Compare StocksGS vs LULU

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) vs lululemon athletica inc. (LULU)

GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
$809.50
VS
LULU
lululemon athletica inc.
$165.57

Rewards

GS
  • Gross margin of 82.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Share count has been reduced by 11% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.60 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
LULU
  • lululemon athletica inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • lululemon athletica inc. scores 92/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 16.8% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

GS
  • The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. scores only 26/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • High leverage (5.96x debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.25 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
LULU

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    GS
    LULU
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $1.58B
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    8.06%
    15.77
    Trailing P/E
    11.51
    12.45
    Forward P/E
    12.36
    Quality & Moat
    2.06%
    ROIC
    28.95%
    13.00%
    ROE
    31.83%
    82.88%
    Gross Margin
    56.60%
    0.91
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    5.96
    Debt / Equity
    0.36
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    N/A
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    -0.00
    2.22%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    GS: 1Ties: 2LULU: 4
    GSLULU

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    GS

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    LULU

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    GS
    $5.60
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $26.00B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$145.60B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    LULU
    $-3.78
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $4.22B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-15.97B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    GS
    65.1% Margin of Safety
    Price is 65.1% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $809.50
    Fair Value: $2319.70
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    LULU
    51.8% Margin of Safety
    Price is 51.8% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $165.57
    Fair Value: $343.57
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    GS

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    LULU

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $166?

    -0.8%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +1.2%

    The market implies -0.8% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +1.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    GS
    26/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    LULU
    92/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    GS
    -2.00
    Possible Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    LULU
    -2.49
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    GS
    Insiders 0.5%Institutions 75.7%Retail & Other 23.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,730
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    LULU
    Insiders 4.7%Institutions 83.4%Retail & Other 11.9%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,449
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    GS
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $2.00M
    HESS JOHN B JR.
    Director
    $2.00M
    @ $511.68 · 2025-04-15
    JOHNSON KEVIN RONALD
    Director
    $1.49M
    @ $619.02 · 2025-01-17
    FLAHERTY MARK A
    Director
    $29,545
    @ $360.30 · 2024-09-27
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    LULU
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    MCDONALD CALVIN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.04M
    @ $260.00 · 2024-09-03
    MORFITT MARTHA A M
    Director
    $1.44M
    @ $389.05 · 2024-03-27
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    GS
    6
    Sells (3M)
    11
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $59.99M
    COLEMAN DENIS P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $10.94M
    @ $941.57 · 2026-02-09
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $255,387
    @ $938.92 · 2026-01-29
    HALIO CAREY
    Officer
    $2.64M
    @ $927.17 · 2026-01-27
    FREDMAN SHEARA J.
    Officer
    $4.49M
    @ $923.75 · 2026-01-23
    RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
    General Counsel
    $8.89M
    @ $927.51 · 2026-01-23
    HALIO CAREY
    Officer
    $1.62M
    @ $920.62 · 2026-01-23
    WALDRON JOHN E.
    President
    $13.69M
    @ $750.30 · 2025-08-28
    COLEMAN DENIS P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $5.41M
    @ $724.40 · 2025-07-25
    ROGERS JOHN F W
    Officer
    $4.31M
    @ $717.39 · 2025-07-23
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.71M
    @ $712.31 · 2025-07-23
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.04M
    @ $607.17 · 2025-05-14
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.50M
    @ $622.15 · 2025-02-26
    GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
    Officer
    $3.31M
    @ $636.25 · 2025-01-28
    HALIO CAREY
    Officer and Treasurer
    $2.32M
    @ $636.74 · 2025-01-24
    FREDMAN SHEARA J.
    Officer
    $1.28M
    @ $627.01 · 2025-01-21
    RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
    General Counsel
    $4.76M
    @ $634.69 · 2025-01-21
    HALIO CAREY
    Officer
    $965,120
    @ $624.67 · 2025-01-21
    VINIAR DAVID A
    Director
    $3.06M
    @ $612.08 · 2024-11-29
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.00M
    @ $610.91 · 2024-11-29
    FREDMAN SHEARA J.
    Officer
    $1.77M
    @ $594.51 · 2024-11-06
    COLEMAN DENIS P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $7.67M
    @ $593.03 · 2024-11-06
    ROGERS JOHN F W
    Officer
    $3.83M
    @ $596.36 · 2024-11-06
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.00M
    @ $500.29 · 2024-08-15
    VINIAR DAVID A
    Director
    $2.51M
    @ $502.43 · 2024-07-16
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.02M
    @ $457.32 · 2024-05-10
    VINIAR DAVID A
    Director
    $2.16M
    @ $432.25 · 2024-04-29
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    LULU
    1
    Sells (3M)
    4
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $9.80M
    FRANK MEGHAN
    Chief Financial Officer
    $561,821
    @ $211.37 · 2025-12-30
    BURGOYNE CELESTE
    Officer
    $2.76M
    @ $204.00 · 2025-12-16
    NEUBURGER NICOLE
    Officer
    $109,470
    @ $178.00 · 2025-09-30
    MCDONALD CALVIN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $6.38M
    @ $235.69 · 2025-06-27
    NEUBURGER NICOLE
    Officer
    $782,735
    @ $387.11 · 2024-12-26
    BURGOYNE CELESTE
    Officer
    $10.09M
    @ $405.54 · 2024-12-09
    NEUBURGER NICOLE
    Officer
    $131,021
    @ $269.59 · 2024-09-26
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    GS
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(48/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    LULU
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(30/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    GS
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
    LULU
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (30)
    View GS Full AnalysisView LULU Full Analysis