Compare Stocks › GS vs SRE

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) vs Sempra (SRE): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, GS is undervalued at $895, with a DCF intrinsic value of $1584 and a margin of safety of 44%. SRE is overvalued at $86, with an intrinsic value of $5 and a margin of safety of -1518%. Of the two, GS has the wider margin of safety.

GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
$894.55
VS
SRE
Sempra
$86.06

Rewards

GS
  • ★Gross margin of 81.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Share count has been reduced by 11% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.58 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
SRE
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.76 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

GS
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.25 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • ⚠5 insider sales totaling $12.2M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
SRE
  • ⚠Sempra scores only 29/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • ⚠Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • ⚠Net debt/EBITDA of 6.2x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GS
SRE
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$-27.66B
N/A
FCF Yield
-49.15%
12.86
Trailing P/E
24.87
12.07
Forward P/E
15.54
Quality & Moat
2.23%
ROIC
3.79%
17.75%
ROE
6.68%
81.29%
Gross Margin
43.99%
1.12
PEG Ratio
0.76
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
0.85
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
6.23
2.24%
Dividend Yield
3.06%
GS: 5Ties: 1SRE: 3
GSSRE

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

SRE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GS
$5.60
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$26.00B
Δ Market Cap
+$145.60B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
SRE
$2.97
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$3.06B
Δ Market Cap
+$9.10B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GS
43.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 43.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $894.55
Fair Value: $1584.20
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
SRE
1518.5% Overvalued
Price is 1518.5% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $86.06
Fair Value: $5.32
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

SRE

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GS
65/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
SRE
29/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though margin stability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GS
-2.00
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
SRE
-2.76
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GS
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 75.7%Retail & Other 23.7%
No. of Institutional Holders3,978
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
SRE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 93.7%Retail & Other 6.2%
No. of Institutional Holders1,704
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GS
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
HESS JOHN B JR.
Director
$2.00M
@ $511.68 · 2025-04-15
JOHNSON KEVIN RONALD
Director
$1.49M
@ $619.02 · 2025-01-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
SRE
0
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $576,979
KIRK JENNIFER M
Director
$93,440
@ $93.44 · 2026-03-12
WARNER CYNTHIA J
Director
$232,375
@ $92.95 · 2026-03-11
MARK RICHARD J
Director
$251,164
@ $93.30 · 2026-03-11
FERRERO PABLO A
Director
$184,496
@ $70.96 · 2025-03-17
CONESA ANDRES
Director
$100,156
@ $71.54 · 2025-03-17
YARDLEY JAMES C
Director
$350,024
@ $69.75 · 2025-03-12
MEARS MICHAEL N
Director
$67,700
@ $67.70 · 2025-03-10
WARNER CYNTHIA J
Director
$49,455
@ $70.65 · 2025-03-06
MARK RICHARD J
Director
$499,840
@ $69.81 · 2025-03-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GS
5
Sells (3M)
19
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $76.92M
LESLIE ERICKA T
Officer
$229,305
@ $917.22 · 2026-10-28
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$10.93M
@ $910.72 · 2026-10-27
LESLIE ERICKA T
Officer
$222,562
@ $890.25 · 2026-10-22
LESLIE ERICKA T
Officer
$620,280
@ $1033.80 · 2026-08-28
LESLIE ERICKA T
Officer
$184,445
@ $1053.97 · 2026-08-04
LESLIE ERICKA T
Officer
$287,951
@ $1151.80 · 2026-07-15
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$6.68M
@ $973.55 · 2026-05-14
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$13.42M
@ $939.07 · 2026-05-06
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$9.57M
@ $929.17 · 2026-05-01
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$634,927
@ $929.61 · 2026-05-01
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.23M
@ $930.70 · 2026-05-01
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$1.04M
@ $936.18 · 2026-04-23
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$1.02M
@ $919.19 · 2026-04-17
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$10.94M
@ $941.57 · 2026-02-09
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$255,387
@ $938.92 · 2026-01-29
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$2.64M
@ $927.17 · 2026-01-27
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$4.49M
@ $923.75 · 2026-01-23
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$8.89M
@ $927.51 · 2026-01-23
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$1.62M
@ $920.62 · 2026-01-23
WALDRON JOHN E.
President
$13.69M
@ $750.30 · 2025-08-28
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$5.41M
@ $724.40 · 2025-07-25
ROGERS JOHN F W
Officer
$4.31M
@ $717.39 · 2025-07-23
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$4.71M
@ $712.31 · 2025-07-23
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.04M
@ $607.17 · 2025-05-14
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.50M
@ $622.15 · 2025-02-26
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$3.31M
@ $636.25 · 2025-01-28
HALIO CAREY
Officer and Treasurer
$2.32M
@ $636.74 · 2025-01-24
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$1.28M
@ $627.01 · 2025-01-21
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$4.76M
@ $634.69 · 2025-01-21
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$965,120
@ $624.67 · 2025-01-21
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$4.00M
@ $610.91 · 2024-11-29
VINIAR DAVID A
Director
$3.06M
@ $612.08 · 2024-11-29
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$1.77M
@ $594.51 · 2024-11-06
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$7.67M
@ $593.03 · 2024-11-06
ROGERS JOHN F W
Officer
$3.83M
@ $596.36 · 2024-11-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
SRE
0
Sells (3M)
11
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $8.45M
WINN CAROLINE ANN
Officer
$724,409
@ $90.55 · 2026-06-17
FERRERO PABLO A
Director
$232,778
@ $89.53 · 2026-05-18
DAY DIANA L
Officer
$304,029
@ $92.13 · 2026-05-14
BIRD JUSTIN CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$109,066
@ $96.69 · 2026-04-01
WOLD DYAN Z.
Officer
$146,790
@ $95.38 · 2026-03-16
SEDGWICK KAREN L
Chief Financial Officer
$451,041
@ $92.58 · 2026-03-09
MARTIN JEFFREY W
Chief Executive Officer
$4.69M
@ $88.39 · 2026-01-05
SEDGWICK KAREN L
Chief Financial Officer
$698,082
@ $92.29 · 2025-11-24
WINN CAROLINE ANN
Officer
$549,540
@ $91.59 · 2025-11-19
WOLD DYAN Z.
Officer
$137,984
@ $91.38 · 2025-11-19
LARROQUE ALEXANDER LISA
Officer
$400,001
@ $92.55 · 2025-11-07
SAGARA KEVIN C
Director
$1.29M
@ $89.50 · 2025-09-29
SAGARA KEVIN C
Director
$2.43M
@ $84.21 · 2025-09-15
WINN CAROLINE ANN
Officer
$419,399
@ $82.01 · 2025-08-14
LARROQUE ALEXANDER LISA
Officer
$126,080
@ $80.00 · 2025-07-23
DAY DIANA L
Officer
$595,212
@ $74.26 · 2025-05-14
BIRD JUSTIN CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$343,096
@ $71.23 · 2025-04-01
WALL PETER R.
Officer
$580,076
@ $70.81 · 2025-03-18
LARROQUE ALEXANDER LISA
Officer
$225,717
@ $81.93 · 2025-02-11
MARTIN JEFFREY W
Chief Executive Officer
$4.13M
@ $82.94 · 2025-01-30
WALL PETER R.
Officer
$325,648
@ $83.01 · 2025-01-23
MIHALIK TREVOR I
Officer
$2.21M
@ $93.09 · 2024-11-20
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
SRE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(58/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GS
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
SRE
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
View GS Full AnalysisView SRE Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: GS vs SRE

Is The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. or Sempra more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, GS trades at a 43.5% margin of safety (intrinsic value $1584 vs. price $895), compared to SRE's -1518.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $5 vs. $86).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. or Sempra?▼

GS scores 65/100 (Narrow moat), while SRE scores 29/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. in financial distress?▼

GS's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. SRE scores 1.1 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. or Sempra?▼

SRE earns 3.8% ROIC versus GS's 2.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s or Sempra's?▼

GS's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to SRE's 43/100 (Borderline). GS has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

GS vs SRE: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io