Compare StocksGRMN vs V

Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) vs Visa Inc. (V): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, GRMN is overvalued at $279, with a DCF intrinsic value of $208 and a margin of safety of -34%. V is overvalued at $370, with an intrinsic value of $316 and a margin of safety of -17%. Of the two, V has the wider margin of safety.

GRMN
Garmin Ltd.
$279.15
VS
V
Visa Inc.
$370.14

Rewards

GRMN
  • Garmin Ltd. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 60.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Garmin Ltd. scores 91/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
V
  • Visa Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 97.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Visa Inc. scores 99/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

GRMN
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • FCF yield of 2.5% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 28.8x is 30% above the historical average of 22.2x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
V
  • FCF yield of 3.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • 9 insider sales totaling $44.9M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GRMN
V
Valuation
$1.36B
Free Cash Flow
$20.40B
2.53%
FCF Yield
2.95%
28.81
Trailing P/E
31.47
25.37
Forward P/E
24.67
Quality & Moat
19.93%
ROIC
39.37%
21.89%
ROE
61.19%
60.08%
Gross Margin
97.72%
2.94
PEG Ratio
1.68
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
0.29
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-1.06
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.32
1.52%
Dividend Yield
0.72%
GRMN: 4Ties: 2V: 6
GRMNV

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GRMN

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

V

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GRMN
$8.32
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.57B
Δ Market Cap
+$21.39B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
V
$5.47
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$44.47B
Δ Market Cap
+$243.21B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GRMN
33.9% Overvalued
Price is 33.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $279.15
Fair Value: $208.46
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
V
17.1% Overvalued
Price is 17.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $370.14
Fair Value: $316.13
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GRMN

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $279?

+13.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +16.3%

The market implies +13.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +16.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

V

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $370?

+15.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +15.1%

The market implies +15.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GRMN
91/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
V
99/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GRMN
-2.26
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
V
-2.50
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GRMN
Insiders 14.7%Institutions 58.3%Retail & Other 27.0%
No. of Institutional Holders1,426
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
V
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 90.2%Retail & Other 9.7%
No. of Institutional Holders5,988
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GRMN
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
V
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GRMN
4
Sells (3M)
20
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.04M
WANG CHENG-WEI
Officer
$2.98M
@ $299.36 · 2026-08-18
MAXFIELD JOSHUA H.
General Counsel
$335,385
@ $291.13 · 2026-07-31
BIDDLECOMBE SEAN MICHAEL
Officer
$288,779
@ $292.88 · 2026-07-31
PEMBLE CLIFTON A
Chief Executive Officer
$1.21M
@ $300.00 · 2026-07-29
HARTNETT JOSEPH J
Director
$169,476
@ $263.57 · 2026-06-09
HARTNETT JOSEPH J
Director
$151,806
@ $236.09 · 2026-06-09
BOESSEN DOUGLAS G
Chief Financial Officer
$475,812
@ $237.91 · 2026-06-05
MINARD LAURIE A
Officer
$262,365
@ $242.03 · 2026-05-08
LINK EDWARD J.
Officer
$310,647
@ $243.64 · 2026-03-10
MUNN MATTHEW W.
Officer
$1.32M
@ $250.97 · 2026-02-26
LYMAN SUSAN
Officer
$956,258
@ $251.32 · 2026-02-26
DESBOIS PATRICK
Chief Operating Officer
$1.68M
@ $251.65 · 2026-02-26
PEMBLE CLIFTON A
Chief Executive Officer
$5.01M
@ $251.58 · 2026-02-26
BOESSEN DOUGLAS G
Chief Financial Officer
$877,541
@ $251.66 · 2026-02-26
MINARD LAURIE A
Officer
$206,976
@ $247.28 · 2026-02-23
BIDDLECOMBE SEAN MICHAEL
Officer
$257,854
@ $240.76 · 2026-02-20
BOESSEN DOUGLAS G
Chief Financial Officer
$103,181
@ $215.41 · 2026-02-13
DESBOIS PATRICK
Chief Operating Officer
$773,868
@ $210.40 · 2026-01-07
PEMBLE CLIFTON A
Chief Executive Officer
$2.15M
@ $206.23 · 2025-12-16
BOESSEN DOUGLAS G
Chief Financial Officer
$512,562
@ $206.26 · 2025-12-16
WANG CHENG-WEI
Officer
$2.37M
@ $232.48 · 2025-08-27
LINK EDWARD J.
Officer
$395,140
@ $230.00 · 2025-08-11
MINARD LAURIE A
Officer
$181,010
@ $230.00 · 2025-08-06
BOESSEN DOUGLAS G
Chief Financial Officer
$399,685
@ $215.00 · 2025-07-03
PEMBLE CLIFTON A
Chief Executive Officer
$1.61M
@ $203.25 · 2025-06-16
LYMAN SUSAN
Officer
$609,677
@ $215.51 · 2025-03-10
MUNN MATTHEW W.
Officer
$1.04M
@ $225.31 · 2025-02-28
BOESSEN DOUGLAS G
Chief Financial Officer
$625,969
@ $226.55 · 2025-02-28
DESBOIS PATRICK
Chief Operating Officer
$1.57M
@ $227.15 · 2025-02-26
PEMBLE CLIFTON A
Chief Executive Officer
$1.64M
@ $227.14 · 2025-02-26
MINARD LAURIE A
Officer
$177,952
@ $226.11 · 2025-02-24
BOESSEN DOUGLAS G
Chief Financial Officer
$366,277
@ $207.99 · 2024-12-20
BOESSEN DOUGLAS G
Chief Financial Officer
$193,655
@ $216.62 · 2024-12-16
PEMBLE CLIFTON A
Chief Executive Officer
$2.20M
@ $216.58 · 2024-12-16
BIDDLECOMBE SEAN MICHAEL
Officer
$123,328
@ $210.10 · 2024-11-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
V
9
Sells (3M)
22
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $87.76M
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$687,691
@ $368.34 · 2026-09-09
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.23M
@ $379.65 · 2026-09-01
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$773,378
@ $381.35 · 2026-08-31
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$6.65M
@ $371.00 · 2026-08-21
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.16M
@ $367.87 · 2026-08-21
MAHON TULLIER KELLY
Officer
$20.90M
@ $364.97 · 2026-07-30
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$729,720
@ $360.00 · 2026-07-02
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.61M
@ $343.99 · 2026-07-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$7.13M
@ $340.25 · 2026-06-29
SUH CHRIS
Chief Financial Officer
$3.46M
@ $324.81 · 2026-05-12
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$10.70M
@ $340.14 · 2026-04-29
CARNEY LLOYD
Director
$201,253
@ $309.62 · 2026-03-11
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.66M
@ $349.18 · 2026-01-02
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$699,315
@ $345.00 · 2025-12-11
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.57M
@ $340.07 · 2025-12-11
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$2.50M
@ $331.45 · 2025-12-02
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$7.84M
@ $330.14 · 2025-12-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$707,917
@ $325.93 · 2025-11-21
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$2.08M
@ $330.00 · 2025-11-21
CARNEY LLOYD
Director
$302,832
@ $336.48 · 2025-11-04
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.58M
@ $341.00 · 2025-11-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.59M
@ $342.30 · 2025-10-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.65M
@ $348.57 · 2025-09-02
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$697,329
@ $344.02 · 2025-08-18
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.60M
@ $343.13 · 2025-08-14
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.05M
@ $353.82 · 2025-07-01
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$4.36M
@ $375.00 · 2025-06-11
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$17.10M
@ $370.00 · 2025-06-05
TANEJA RAJAT
President
$18.44M
@ $368.87 · 2025-06-05
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.13M
@ $362.77 · 2025-06-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$6.32M
@ $357.45 · 2025-05-12
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$5.26M
@ $355.04 · 2025-05-08
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$889,868
@ $345.58 · 2025-05-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.98M
@ $345.58 · 2025-05-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.02M
@ $350.44 · 2025-04-01
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$13.40M
@ $340.41 · 2025-03-19
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$12.88M
@ $327.20 · 2025-03-14
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.13M
@ $363.00 · 2025-03-03
ANDRESKI PETER M
Officer
$815,314
@ $349.62 · 2025-02-07
MAHON TULLIER KELLY
Officer
$11.80M
@ $349.77 · 2025-02-07
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$874,480
@ $340.00 · 2025-02-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.93M
@ $340.00 · 2025-02-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.74M
@ $317.78 · 2025-01-02
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$11.15M
@ $315.55 · 2024-12-13
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.73M
@ $316.90 · 2024-12-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$668,603
@ $307.97 · 2024-11-22
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$741,996
@ $288.49 · 2024-11-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.49M
@ $288.49 · 2024-11-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.39M
@ $276.97 · 2024-10-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GRMN
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
V
FearGreed
😏Greed(63/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GRMN
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
V
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)
View GRMN Full AnalysisView V Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: GRMN vs V

Is Garmin Ltd. or Visa Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, V trades at a -17.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $316 vs. price $370), compared to GRMN's -33.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $208 vs. $279).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Garmin Ltd. or Visa Inc.?

V scores 99/100 (Wide moat), while GRMN scores 91/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Garmin Ltd. or Visa Inc.?

Visa Inc. (V) generates a 3.0% free cash flow yield, compared to Garmin Ltd.'s 2.5%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Garmin Ltd. or Visa Inc.?

V earns 39.4% ROIC versus GRMN's 19.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Garmin Ltd.'s or Visa Inc.'s?

V's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to GRMN's 91/100 (Very Safe). V has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.