Compare Stocks › GS vs MTD

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) vs Mettler-Toledo International Inc. (MTD): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, GS is undervalued at $895, with a DCF intrinsic value of $1584 and a margin of safety of 44%. MTD is overvalued at $1675, with an intrinsic value of $939 and a margin of safety of -78%. Of the two, GS has the wider margin of safety.

GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
$894.55
VS
MTD
Mettler-Toledo International Inc.
$1674.81

Rewards

GS
  • ★Gross margin of 81.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Share count has been reduced by 11% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.58 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
MTD
  • ★Mettler-Toledo International Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 60.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Mettler-Toledo International Inc. scores 95/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

GS
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.25 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • ⚠5 insider sales totaling $12.2M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
MTD
  • ⚠Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.07 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 2.1% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠PEG ratio of 3.11 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GS
MTD
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$693.59M
N/A
FCF Yield
2.07%
12.86
Trailing P/E
37.75
12.07
Forward P/E
32.36
Quality & Moat
2.23%
ROIC
47.39%
17.75%
ROE
6778.39%
81.29%
Gross Margin
60.26%
1.12
PEG Ratio
3.11
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
162.68
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.64
2.24%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
GS: 6Ties: 1MTD: 2
GSMTD

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

MTD

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GS
$5.60
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$26.00B
Δ Market Cap
+$145.60B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MTD
$-1.43
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$2.52B
Δ Market Cap
$-3.62B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GS
43.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 43.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $894.55
Fair Value: $1584.20
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MTD
78.5% Overvalued
Price is 78.5% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $1674.81
Fair Value: $938.51
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

MTD

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $1675?

+17.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +20.6%

The market implies +17.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +20.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GS
65/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MTD
95/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GS
-2.00
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MTD
-2.43
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GS
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 75.7%Retail & Other 23.7%
No. of Institutional Holders3,978
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MTD
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 112.2%
No. of Institutional Holders1,230
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GS
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
HESS JOHN B JR.
Director
$2.00M
@ $511.68 · 2025-04-15
JOHNSON KEVIN RONALD
Director
$1.49M
@ $619.02 · 2025-01-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MTD
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GS
5
Sells (3M)
19
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $76.92M
LESLIE ERICKA T
Officer
$229,305
@ $917.22 · 2026-10-28
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$10.93M
@ $910.72 · 2026-10-27
LESLIE ERICKA T
Officer
$222,562
@ $890.25 · 2026-10-22
LESLIE ERICKA T
Officer
$620,280
@ $1033.80 · 2026-08-28
LESLIE ERICKA T
Officer
$184,445
@ $1053.97 · 2026-08-04
LESLIE ERICKA T
Officer
$287,951
@ $1151.80 · 2026-07-15
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$6.68M
@ $973.55 · 2026-05-14
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$13.42M
@ $939.07 · 2026-05-06
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$9.57M
@ $929.17 · 2026-05-01
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$634,927
@ $929.61 · 2026-05-01
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.23M
@ $930.70 · 2026-05-01
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$1.04M
@ $936.18 · 2026-04-23
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$1.02M
@ $919.19 · 2026-04-17
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$10.94M
@ $941.57 · 2026-02-09
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$255,387
@ $938.92 · 2026-01-29
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$2.64M
@ $927.17 · 2026-01-27
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$4.49M
@ $923.75 · 2026-01-23
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$8.89M
@ $927.51 · 2026-01-23
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$1.62M
@ $920.62 · 2026-01-23
WALDRON JOHN E.
President
$13.69M
@ $750.30 · 2025-08-28
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$5.41M
@ $724.40 · 2025-07-25
ROGERS JOHN F W
Officer
$4.31M
@ $717.39 · 2025-07-23
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$4.71M
@ $712.31 · 2025-07-23
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.04M
@ $607.17 · 2025-05-14
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.50M
@ $622.15 · 2025-02-26
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$3.31M
@ $636.25 · 2025-01-28
HALIO CAREY
Officer and Treasurer
$2.32M
@ $636.74 · 2025-01-24
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$1.28M
@ $627.01 · 2025-01-21
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$4.76M
@ $634.69 · 2025-01-21
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$965,120
@ $624.67 · 2025-01-21
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$4.00M
@ $610.91 · 2024-11-29
VINIAR DAVID A
Director
$3.06M
@ $612.08 · 2024-11-29
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$1.77M
@ $594.51 · 2024-11-06
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$7.67M
@ $593.03 · 2024-11-06
ROGERS JOHN F W
Officer
$3.83M
@ $596.36 · 2024-11-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MTD
2
Sells (3M)
13
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $35.90M
KALTENBACH PATRICK
Chief Executive Officer
$1.34M
@ $1425.00 · 2026-08-27
SALICE THOMAS P
Director
$600,651
@ $1440.41 · 2026-08-05
KELLER GERRY
Officer
$342,514
@ $1427.14 · 2026-08-03
VADALA SHAWN P.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.21M
@ $1432.00 · 2026-08-03
SALICE THOMAS P
Director
$599,517
@ $1444.62 · 2026-08-03
VADALA SHAWN P.
Chief Financial Officer
$1.13M
@ $1410.12 · 2026-02-10
GUERONNIERE MARC DE LA
Officer
$9.01M
@ $1488.18 · 2025-11-25
VADALA SHAWN P.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.00M
@ $1481.14 · 2025-11-25
KELLER GERRY
Officer
$334,785
@ $1418.58 · 2025-11-21
KALTENBACH PATRICK
Chief Executive Officer
$2.92M
@ $1462.50 · 2025-11-12
GUERONNIERE MARC DE LA
Officer
$9.98M
@ $1450.00 · 2025-11-11
VADALA SHAWN P.
Chief Financial Officer
$2.76M
@ $1455.52 · 2025-11-11
FINNEY ELISHA W
Director
$679,512
@ $1433.57 · 2025-11-10
VADALA SHAWN P.
Chief Financial Officer
$397,500
@ $1325.00 · 2025-08-19
KELLER GERRY
Officer
$215,926
@ $1308.64 · 2025-08-14
SALICE THOMAS P
Director
$1.38M
@ $1300.90 · 2025-08-13
VADALA SHAWN P.
Chief Financial Officer
$376,227
@ $1254.09 · 2025-08-08
KELLY MICHAEL A
Director
$1.23M
@ $1159.93 · 2025-05-28
MAGLOTH CHRISTIAN
Officer
$1.04M
@ $1313.69 · 2025-02-24
GUERONNIERE MARC DE LA
Officer
$1.18M
@ $1331.89 · 2025-02-11
KELLER GERRY
Officer
$810,806
@ $1351.34 · 2025-02-10
KELLER GERRY
Officer
$175,573
@ $1254.09 · 2024-12-03
FINNEY ELISHA W
Director
$99,693
@ $1311.75 · 2024-11-11
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MTD
FearGreed
😏Greed(69/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GS
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
MTD
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (69)
View GS Full AnalysisView MTD Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: GS vs MTD

Is The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. or Mettler-Toledo International Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, GS trades at a 43.5% margin of safety (intrinsic value $1584 vs. price $895), compared to MTD's -78.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $939 vs. $1675).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. or Mettler-Toledo International Inc.?▼

MTD scores 95/100 (Wide moat), while GS scores 65/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. in financial distress?▼

GS's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. MTD scores 10.2 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. or Mettler-Toledo International Inc.?▼

MTD earns 47.4% ROIC versus GS's 2.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

GS vs MTD: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io