Compare StocksGPN vs INTC

Global Payments Inc. (GPN) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

GPN
Global Payments Inc.
$72.36
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$99.61

Rewards

GPN
  • Gross margin of 72.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Share count has been reduced by 10% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $4.47 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
INTC

    Risks

    GPN
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.0x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.88 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    GPN
    INTC
    Valuation
    $1.75B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-8.30B
    8.78%
    FCF Yield
    -1.66%
    16.33
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    4.47
    Forward P/E
    66.78
    Quality & Moat
    3.69%
    ROIC
    1.72%
    5.89%
    ROE
    -0.21%
    72.64%
    Gross Margin
    37.20%
    0.21
    PEG Ratio
    1.36
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.93
    Debt / Equity
    0.36
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    4.03
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.86
    1.38%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    GPN: 7Ties: 1INTC: 2
    GPNINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    GPN

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    GPN
    $-2.44
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $3.20B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-7.81B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    GPN
    50.8% Margin of Safety
    Price is 50.8% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $72.36
    Fair Value: $147.10
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $99.61
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    GPN

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $72?

    +10.3%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +7.2%

    The market implies +10.3% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +7.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    GPN
    42/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    GPN
    -2.67
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    GPN
    Insiders 0.9%Institutions 100.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,164
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,201
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    GPN
    1
    Buys (3M)
    3
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.29M
    JOHNSON JOIA M
    Director
    $99,345
    @ $81.90 · 2026-02-20
    BALDWIN ROBERT H B JR
    Director
    $1.09M
    @ $81.16 · 2025-12-11
    WATSON PATRICIA A
    Director
    $99,905
    @ $75.06 · 2025-11-07
    BALDWIN ROBERT H B JR
    Director
    $672,800
    @ $116.00 · 2024-12-13
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    GPN
    0
    Sells (3M)
    7
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $2.36M
    SHEFFIELD DAVID M
    Officer
    $164,123
    @ $81.41 · 2025-12-11
    GREEN DAVID LAWRENCE
    Officer
    $927,884
    @ $79.99 · 2025-12-03
    MCDANIEL CONNIE D
    Director
    $347,344
    @ $77.81 · 2025-11-12
    CORTOPASSI ROBERT M
    President
    $342,080
    @ $85.52 · 2025-08-21
    SHEFFIELD DAVID M
    Officer
    $207,575
    @ $83.03 · 2025-08-12
    STEELE-BELKIN DARA L.
    General Counsel
    $172,000
    @ $86.00 · 2025-08-07
    SHEFFIELD DAVID M
    Officer
    $201,975
    @ $80.79 · 2025-05-08
    CARTER ANDREA M
    Officer
    $250,015
    @ $105.67 · 2024-11-04
    GREEN DAVID LAWRENCE
    Officer
    $3.27M
    @ $104.55 · 2024-10-31
    SHEFFIELD DAVID M
    Officer
    $166,305
    @ $100.73 · 2024-08-08
    JOHNSTON SHANNON A
    Chief Technology Officer
    $169,816
    @ $98.33 · 2024-06-06
    CARTER ANDREA M
    Officer
    $367,422
    @ $111.34 · 2024-05-09
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    GPN
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(47/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(74/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    GPN
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
    View GPN Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis
    GPN vs INTC: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io