Compare StocksGS vs PCG

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) vs PG&E Corporation (PCG)

GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
$809.50
VS
PCG
PG&E Corporation
$18.19

Rewards

GS
  • Gross margin of 82.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Share count has been reduced by 11% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.60 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
PCG

    Risks

    GS
    • The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. scores only 26/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • High leverage (5.96x debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.25 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    PCG
    • Share count has increased by 11% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.42 of market value — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 6.1x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    GS
    PCG
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $-3.41B
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    -8.54%
    15.77
    Trailing P/E
    15.42
    12.45
    Forward P/E
    10.08
    Quality & Moat
    2.06%
    ROIC
    4.46%
    13.00%
    ROE
    7.91%
    82.88%
    Gross Margin
    39.58%
    0.91
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    5.96
    Debt / Equity
    1.87
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    N/A
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    6.07
    2.22%
    Dividend Yield
    1.10%
    GS: 3Ties: 2PCG: 3
    GSPCG

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    GS

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    PCG

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    GS
    $5.60
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $26.00B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$145.60B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    PCG
    $0.42
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Destroyer
    Σ Retained
    $7.07B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$3.00B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    GS
    65.1% Margin of Safety
    Price is 65.1% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $809.50
    Fair Value: $2319.70
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    PCG
    843.1% Overvalued
    Price is 843.1% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $18.19
    Fair Value: $1.93
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    GS

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    PCG

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    GS
    26/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    PCG
    33/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    GS
    -2.00
    Possible Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    PCG
    -2.69
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    GS
    Insiders 0.5%Institutions 75.7%Retail & Other 23.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,730
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    PCG
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 99.3%Retail & Other 0.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,202
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    GS
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $2.00M
    HESS JOHN B JR.
    Director
    $2.00M
    @ $511.68 · 2025-04-15
    JOHNSON KEVIN RONALD
    Director
    $1.49M
    @ $619.02 · 2025-01-17
    FLAHERTY MARK A
    Director
    $29,545
    @ $360.30 · 2024-09-27
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    PCG
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $119,700
    LARSEN JOHN O
    Director
    $119,700
    @ $15.96 · 2025-11-04
    DENAULT LEO PAUL
    Director
    $100,548
    @ $15.96 · 2025-03-11
    HERNANDEZ CARLOS M.
    Director
    $49,989
    @ $15.91 · 2025-02-25
    BAHRI RAJAT
    Director
    $50,054
    @ $15.79 · 2025-02-25
    DENECOUR JESSICA L
    Director
    $21,269
    @ $15.79 · 2025-02-21
    HARRIS ARNO LOCKHEART
    Director
    $100,052
    @ $15.66 · 2025-02-20
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    GS
    6
    Sells (3M)
    11
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $59.99M
    COLEMAN DENIS P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $10.94M
    @ $941.57 · 2026-02-09
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $255,387
    @ $938.92 · 2026-01-29
    HALIO CAREY
    Officer
    $2.64M
    @ $927.17 · 2026-01-27
    FREDMAN SHEARA J.
    Officer
    $4.49M
    @ $923.75 · 2026-01-23
    RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
    General Counsel
    $8.89M
    @ $927.51 · 2026-01-23
    HALIO CAREY
    Officer
    $1.62M
    @ $920.62 · 2026-01-23
    WALDRON JOHN E.
    President
    $13.69M
    @ $750.30 · 2025-08-28
    COLEMAN DENIS P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $5.41M
    @ $724.40 · 2025-07-25
    ROGERS JOHN F W
    Officer
    $4.31M
    @ $717.39 · 2025-07-23
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.71M
    @ $712.31 · 2025-07-23
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.04M
    @ $607.17 · 2025-05-14
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.50M
    @ $622.15 · 2025-02-26
    GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
    Officer
    $3.31M
    @ $636.25 · 2025-01-28
    HALIO CAREY
    Officer and Treasurer
    $2.32M
    @ $636.74 · 2025-01-24
    FREDMAN SHEARA J.
    Officer
    $1.28M
    @ $627.01 · 2025-01-21
    RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
    General Counsel
    $4.76M
    @ $634.69 · 2025-01-21
    HALIO CAREY
    Officer
    $965,120
    @ $624.67 · 2025-01-21
    VINIAR DAVID A
    Director
    $3.06M
    @ $612.08 · 2024-11-29
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.00M
    @ $610.91 · 2024-11-29
    FREDMAN SHEARA J.
    Officer
    $1.77M
    @ $594.51 · 2024-11-06
    COLEMAN DENIS P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $7.67M
    @ $593.03 · 2024-11-06
    ROGERS JOHN F W
    Officer
    $3.83M
    @ $596.36 · 2024-11-06
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.00M
    @ $500.29 · 2024-08-15
    VINIAR DAVID A
    Director
    $2.51M
    @ $502.43 · 2024-07-16
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.02M
    @ $457.32 · 2024-05-10
    VINIAR DAVID A
    Director
    $2.16M
    @ $432.25 · 2024-04-29
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    PCG
    3
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $2.68M
    COOPER KERRY WHORTON
    Director
    $46,700
    @ $18.68 · 2026-03-17
    PETERMAN CARLA J
    Officer
    $582,002
    @ $18.31 · 2026-03-16
    SINGH SUMEET
    Officer
    $1.02M
    @ $18.32 · 2026-03-05
    GLICKMAN JASON M.
    Divisional Officer
    $470,094
    @ $15.95 · 2025-10-30
    PETERMAN CARLA J
    Officer
    $562,579
    @ $17.30 · 2025-04-29
    GLICKMAN JASON M.
    Divisional Officer
    $632,155
    @ $15.71 · 2025-03-10
    WILLIAMS STEPHANIE N.
    Officer
    $242,891
    @ $16.21 · 2025-03-06
    SANTOS MARLENE
    Officer of Subsidiary Company
    $2.06M
    @ $16.37 · 2025-03-04
    PETERMAN CARLA J
    Officer
    $532,369
    @ $16.37 · 2025-03-04
    WILLIAMS STEPHANIE N.
    Officer
    $707,170
    @ $18.32 · 2024-08-15
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    GS
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(48/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    PCG
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(57/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    GS
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
    PCG
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
    View GS Full AnalysisView PCG Full Analysis