
$581,013
@ $349.17 · 2026-05-22
MATZ MARILYN
Director
$140,000
@ $350.00 · 2026-05-21
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.91M
@ $338.98 · 2026-05-15
MATZ MARILYN
Director
$271,184
@ $338.98 · 2026-05-15
DRISCOLL RYAN E
General Counsel
$256,768
@ $377.60 · 2026-05-07
MILLS REGAN
Officer
$5,475
@ $342.19 · 2026-04-08
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$195,125
@ $312.20 · 2026-04-06
MILLS REGAN
Officer
$73,302
@ $290.88 · 2026-04-02
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$187,000
@ $299.20 · 2026-03-05
MILLS REGAN
Officer
$262,302
@ $332.87 · 2026-02-25
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$166,862
@ $266.98 · 2026-02-05
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$132,406
@ $211.85 · 2026-01-05
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$223,051
@ $201.31 · 2025-12-12
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$125,000
@ $200.00 · 2025-12-05
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$199,662
@ $180.20 · 2025-11-12
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$110,656
@ $177.05 · 2025-11-05
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$160,926
@ $145.24 · 2025-10-10
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$92,438
@ $147.90 · 2025-10-06
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$70,020
@ $126.39 · 2025-09-22
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$63,710
@ $115.00 · 2025-09-12
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$75,038
@ $120.06 · 2025-09-05
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$58,724
@ $106.00 · 2025-08-12
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$66,250
@ $106.00 · 2025-08-05
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$198,244
@ $105.73 · 2025-07-30
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$58,574
@ $105.73 · 2025-07-30
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$69,350
@ $110.96 · 2025-03-03
BURNS RICHARD JOHN
Officer
$49,613
@ $111.49 · 2025-02-04
MEHTA SANJAY
Chief Financial Officer
$154,302
@ $111.49 · 2025-02-04
DRISCOLL RYAN E
General Counsel
$24,082
@ $111.49 · 2025-02-04
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$70,362
@ $112.58 · 2025-02-03
MEHTA SANJAY
Chief Financial Officer
$62,628
@ $102.00 · 2025-01-30
DRISCOLL RYAN E
Officer
$44,574
@ $102.00 · 2025-01-30
BURNS RICHARD JOHN
Officer
$181,523
@ $122.90 · 2025-01-29
MEHTA SANJAY
Chief Financial Officer
$656,040
@ $122.90 · 2025-01-29
DRISCOLL RYAN E
General Counsel
$9,340
@ $122.89 · 2025-01-29
BURNS RICHARD JOHN
Officer
$49,048
@ $120.51 · 2025-01-28
BURNS RICHARD JOHN
Officer
$49,048
@ $120.51 · 2025-01-28
MEHTA SANJAY
Chief Financial Officer
$215,592
@ $120.51 · 2025-01-28
DRISCOLL RYAN E
General Counsel
$12,895
@ $120.51 · 2025-01-28
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$400,400
@ $130.00 · 2025-01-03
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$79,225
@ $126.76 · 2025-01-02
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$400,400
@ $130.00 · 2024-12-16
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$68,775
@ $110.04 · 2024-12-02
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$69,638
@ $111.42 · 2024-11-07
BURNS RICHARD JOHN
Officer
$129,548
@ $132.19 · 2024-10-02
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$83,000
@ $132.80 · 2024-10-01
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$409,024
@ $132.80 · 2024-10-01
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$400,400
@ $130.00 · 2024-09-11
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$83,431
@ $133.49 · 2024-09-03
MEHTA SANJAY
Chief Financial Officer
$818,718
@ $133.06 · 2024-08-20
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$80,481
@ $128.77 · 2024-08-01
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$92,500
@ $148.00 · 2024-07-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GS
FearGreed
😏Greed(66/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TER
FearGreed
😏Greed(67/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (66)
TER
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (67)
View GS Full AnalysisView TER Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: GS vs TER

Is The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. or Teradyne, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, GS trades at a 56.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $2507 vs. price $1097), compared to TER's -64.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $267 vs. $438).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. or Teradyne, Inc.?

TER scores 72/100 (Wide moat), while GS scores 65/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. in financial distress?

GS's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TER scores 14.9 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. or Teradyne, Inc.?

TER earns 34.9% ROIC versus GS's 1.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s or Teradyne, Inc.'s?

TER's dividend earns a safety score of 91/100 (Very Safe), compared to GS's 79/100 (Safe). TER has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.