Compare Stocks › GS vs MAA

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) vs Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. (MAA): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, GS is undervalued at $895, with a DCF intrinsic value of $1584 and a margin of safety of 44%. MAA is overvalued at $117, with an intrinsic value of $42 and a margin of safety of -177%. Of the two, GS has the wider margin of safety.

GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
$894.55
VS
MAA
Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.
$117.21

Rewards

GS
  • ★Gross margin of 81.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Share count has been reduced by 11% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.58 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
MAA

    Risks

    GS
    • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.25 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    • ⚠5 insider sales totaling $12.2M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
    MAA
    • ⚠FCF yield of 6.7% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    • ⚠PEG ratio of 7.03 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • ⚠Net debt/EBITDA of 4.7x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    GS
    MAA
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $928.55M
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    6.66%
    12.86
    Trailing P/E
    35.52
    12.07
    Forward P/E
    35.74
    Quality & Moat
    2.23%
    ROIC
    3.88%
    17.75%
    ROE
    6.91%
    81.29%
    Gross Margin
    58.22%
    1.12
    PEG Ratio
    7.03
    Balance Sheet Safety
    Net cash
    Net Debt / Equity
    1.08
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    N/A
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    4.72
    2.24%
    Dividend Yield
    5.22%
    GS: 6Ties: 1MAA: 2
    GSMAA

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    GS

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    MAA

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    GS
    $5.60
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $26.00B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$145.60B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    MAA
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-531.4M
    Δ Market Cap
    $-1.89B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    GS
    43.5% Margin of Safety
    Price is 43.5% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $894.55
    Fair Value: $1584.20
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    MAA
    177.4% Overvalued
    Price is 177.4% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $117.21
    Fair Value: $42.26
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    GS

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    MAA

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $117?

    +12.2%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +8.6%

    The market implies +12.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    GS
    65/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    MAA
    51/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    GS
    -2.00
    Possible Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    MAA
    -2.70
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    GS
    Insiders 0.6%Institutions 75.7%Retail & Other 23.7%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,978
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    MAA
    Insiders 0.5%Institutions 100.9%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,084
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    GS
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    HESS JOHN B JR.
    Director
    $2.00M
    @ $511.68 · 2025-04-15
    JOHNSON KEVIN RONALD
    Director
    $1.49M
    @ $619.02 · 2025-01-17
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    MAA
    0
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $241,327
    FISCHER TAMARA D.
    Director
    $141,400
    @ $128.55 · 2026-05-21
    HILL ADRIAN
    Chief Investment Officer
    $99,927
    @ $131.83 · 2025-12-12
    BOLTON HAROLD ERIC JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $74,769
    @ $129.36 · 2025-10-31
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    GS
    5
    Sells (3M)
    19
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $76.92M
    LESLIE ERICKA T
    Officer
    $229,305
    @ $917.22 · 2026-10-28
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $10.93M
    @ $910.72 · 2026-10-27
    LESLIE ERICKA T
    Officer
    $222,562
    @ $890.25 · 2026-10-22
    LESLIE ERICKA T
    Officer
    $620,280
    @ $1033.80 · 2026-08-28
    LESLIE ERICKA T
    Officer
    $184,445
    @ $1053.97 · 2026-08-04
    LESLIE ERICKA T
    Officer
    $287,951
    @ $1151.80 · 2026-07-15
    COLEMAN DENIS P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $6.68M
    @ $973.55 · 2026-05-14
    RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
    General Counsel
    $13.42M
    @ $939.07 · 2026-05-06
    FREDMAN SHEARA J.
    Officer
    $9.57M
    @ $929.17 · 2026-05-01
    RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
    General Counsel
    $634,927
    @ $929.61 · 2026-05-01
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.23M
    @ $930.70 · 2026-05-01
    GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
    Officer
    $1.04M
    @ $936.18 · 2026-04-23
    GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
    Officer
    $1.02M
    @ $919.19 · 2026-04-17
    COLEMAN DENIS P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $10.94M
    @ $941.57 · 2026-02-09
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $255,387
    @ $938.92 · 2026-01-29
    HALIO CAREY
    Officer
    $2.64M
    @ $927.17 · 2026-01-27
    FREDMAN SHEARA J.
    Officer
    $4.49M
    @ $923.75 · 2026-01-23
    RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
    General Counsel
    $8.89M
    @ $927.51 · 2026-01-23
    HALIO CAREY
    Officer
    $1.62M
    @ $920.62 · 2026-01-23
    WALDRON JOHN E.
    President
    $13.69M
    @ $750.30 · 2025-08-28
    COLEMAN DENIS P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $5.41M
    @ $724.40 · 2025-07-25
    ROGERS JOHN F W
    Officer
    $4.31M
    @ $717.39 · 2025-07-23
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.71M
    @ $712.31 · 2025-07-23
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.04M
    @ $607.17 · 2025-05-14
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.50M
    @ $622.15 · 2025-02-26
    GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
    Officer
    $3.31M
    @ $636.25 · 2025-01-28
    HALIO CAREY
    Officer and Treasurer
    $2.32M
    @ $636.74 · 2025-01-24
    FREDMAN SHEARA J.
    Officer
    $1.28M
    @ $627.01 · 2025-01-21
    RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
    General Counsel
    $4.76M
    @ $634.69 · 2025-01-21
    HALIO CAREY
    Officer
    $965,120
    @ $624.67 · 2025-01-21
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.00M
    @ $610.91 · 2024-11-29
    VINIAR DAVID A
    Director
    $3.06M
    @ $612.08 · 2024-11-29
    FREDMAN SHEARA J.
    Officer
    $1.77M
    @ $594.51 · 2024-11-06
    COLEMAN DENIS P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $7.67M
    @ $593.03 · 2024-11-06
    ROGERS JOHN F W
    Officer
    $3.83M
    @ $596.36 · 2024-11-06
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    MAA
    0
    Sells (3M)
    14
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.16M
    FRENCH JAMES BARTON
    Officer
    $45,842
    @ $130.98 · 2026-05-08
    CARPENTER MELANIE
    Officer
    $91,214
    @ $124.78 · 2026-04-06
    ARGO TIMOTHY
    Officer
    $22,826
    @ $124.73 · 2026-04-06
    HOLDER AUBREY CLAY
    Chief Financial Officer
    $18,086
    @ $124.73 · 2026-04-06
    FAIRBANKS AMBER
    Officer
    $88,683
    @ $124.73 · 2026-04-06
    CARPENTER MELANIE
    Officer
    $19,572
    @ $134.98 · 2026-01-08
    ARGO TIMOTHY
    Officer
    $7,154
    @ $134.98 · 2026-01-08
    HOLDER AUBREY CLAY
    Chief Financial Officer
    $9,854
    @ $134.99 · 2026-01-08
    FAIRBANKS AMBER
    Officer
    $24,971
    @ $134.98 · 2026-01-08
    CARPENTER MELANIE
    Officer
    $39,585
    @ $136.50 · 2026-01-06
    ARGO TIMOTHY
    Officer
    $7,917
    @ $136.50 · 2026-01-06
    HOLDER AUBREY CLAY
    Chief Financial Officer
    $6,962
    @ $136.51 · 2026-01-06
    FAIRBANKS AMBER
    Officer
    $31,804
    @ $136.50 · 2026-01-06
    DELPRIORE ROBERT J
    General Counsel
    $750,036
    @ $138.23 · 2026-01-02
    FAIRBANKS AMBER
    Officer
    $28,865
    @ $166.85 · 2025-05-02
    FAIRBANKS AMBER
    Officer
    $30,052
    @ $150.26 · 2025-04-08
    CARPENTER MELANIE
    Officer
    $47,228
    @ $149.93 · 2025-04-07
    ARGO TIMOTHY
    Officer
    $6,477
    @ $143.93 · 2025-04-07
    BOLTON HAROLD ERIC JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $396,265
    @ $149.93 · 2025-04-07
    DELPRIORE ROBERT J
    General Counsel
    $191,176
    @ $166.24 · 2025-04-03
    CARPENTER MELANIE
    Officer
    $78,465
    @ $166.24 · 2025-04-03
    ARGO TIMOTHY
    Officer
    $15,627
    @ $166.24 · 2025-04-03
    HOLDER AUBREY CLAY
    Chief Financial Officer
    $4,655
    @ $166.25 · 2025-04-03
    BOLTON HAROLD ERIC JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $724,474
    @ $166.24 · 2025-04-03
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    GS
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(48/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    MAA
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(45/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    GS
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
    MAA
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (45)
    View GS Full AnalysisView MAA Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: GS vs MAA

    Is The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. or Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, GS trades at a 43.5% margin of safety (intrinsic value $1584 vs. price $895), compared to MAA's -177.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $42 vs. $117).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. or Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.?▼

    GS scores 65/100 (Narrow moat), while MAA scores 51/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. in financial distress?▼

    GS's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. MAA scores 1.6 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. or Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.?▼

    MAA earns 3.9% ROIC versus GS's 2.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s or Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.'s?▼

    GS's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to MAA's 24/100 (Unsafe). GS has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

    GS vs MAA: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io