Compare StocksGS vs SLB

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) vs SLB N.V. (SLB): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, GS is undervalued at $1097, with a DCF intrinsic value of $2507 and a margin of safety of 56%. SLB is undervalued at $48, with an intrinsic value of $176 and a margin of safety of 73%. Of the two, SLB has the wider margin of safety.

GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
$1096.56
VS
SLB
SLB N.V.
$48.09

Rewards

GS
  • Gross margin of 82.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Share count has been reduced by 11% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.58 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
SLB
  • SLB N.V. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • SLB N.V. scores 79/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

GS
  • Trailing P/E of 20.0x is 36% above the historical average of 14.7x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.25 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • 7 insider sales totaling $35.6M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
SLB
  • Gross margin of 17.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.14 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 2 out of 3 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GS
SLB
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$4.54B
N/A
FCF Yield
6.32%
20.03
Trailing P/E
21.19
16.71
Forward P/E
14.38
Quality & Moat
1.95%
ROIC
8.94%
14.55%
ROE
14.07%
82.27%
Gross Margin
17.80%
1.68
PEG Ratio
1.82
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
0.30
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.09
1.65%
Dividend Yield
2.22%
GS: 4Ties: 2SLB: 3
GSSLB

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

SLB

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GS
$5.60
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$26.00B
Δ Market Cap
+$145.60B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
SLB
$-2.44
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$7.59B
Δ Market Cap
$-18.53B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GS
56.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 56.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $1096.56
Fair Value: $2506.96
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
SLB
69.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 69.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $48.09
Fair Value: $160.02
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

SLB

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $48?

+9.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +6.0%

The market implies +9.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +6.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GS
65/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
SLB
79/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GS
-2.00
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
SLB
-2.51
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GS
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 74.6%Retail & Other 24.8%
No. of Institutional Holders3,780
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
SLB
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 92.6%Retail & Other 7.2%
No. of Institutional Holders2,253
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GS
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
HESS JOHN B JR.
Director
$2.00M
@ $511.68 · 2025-04-15
JOHNSON KEVIN RONALD
Director
$1.49M
@ $619.02 · 2025-01-17
FLAHERTY MARK A
Director
$29,545
@ $360.30 · 2024-09-27
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
SLB
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GS
7
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $92.56M
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$6.68M
@ $973.55 · 2026-05-14
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$13.42M
@ $939.07 · 2026-05-06
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$9.57M
@ $929.17 · 2026-05-01
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$634,927
@ $929.61 · 2026-05-01
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.23M
@ $930.70 · 2026-05-01
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$1.04M
@ $936.18 · 2026-04-23
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$1.02M
@ $919.19 · 2026-04-17
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$10.94M
@ $941.57 · 2026-02-09
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$255,387
@ $938.92 · 2026-01-29
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$2.64M
@ $927.17 · 2026-01-27
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$4.49M
@ $923.75 · 2026-01-23
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$8.89M
@ $927.51 · 2026-01-23
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$1.62M
@ $920.62 · 2026-01-23
WALDRON JOHN E.
President
$13.69M
@ $750.30 · 2025-08-28
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$5.41M
@ $724.40 · 2025-07-25
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$4.71M
@ $712.31 · 2025-07-23
ROGERS JOHN F W
Officer
$4.31M
@ $717.39 · 2025-07-23
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.04M
@ $607.17 · 2025-05-14
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.50M
@ $622.15 · 2025-02-26
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$3.31M
@ $636.25 · 2025-01-28
HALIO CAREY
Officer and Treasurer
$2.32M
@ $636.74 · 2025-01-24
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$1.28M
@ $627.01 · 2025-01-21
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$4.76M
@ $634.69 · 2025-01-21
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$965,120
@ $624.67 · 2025-01-21
VINIAR DAVID A
Director
$3.06M
@ $612.08 · 2024-11-29
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$4.00M
@ $610.91 · 2024-11-29
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$1.77M
@ $594.51 · 2024-11-06
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$7.67M
@ $593.03 · 2024-11-06
ROGERS JOHN F W
Officer
$3.83M
@ $596.36 · 2024-11-06
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.00M
@ $500.29 · 2024-08-15
VINIAR DAVID A
Director
$2.51M
@ $502.43 · 2024-07-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
SLB
6
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $23.08M
LE PEUCH OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$1.42M
@ $56.99 · 2026-05-27
DE LA CHEVARDIERE PATRICK
Director
$108,660
@ $54.33 · 2026-05-07
GASSEN STEVE MATTHEW
Officer
$3.00M
@ $56.18 · 2026-05-01
LE PEUCH OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$1.41M
@ $56.48 · 2026-04-29
DE LA CHEVARDIERE PATRICK
Director
$208,100
@ $52.02 · 2026-03-26
LE PEUCH OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$1.26M
@ $50.56 · 2026-03-25
LE PEUCH OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$1.30M
@ $52.00 · 2026-02-25
LE PEUCH OLIVIER
Chief Executive Officer
$1.26M
@ $50.40 · 2026-01-28
DE LA CHEVARDIERE PATRICK
Director
$201,160
@ $50.29 · 2026-01-26
BIGUET STEPHANE
Chief Financial Officer
$3.03M
@ $49.70 · 2026-01-26
RALSTON DIANNE B
Officer
$921,542
@ $49.50 · 2026-01-26
MERAD ABDELLAH
Officer
$2.98M
@ $49.70 · 2026-01-26
GUILD HOWARD
Officer
$659,420
@ $49.70 · 2026-01-26
COLEMAN PETER JOHN
Director
$197,010
@ $35.82 · 2025-11-26
BIGUET STEPHANE
Chief Financial Officer
$1.41M
@ $36.75 · 2025-11-13
MERAD ABDELLAH
Officer
$2.26M
@ $37.69 · 2025-11-11
RALSTON DIANNE B
Officer
$1.43M
@ $36.08 · 2025-09-12
DE LA CHEVARDIERE PATRICK
Director
$167,900
@ $33.58 · 2025-05-22
RAMAN APARNA
Officer
$1.06M
@ $42.28 · 2025-03-28
RENNICK GAVIN
Officer
$1.10M
@ $40.92 · 2025-02-26
RANDO BEJAR CARMEN
Officer
$223,252
@ $40.41 · 2025-01-31
MERAD ABDELLAH
Officer
$2.49M
@ $41.44 · 2025-01-29
AL MOGHARBEL KHALED
Officer
$5.43M
@ $44.09 · 2025-01-21
KASIBHATLA VIJAY
Officer
$1.10M
@ $43.94 · 2025-01-21
PRECHNER UGO
Officer
$309,435
@ $44.20 · 2025-01-21
BIGUET STEPHANE
Chief Financial Officer
$1.97M
@ $43.87 · 2025-01-21
RALSTON DIANNE B
Officer
$1.90M
@ $43.96 · 2025-01-21
GUILD HOWARD
Officer
$595,228
@ $43.87 · 2025-01-21
BIGUET STEPHANE
Chief Financial Officer
$512,294
@ $44.47 · 2024-11-13
MERAD ABDELLAH
Officer
$2.51M
@ $41.90 · 2024-10-24
DE LA CHEVARDIERE PATRICK
Director
$430,055
@ $43.01 · 2024-09-04
AL MOGHARBEL KHALED
Officer
$6.06M
@ $50.19 · 2024-07-22
BIGUET STEPHANE
Chief Financial Officer
$2.50M
@ $49.94 · 2024-07-22
KASIBHATLA VIJAY
Officer
$492,900
@ $49.29 · 2024-07-22
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GS
FearGreed
😏Greed(66/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
SLB
FearGreed
😐Neutral(42/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (66)
SLB
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (42)
View GS Full AnalysisView SLB Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: GS vs SLB

Is The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. or SLB N.V. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, SLB trades at a 72.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $176 vs. price $48), compared to GS's 56.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $2507 vs. $1097).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. or SLB N.V.?

SLB scores 79/100 (Wide moat), while GS scores 65/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. in financial distress?

GS's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. SLB scores 2.8 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. or SLB N.V.?

SLB earns 8.9% ROIC versus GS's 1.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s or SLB N.V.'s?

SLB's dividend earns a safety score of 85/100 (Very Safe), compared to GS's 79/100 (Safe). SLB has raised its dividend for 0 consecutive years.

GS vs SLB: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io